Jump to content

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

ABT Fall Season Mixed Rep PerformancesNovember 1-10

  • Please log in to reply
73 replies to this topic

#1 Helene



  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,049 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 01:21 PM

Please discuss.  We want to know!

#2 cubanmiamiboy


    Diamonds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,607 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 09:36 PM



I'm in the city just to see Chopiniana.  I LOVE this ballet...it is engraved in my heart and soul perhaps just as Giselle,  although I have been deprived of its live viewing for a long time now.  It was the very last ballet from the very last program/season I saw in Cuba before my departure, and now it is the very first time I see it in America, after 12 years.  I usually don't cry at the ballet except to the drama of our Silesian heroin, but tonight while watching Fokine's masterpiece again I visited the common places that, just as with Adam's work, make up for the essential body of aesthetic canons my taste for the art form comes from.  This is BALLET for me, and even if I'm able to highly enjoy pancake tutus and fouettes, it is in the fluffy crinolines and romantic vocabulary where I find my comfort zone. 


I can't say this production is the pinnacle of the ballet, but then I have seen Sylphides in many other incarnations, some better than others.  It doesn't matter...it is always wonderful to see. I particularly liked Seo and Forster in the PDD.  (I have seen her in other roles, and I think she's better suited for the adagio spectrum).


It was also great to see the  familiar costumes that I remembered very well from the Cuban production-(the upper bodices with the little muslin sleeves, instead of the very copied Russian fluffy arm pieces). 


Britten's orchestration emphasized the brass section and the harp.  I liked that.


Will return tomorrow for more.


The other two pieces bored me to death.

#3 Helene



  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,049 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 10:16 PM

I saw "Bach Partita" when it first premiered, and I found it deadly.  I've never seen "Gong," but from all of you descriptions, I don't think Mark Morris is your cup of tea.


Are you going to tomorrow's matinee, too?  It's with Part and Semionova.

#4 abatt


    Emeralds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,970 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 03:49 AM

I had never seen Bach Partita before last night.  I loved it and can't wait to see it again. I'm not normally a huge Tharp fan either. I thought Sylphides was overall well done, with especially lovely performances by Forster and Seo. Boylston could use some more training on the carriage of her upper body and the use of her arms and hands in this ballet. Gong was fun, and is one of the better Morris ballets. The night belonged to Murphy, who dazzled in the Tharp and the Morris. Tharp came out during the curtain call of her work and got a thunderous welcome.

#5 puppytreats


    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 751 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 04:58 AM

I saw the dress rehearsal yesterday of "Bach Partita", "Clear", and "Les Sylphides".  The music for all three pieces was beautiful.




1.  Does the real performance include a set or backdrop? I don't have a ticket to see the full production.

2. The program states that the ballet is for 6 principals and 30 corps dancers.  The rehearsal featured only 5 principals.  Stella did not have a partner.  Was this the case at night?  At the end, she performed her arabesques low to the ground, while the 2 couples standing in line to her left (Paulina/James, Marcelo/Gillian) performed assisted high arabesques and leg lifts. 

3. If Stella was partnered at the end, did she perform her other sections partnered, e.g., the sections where she looked like the Little Degas Dancer?

4. The program states that the dance is "performed to a pinnacle of solo violin repertoire, Bach's Partita No. 2 in D minor for solo piano," which includes the spiritually powerful Chaconne.  Can a musician explain this? Is the music played in concert to piano, or piano and violin?

5.  Twyla looked really cute and smooshed Marcelo's face for a long time.  Giggles.



1.  Does the real performance include a set or backdrop?

2. The director stopped the performance to start again because of missed entrances and spacing problems.  Then Sascha came back and mostly marked the piece.   How one can give notes or corrections or remark on minor spacing corrections (which often seems to happen in rehearsals) if so much of the dancing is just marked?  I always find this bizarre.

3.  The costumes were dreadful and ill-fitting.  Paloma is one of the thinner dancers, and the costume made her look heavy, even with her extremely well-toned midriff showing.

