Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Who are the "master" choreographers of today?


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#1 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 08:46 AM

Balanchine, in Robert Gottlieb's opinion, is a "supreme master," comparable in creativity to Shakespeare. Petita lives on stages all over the world in full-length classics. Fokine and others get revived, praised, forgotten, then revived again.

The list of choreographers whose works have "legs" and who are considered central to the art of ballet is not long, considering all those who've created dances over the years.

Here's a few questions I have NO idea how to answer on my own, without imput from other posters:

Who among contemporary choreographers in ballet, "contemporary ballet," fusion, or whatever, are most likely to survive in a league with the masters? Which works? And -- most important -- WHY, in your opinion?

(If you don't think there are any -- why not?)

Edited to add last sentence.

Edited by bart, 07 July 2005 - 08:48 AM.


#2 Hans

Hans

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,104 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 09:09 AM

I wouldn't put Christopher Wheeldon on a par with Petipa, but his works are so much in demand that I imagine they'll survive. I'm waiting to see how much success Avi Scher has--hopefully a lot!

#3 Renata

Renata

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 100 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 10:36 AM

Matthew Neenan of the Pennsylvania Ballet is an up and coming choreographer. I think that no one can figure out whose works will survive for a hundred years, but Neenan's works are certainly worth seeing.

#4 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,263 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 05:35 PM

I'm one who thinks there are no "master choreographers" in ballet working today. (In modern dance, you have Paul Taylor and Merce Cunningham still working, and I think Mark Morris has been around long enough to be considered a Master. There would be people who would say Twyla Tharp, Tricia Brown and Susan Marshall are; I would not.) To be a master, you have to KNOW she or he is in the history books -- and often that comes early. Otherwise, the person is promising, or a journeyman. Many people thought Eliot Feld would be a master choreographer when he began working, and for a decade after, and then that promise was, sadly, not fulfilled.

[Editing to say: I wrote that back in 2005! I feel differently today.]

#5 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,346 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 06:03 PM

I agree that there are no "master" ballet choreographers today. I do think that specific ballets will make it on the list, and that it is a sad state of ballet choreograpers when three ballets by modern choreographers -- Maelstrom and Sylvia by Morris and Push Comes to Shove by Tharp -- could make the it to top of the post-Balanchine list, the latter because of its importance to Baryshnikov at the beginning of his American career.

#6 Paul Parish

Paul Parish

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,925 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 06:44 PM

I'm convinced that Forsythe's New Sleep, Artifact 2, and "in the middle, somewhat elevated' will be around for a long time -- dancers will want to do them. I should add Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude. which is a capriccio of a high order....

New Sleep is in fact VERY funny. you do have to have a taste for the preposterous -- but there should be no shortage of that in the future.

I think Forsythe is a major fantast.

Oh, and I agree with Helene that Maelstrom is really beautiful, and it becomes more so every time I see it, and that in SYlvia, parts of Act I and ALL of Act 3 are great. Again, the dancers will not let them die.

#7 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 06:45 PM

Perhaps I should redefine my request to "potential" master choreographers. Is there no one who leads you to think that there's a long-term future for the the creation of new ballet masterpieces?

Or is ballet doomed to become a museum for revivals, floating on a river of transitory, forgettable, disposable ... minorpieces?

#8 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,346 posts

Posted 07 July 2005 - 10:35 PM

I also agree with Paul that a set of Forsythe ballets will last. Even if there's no potential "master" that I can see now -- and I may be blind to some -- I could see individual or a handful of ballets by various people choreographing now staying in the rep. I loved Paul Gibson's new piece for PNB, The Piano Dance, and I have my hopes that he will emerge as one of those masters. I think Kent Stowell's The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet is well worth other companies performing; in my opinion, the score, which drives the dramatic arc of the ballet, is much more suited to the story than the Prokofiev score, and I'd much rather see his Seasons variations from Cinderella, which were performed by four dancers in the PNB school performance last month, than most gala fare. Like orchestral suites that provide excerpts of longer works, the entire Seasons section of Stowell's ballet would make a great one-acter, or part of a pair of shorter works.

I saw a performance of the triple bill "Red, Hot, and New" by The Australian Ballet last December, which put me in a bad mood for several months. There was much brilliant dancing, particularly by Lucinda Dunn, Marc Cassidy, and Madeleine Eastoe, but the program consisted of Wheeldon's Continuum, Nicolo Fonte's Almost Tango, and Adrian Burnett's Aesthetic Arrest. Wheeldon's ballet was the most accomplished. Fonte removed the emotional resonance of sex, violence, and desperation from tango and left only the bare-bones mechanics, which reminded me of the day I walked into a friend's living room in mid-afternoon and mistook a close-up in the porn film on TV for The Surgery Channel. The most interesting part of Aesthetic Arrest, another work to John Adams' Fearful Symmetries, was the set.

But it wasn't even the uneven quality of the choreography that had me in a deep funk; it was the sameness of the three: 8-14 dancers, lifting pas de deux, lifting pas de deux, corp members doing their own thing, lifting pas de deux... I didn't see steps. I didn't see development. I didn't see structure. The anti-hierarchical nature of the approach of all three choreographers didn't lead anywhere, in my opinion.

