Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

nysusan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    1,427
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Registration Profile Information

  • Connection to/interest in ballet** (Please describe. Examples: fan, teacher, dancer, writer, avid balletgoer)
    fan
  • City**
    ny,ny
  • State (US only)**, Country (Outside US only)**
    NY, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Dance Masterpieces was a fabulous program and I'm so glad I made the trip to see it. I went to the Friday & Sat matinees & evening performances. I love all 3 pieces but Upper Room is my favorite. It's the only one I was a little disappointed in, but more on that later. I've seen The River may times, most recently by the Ailey company but they don't dance it on point and I like it so much better with the women in point shoes - as Ailey choreographed it for ABT! I particularly liked Oksana Maslova in Meander, she put a very sensual spin on the choreography. Yuka Iseda danced Lake with Austin Eyler and Twin Cities with Arian Molina Soca at both matinees. Dayesi Torriente did Lake with Jack Thomas and Twin Cities with Sterling Baca on Friday and Sat evening. All of them were great and Iseda & Torriente were totally different. Iseda looks to be a small dancer, sinewy with very pliable back and torso. She brought a poignant vulnerability to Lake. Her partner, Austin Eyler, is big, tall & strong but still with a nice clean line. He was a great partner to her, making all of those difficult lifts look so easy. Torriente made a big impression on me years ago when I saw her as Myrtha in Giselle. I loved her Lake too, her take on it was strong and sweeping, more along the lines of the role's originator, Cynthia Gregory. The matinee cast of In the Middle was good, but the evening cast was great. Especially Nayara Lopes, Maslova, Iseda and Torriente. They threw themselves into those crazy attenuated extensions and twisty arabesques into attitudes that folded in and over. Loved this. In the Upper Room felt a tad low energy to me. That may not make sense since its such a high energy piece but this felt like maybe half a step down compared to what I'm used to seeing. I think part of it was the staging/lighting/haze. They used a scrim and the haze didn't move or change at all. The lighting changed, but not the haze. I've seen this often and recently (Tharp's own staging with her hand picked dancers at City Center last year) and I remember the haze billowing and retracting, swallowing up the dancers at some points, sometimes obscuring parts of them and allowing them to burst out of the haze at other times. Here they appeared from and disappeared into the haze at the back of the stage on their entrances and exits but that was about it. The billowing haze gives it a pulse that mirrors the propulsion in the music, sweeping the dance along. I didn't get that feeling here. The cast was the same in all 5 performances and while they were all very good, except for the last 10 minutes of the piece I didn't get the feeling that they were dancing full out. It looked like they were trying to hit perfect ballet positions rather than pushing through with abandon and I didn't quite get that feeling of euphoria and exhilaration from them. With other companies I felt that by the end they were completely exhausted and unable to take one more step but I didn't get that feeling here. It might have helped it they'd had 2 casts. But a less than perfect Upper Room is still great and I loved seeing it. I loved the company, they have some great dancers and there was not one I didn't like. I'm very much looking forward to seeing their Corsaire, La Sylphide and Swan Lake next year.
  2. I love his plans for next season, and I am going to buy a subscription. Corsaire, Swan Lake, La Sylphide/Etudes & a modern program appeals to me much more than ABT's spring season. It's just a 1 hr 40 minute train ride away. In fact I'm taking that train ride today to see their Dance Masterpieces program.
  3. I'm coming to see the recon at Broward...maybe I'll see you there!
  4. Solitude was still very moving however I found the 2nd cast to be far inferior to the 1st cast. Not Danchig-Waring, he was different from Gordon but still very good both technically and emotionally. The big difference was Nadon/Mearns vs LaFreniere/Phelan with the latter bringing little beyond the steps to their roles. Nor was Veyette Chan's equal as a partner. Mearns' breadth of movement gave the sense of being a benevolent angel, adding greatly to the piece. Nadon was wonderful, the way she gobbles up space and displaces air her every move conveyed intent. Neither LaFreniere nor Phelan had that kind of impact. As an example, there is a moment when Nadon is thrown high & far by her partner & caught by 2 other men. With Nadon it was a startling, gasp inducing moment. With LaFreniere you hardly noticed it. The rest of the cast was fine, Von Enck looked great as always but that is such a small role.