4. Most of the dancing seemed really unmusical, or unrelated to the music, although this seemed more to do with the choreography than the dancers. However, some small parts of the choreography really made certain portions of the music stand out in an interesting way, such as an interchange between instruments.  The rest of the choreography seemed derivative or banal.


"Les Sylphide"

1.  Is the prelude to this music used in any other ballet?

2.  The program states "music by Frederic Chopin, orchestrated by Benjamin Britten."  What does that mean?

3.  The sets were really dreary, in color and artwork.  

4.  I did not like this ballet when I saw it on DVD, but in person, I was nearly mesmerized.  I am so lucky to have a ticket to see Veronika in it today.

5.  The dancers require a lot more rehearsal.  The corps did not seem like a well-coordinated, classical company.  Foster lacked presence or magnetism.  Seo and Boylston missed some moves.  Lane was very loud, as was Seo, in parts.

6.  Notwithstanding the criticism, this was beautiful to behold.


These three ballets made sense together and I wonder why the mixed bills don't group them together other than in the rehearsal.

#6 California


    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,983 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 05:34 AM

I saw the rehearsal Friday afternoon and also the performance Friday night. I'll be interested in other impressions.


Partita: The music was a solo violinist (Charles Yang), who played the entire thing from memory standing in the orchestra pit. Pretty amazing and he came up on stage for bows. I believe he has worked with Marcelo Gomes before on Marcelo's choreography.

Stella's partner Friday night was Calvin Royal. I'm just guessing that he had a schedule conflict Friday afternoon, but it did seem odd for a principal role to miss the last rehearsal. I'm so pleased to see him getting these opportunities. He made a spectacular debut last spring at the Met in one of the new Ratmansky Shostakovich pieces.

I was much more impressed at the performance and realized they were quasi-marking at the rehearsal. Much more in the way of clever details Friday night.

At the bows, Marcelo led Twyla out from the wings. She seemed to appreciate the details he worked in throughout. Instantaneous standing ovation when she came out.

I must have seen this in 1983 when it premiered at the Kennedy Center, but I have no memory of it at all. Susan Jones (the rehearsal master, who also took bows with Twyla) talked about the reconstruction process during their Works & Process a few weeks ago at Guggenheim. It was never notated and they had only two poor-quality archival tapes to work from, so one wonders if parts were just re-choreoghraphed. None of the original dancers would be with the company at this point and Jones herself never danced in it.

It's definitely worth seeing - somehow it's distinctively Tharp, but much more subdued/classical than other pieces.

No set or backdrop.


Les Sylphides: I know others were pleased that Foster got the opportunity to be the Poet, but he was a big disappointment. His partnering, especially lifts, seemed painfully awkward - like a student who has no idea how to lift a ballerina. He never seemed to straighten his legs. His walks across stage seemed pedestrian with no presence or regal bearing. He so badly needs some coaching in this.

I had read about the discovery of the Britten orchestration, but haven't seen this in a long time (either in performance or on DVD) and didn't recognize differences. Presumably there were differences in which instruments took which parts, as the Chopin was originally for piano solo.


Mark Morris' Gong closed the program Friday. Juxtaposed with the Partita, it gives new meaning to "gimmickry." I don't recall ever seeing this before and perhaps I'll appreciate it more on a second viewing.

I was amazed at how many principals (never mind soloists & corps) who were in both Partita and Gong -- Marcelo, Gillian, Stella, e.g. What a work-out for these people! There was an exceptionally long intermission, but they needed it.

#7 cubanmiamiboy


    Diamonds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,607 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 05:48 AM

What I noticed the most about this orchestration was, as I said, the use of the brass section.  Sometimes the flute had its nice shining moments, and in general the treatment seems to be based in sounding less bombastic, more simple than overly symphonic arrangements that tend to be the norm.  The timpani use was particularly interesting though.


Yes, Helene.  I will be there to see Part in the role!


The grayish pseudo-gothic ruins backdrop was not the best choice I've seen for this ballet.  The programme claims it to be after the original ones by Benois. 