The last PNB choreographers workshop gave me hope. Even though by its very nature -- i.e., begging, borrowing, and stealing dancers from rehearsals for the next program -- the small groups of dancers numbered the same as the in the AB works, none of the ballets looked alike. Olivier Wevers choreographed the first part of a work in progress, called One's Symphony to music by Christopher Rouse for two couples, a featured woman, and eight corps women. Wevers has a voice, and a very strong one. Using inverted gestures and steps, he created an insect-like world that was very accomplished. Porretta choreographed a good-natured spoof of a classical ballet -- very Symphony in C, down to the costumes -- to music by Karl Perkins (the "Diamond commercial" music) and Bond's take on the same music, and it was clever, energetic, and engaging. Christophe Maraval's O to music by Satie was the most conventional, with lifting pas de deux -- quite Robbins-like -- but because it was a short ballet, there was enough movement to fill the music. And, it showcased beautifully two couples who rarely dance together -- Nakamura and Porretta, and Maraval's frequent partner Louise Nadeau and Batkhurel Bold, who's often cast with Carrie Imler. Kiyon Gaines' blitz...Fantasy, for a main couple, three men, and eight corps women, was one of the better responses to the music of Adams and Glass, and was far more interesting and developed than the Burnett piece, which was presented on the stage of the Sydney Opera House.

I have two hopes: the first is that the choreographic workshops that many companies sponsor give enough opportunities to classically trained dancers to develop into, if not master choreographers, choreographers who will feed and nurture ballet companies. The second is that the good, solid, to great classical ballets by these classical dancers who are dedicated to classical ballet are given exposure by multiple companies, so that like Lamberena, The Moor's Pavane, and in the Middle, Somewhat Elevated, they have a chance to be seen multiple times, by multiple companies and casts. It would be a great irony if a mini-masterpiece was lost in the modern age of video tape and the Internet.

#9 Hans

Hans

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,104 posts

Posted 08 July 2005 - 04:47 AM

Bejart will be in the history books, especially in Europe. I still don't know what I think about him--his work is interesting but not moving IMO.

#10 artist

artist

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 177 posts

Posted 02 April 2007 - 08:11 PM

Jiri Kylian has been becoming more known. With his more modern/contemporary works, he is sure to have more than just a temporary impact on dance as it becomes fresh and new. His humorous pieces are of a liking to the audience, though that doesn't mean he'll stay. But I think good things will happen to this guy as he does more and more in the future and companies start performing his works live more often.

And just thinking of audiences and future, perhaps Mathew Bourne's Swan Lake will stay due to the innovative style and different approach to a classic. Many people are always looking for unique works and something that will bring them out of the "classical" status quo.

#11 Mashinka

Mashinka

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,198 posts

Posted 03 April 2007 - 01:31 AM

Perhaps I should redefine my request to "potential" master choreographers.


Alexei Ratmansky gets better as he gets older. He created a minor masterpiece with The Bright Stream, given time he will create a major masterpiece.

Hopefully Forsythe's work will sink like a stone.

#12 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 03 April 2007 - 05:07 PM

Jiri Kylian has been becoming more known. With his more modern/contemporary works, he is sure to have more than just a temporary impact on dance as it becomes fresh and new. His humorous pieces are of a liking to the audience, though that doesn't mean he'll stay.

Kylian is no longer a young choreographer. Twenty or so years ago, he was the great golden hope, but that hope, alas, was never realized. At least not in my opinion. His strongest works are still his earliest, such as Return to a Strange Land and Sinfonia.

#13 chiapuris

chiapuris

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 316 posts

Posted 04 April 2007 - 08:34 AM

I find more classical features in the works of Mark Morris than in the works of any current ‘ballet’ choreographers. Foremost, his love for the selected music shines through.

Of the ‘ballet’ choreographers, Ratmansky’s Bright Stream is a refreshing work combining traditional pas de deux, demi-caractere, great ballabiles, and a silly story with an outstanding 20th c. musical score. The Bright Stream may have staying power. I’m not sure about his Cinderella.

Martins, Kylian and other contemporary big-output choreographers may be first-order craftsmen, but with little to tell us about the future of the classical canon.

Maybe Wheeldon, but not yet, at least for me.

#14 Pamela Moberg

Pamela Moberg

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 579 posts

Posted 04 April 2007 - 02:48 PM

Sir Kenneth MacMillan will definitely survive, more so than Ashton, and possibly some works by John Cranko.
I am only talking English here, but I think that Ashton fell into oblivion a lot by the demise of Margot Fonteyn.
I did see some of MacMillan's early works when I was a kid and he always fascinated me.
Of the Europeans, well, Bejart might survive.
Birgit Cullberg's "Miss Julie" might survive, but nothing else by her, and Ek's work will definitely not last.

All these choreographers are now dead, except Bejart and Ek, yet one must count them as choregraphers of today. IMO, there are only two recent greats: Balanchine and MacMillan. All the rest are way, way behind.

#15 richard53dog

richard53dog

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,401 posts

Posted 04 April 2007 - 05:39 PM

Even though I don't really like his work that much,
I think some of Roland Petit's works will survive.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):