  5. So do I. They have the casting online in the digital program and what a cast for tomorrow's matinee! Bell with Misseldine, Curley as VR and Crispino/Gonzales in the Neopolitan. Can't wait to hear what you think of it.
  6. I agree that Maxwell has had important roles and done well with them. But she is already a soloist and I don't see a promotion to principal coming right now. Certainly not before Kitka, Millar & Von Enck. I would not object to seeing Sautter and Afanasenkov promoted out of the corps, but on the other hand I would not mind their being held back a couple of years to continue their development. Alec Knight certainly deserves a promotion to soloist.
  7. I am a huge fan of the Peck work and enjoyed the fluff piece from the Times but thought it was highly exaggerated. For one thing, while Stanley may consider himself non-binary but to my knowledge he has only danced male roles at NYCB. And it's not as if Edwards was debuting the Walz girl in Serenade. Both couples in The Times are Racing have had gender swaps since early on in it's history. Ashly Isaacs and more recently Brittany Pollack have danced the Robbie Fairchild role. The pdd Edwards and Taylor did was originated by T. Peck and Ramasar, but the T. Peck role has also been danced by male dancers including Stanley himself (with Applebaum). So while it was nice to see this with Edwards & Stanley (and I enjoyed them in it) it didn't feel to me like it was "making history" in any way. It may have felt that way to Edwards but to me it was just another interesting cast change.
  8. Beautiful! I'm going to see her (& Mejia) in this soon but bummed that I'm not going to be able to see her first Ballo. She is quite something.
  9. NYCB posted "flash footage" of Sautter & Bolden from In a Landscape on Facebook. Don't know if this will come thru but here is the link https://www.facebook.com/watch?v=7899317113415737
  10. And I agree with all of those posts about Phelan - I don't think a significant number of people come to the ballet because she is dancing. She has a very striking instrument, beautiful plastique, solid technique and management loves her. I have seen her give some gorgeous performances but unfortunately probably an equal number of flat, boring ones. I agree with people on this board who think that is because she has been thrown into too many roles too soon. I hope they hold off on giving ner new assignments, she needs to settle into the roles she has. I only add performances to see Mearns, Nadon, von Enck, Mejia and Afanasenkov. Now adding Sautter to that list. Also Peck to a lesser degree, and in the old days - Bouder.
  11. Ava Sautter - WOW. I mean really WOW! Tall, long legged with great extensions - plush 6 o'clocks and great control of those limbs. Beautiful port de bras and intense stage presence that just grabs your attention. I haven't felt this way about a dancer since the first time I saw Nadon. Everything else was fine. I love Bolden but Landscape was all Sautter. Love Ballo, cannot watch that ballet without smiling. Huxley was great and so were the soloists - O. Mackinnon, von Enck, MacGill and Hod. Fairchild was fine but a little underpowered. I do not like Hallelujah Junction, found it extremely boring and really couldn't appreciate Maxwell, Gordon and Takahashi. I've seen the Concert too many times, the gags are getting stale for me. Nadon acquitted herself well, she was charming and goofy but this is not her forte. The rest of the cast was great in this character driven piece, but I'm done with this ballet for at last the next 5 years.
  12. 4th week casting is up! Nadon as Choleric! Laracey in Liebeslieder! https://res.cloudinary.com/new-york-city-ballet/image/upload/v1706723614/Documents/Casting/NYCB_Casting_February_13-18_2024_lobby.pdf
  13. I would love to see Nadon's Sugarplum, and there are a few seats left but those prices are too much for me. I paid way too much to see the Von Enck/Mejia/Peck cast last week and can't justify $155 for a decent seat to see the Nadon cast. Even seats in the back of the 4th ring are $125. Good for NYCB, but bad for me!
  14. Yes, the tickets cost a fortune and yes the cast was fabulous so they were well worth it! My one and only Nutcracker splurge. The only sour note was the violin solo (the one interpolated from the Sleeping Beauty). The program listed Delmoni as the soloist but there was a substitution announcement at the start of the performance. I didn't recognize the name so I don't remember it. To my ear it was shrill and screetchy, something I've never heard from the NYCB orchestra before. It was a terrible thing to do to a beautiful piece of music.
  15. That was gorgeous! Wish ABT would put them together more often during the Met season.
×
×
  • Create New...