That Gong thing was particularly dreadful when it went silent-( contemporary choreography sans music is just in the very bottom of my list).  I closed my eyes and nicely fall asleep.  I needed some rest though...

#8 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,144 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 07:19 AM

Have to assume that as the pieces were originally written for Piano, the orchestration they are using is by Benjamin Britten? I didn't know he had done it, I thought most used one by GLazounov.

#9 kfw


    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,714 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:01 AM

Have to assume that as the pieces were originally written for Piano, the orchestration they are using is by Benjamin Britten? I didn't know he had done it, I thought most used one by GLazounov.


The NY Times ran an article on "The hunt for the lost Britten score" recently.

#10 rg


    Emeralds Circle

  • Editorial Advisor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,512 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:19 AM

as pointed out in the correction to the NYT article and as spelt out, quite authoritatively in the SYLPHIDES section of Andrew Foster's TAMARA KARSAVINA: DIAGHILEV'S BALLERINA, the Glazunov connection, which was to be sure in the mix very early in the history of Fokine's Chopin ballet, became less and less so as the years went by and as LES SYLPHIDES became the familiar ballet given outside Russia in the 20th c. 

#11 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,144 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:49 AM

Thanks so much, RG!  flowers.gif flowers.gif flowers.gif

#12 angelica


    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 642 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 12:05 PM

At the recent Guggenheim Works and Process program on ABT's fall season, one focus was on the discovery of the Benjamin Britten score for Les Sylphides. If I remember correctly, they said that David LaMarche had hand-copied all the instrumental parts for the musicians. What a labor of love! I wondered at the time whether all that effort was worth it. I saw the dress rehearsal yesterday, and my conclusion is a resounding "Yes!" I thought the orchestration was rich and gorgeous and that the orchestra sounded wonderful in the work. Perhaps playing in the smaller Koch Theater also makes a difference in the resonance of the sound, because the ABT orchestra isn't as large as the Met Opera Orchestra and perhaps the Met is too large a venue for the ABT orchestra to achieve its best sound.


In the intervening years, I'd forgotten how beautiful a ballet Les Sylphides is. However, I thought the principals in in the first cast left a lot to be desired and look forward to seeing the Veronika cast on November 10th. Ms. Part at one point struck a romantic pose that was iconic. I tried to imitate it at home, but without any success. :(

#13 onxmyxtoes


    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 168 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 01:04 PM



In the intervening years, I'd forgotten how beautiful a ballet Les Sylphides is. However, I thought the principals in in the first cast left a lot to be desired and look forward to seeing the Veronika cast on November 10th. Ms. Part at one point struck a romantic pose that was iconic. I tried to imitate it at home, but without any success. sad.png


Are you talking about when she is standing in fifth on pointe with her back turned slightly to the audience, arms raised in front of her face to the sky and she arches back?  Whenever she does that, I swoon!

#14 vipa


    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,364 posts

Posted 02 November 2013 - 08:50 PM

I just came from the ABT Sat. night performance.  Here are my impressions, I hope to hear from others.


T&V - Semionova was very disappointing.  Beautiful woman, beautiful body, strong technique but so lacking in this ballet.  For one thing she didn't cover space.  The variation that goes after the section in which she is supported by women, was done totally under herself, so it became tight and unexciting.  In other sections she seemed unmusical, never mind having imaginative phrasing.  The pdd with Cory Stearns was very business like, and I hope I can explain what I mean.  They connected in terms of looking at each other and making eye contact, but movement wise there was no juice to it.  No nuance or phrasing.  Sterns in his solos gave a respectable try.  Nothing special.  One more thing about not traveling - in the partnered parts of the last section, not much space was covered.  Maybe some coaching could give them a more - go for it - attitude.  


Clear - Not a good ballet (I wish it was lit a little more brightly) but showed off the dancers well.  Herrera looked great both physically and in terms of movement quality.  Craig Salstein was exceptional. Radetsky was wonderful. The choreography fails to give us anything of the structure of Bach.  I almost feel it could be done to any music, but I enjoyed watching the dancing.


Tempest - The good - Marcelo Gomes is a dancer who can do anything.  He seems to do any type of movement with ease, beauty and commitment.  The partnered sections with Sarah Lane were effortless - he showed her off in an extraordinary way.  Cornejo is another dancer who always amazes with his technique, ability to hold the stage and naturalness of movement.  Sarah Lane looked gorgeous.  Her creamy port de bra, technique and musicality all came together.  The friend I was with whispered in my ear, "she and do no wrong."


The bad IMO - Lack of narrative clarity.  I know Ratmansky can do it - The Bright Stream is an example.  Perhaps The Tempest is just a poor choice.  It seems to me that a choreographer has to make a choice between doing a clear narrative, or presenting something that is a distillation of relationships and events while making clear to the audience it is not a narrative.  Ratmansky tried to do both or neither, I'm not sure, but it didn't work for me. The Sibelius score didn't help


A word about Simkin.  I know he had many fans, and I can see why.  To me he always looks like he is still in dancing in a competition.  Perhaps that has to do with the roles he is given.  I can't even put my finger on why at this point.  Others like Cornejo don't strike me the same way.


Looking forward to other points of view.

#15 nysusan


    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,127 posts

Posted 03 November 2013 - 05:22 AM

I opened the program for yesterday's matinee to find a big, unwelcome surprise. Instead of Veronika Part dancing the Pas de Deux and Prelude with Semionova doing the Mazurka they had Semionova listed for the Pas de Deux and Mazurka with Part only dancing the Prelude. Bad choice.


Semionova danced beautifully but just didn't have the right style for this. To me she looked anti-romantic at the beginning, making very angular shapes instead of showing romantic epaulmamant. She was lovely in the pas de deux, very light and airy but I just didn't like her approach. She was bright and coquettish, like a russian La Sylphide and I prefer a mysterious romanticism here. She was wonderful in the mazurka, as expected - it really showed off her huge jetes. Part was gorgeous in the Prelude and got a loud, prolonged ovation. Hamrick & Sterns were fine but not exceptional . I would love to see Abrera and Kajiya in this. They are both beautiful romantic dancers, Abrera was gorgeous in it last time they did it and this is just the type of role Kajiya excels at.


Clear is a guilty pleasure, I agree that its not a great ballet and I find parts of it to be actually annoying but wow, is it a great vehicle for ABT's men. The matinee had Gomes with Royal & Hoven and it was a pleasure watching them. Marcelo can simply do no wrong and Royal continues to impress. At the evening performance I saw Forster and Mantei with Radetsky and again, you couldn't take your eyes off of any of them. All the men in the corps had their chance to shine, too. At the matinee Eric Tamm, Louis Ribagorda, Jared Matthews and Aaron Scott were all great and in the evening performance Craig Salstein, Jose Sebastian, Gabe Stone Shayer and Alexei Agoudine each made a great impression.  What depth there is among the men in this company! Paloma was good as the lone woman in the evening performance but Julie Kent was so very lovely in the afternoon. What gorgeous lines, she could dance for another 10 years if she stuck to these types of roles, just no more Petipa or McMillan, please!


I was very excited to see Boylston & Simkin cast in T&V, I thought it would suit them. It started off well, and Simkin looked great in the arabesque sequence that leads into the double tour/pirouette variation however he soon came to grief. The double tour/pirouettes were looking good but about halfway through the variation he lost his footing after which he literally stumbled through the rest of them. It was like watching a train wreck.  I saw no obvious mistakes from Boylston but the steps just didn't look right on her, I can't say why.


In the evening's T&V I can agree that Semionova didn't cover space the way she should but I still liked her, in fact I think this was her best outing so far with ABT. And I did like the pas de deux. I also give Cory full credit. He was certainly not the best I've seen in this, but he's been the best so far with ABT. In fact he's the only one of the 3 men who was able to get through all of the steps (Whiteside got thru them on opening night but it looked like he simplified the tour/pirouette variation).


This was the 2nd time I've seen the Tempest and this time I could barely stay awake through it despite all the wonderful dancing. Its just so unfocused and the music isn't exactly exciting.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):