Eric Conrad: Russians Hire/Teach Americans for Money
Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:41 PM
My thoughts? I think their is some truth in what he says like in the reason why Russian schools like the Moscow State Academy and Vaganova Academy hire foreign students. (I always personally thought it was that reason, especially seeing the astronimically high tuition prices) And the ballet schools in the U.S. But the other statements he makes in his video's (especially with his statements that the Russian way is the "truth" when ballet is not a Russian creation neither is it the only way and style to teach ballet) I disagree with and think is rubbish.
I'm only a University student who likes to casually watch ballet. I'd love to hear thoughts from others on this board who know more about ballet and/ or have danced it.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:47 PM
Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:59 PM
But he can fix that, right?
Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:53 PM
That being said, I don't doubt for a second that the Bolshoi/Bolshoi School has opened up to foreigners for the cash. I have no doubt that at least some of the teachers at the Bolshoi School feel pimped out and/or cynical about the entire enterprise.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:58 AM
Posted 31 July 2012 - 01:48 PM
I tend to agree, Plisskin. And thank you for starting the topic.
Posted 01 August 2012 - 06:55 AM
Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:23 AM
In fact, knowing that I wish that now more than ever the States had their own dance curriculum/ style, and ballet culture that rivaled the Russians, French, British, even the Cubans. (But I think ABT is trying to push a National Curriculum that Franco De Vita and McKenzie drafted and teach their students of JKO) And although they are being hailed in the U.S. press as the first American to dance with these companies, they are not a product of an American school or style. I find that bittersweet.
You see so many dancers, in this case American dancers, whom put dancing overseas at the Bolshoi, Mariinsky, POB, or RB on a pedestal. While dancing in their own top national companies isn't of the same calibre and prestige. Maybe I am wrong about that last bit(?), but that is the feeling I've been getting since I've gotten into ballet.
Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:34 AM
For many years now, American universities (primarily the public/state schools) have aggressively recruited both international students and out-of-state students for one reason: they pay full tuition fees and universities are desperate for cash with all the cut-backs in state support. (I can think of three European countries where I know they are recruiting American students for their universities for the very same reason - they need the money.) The backlash among faculty is not that they feel "pimped out" but that residents of their own states are being excluded to accommodate the international students. Welcome to capitalism, Russia!
Posted 01 August 2012 - 07:41 AM
For the students who want to dance the Russian classics, it's not surprising that they look to the Bolshoi and Mariinsky especially as the pinnacle.
That said, the Mariinsky school started out as royal academy, and it and the Bolshoi schools were exclusive and, apart from war periods, considered so important that they were sheltered and funded even as people starved. The public importance was prestige, not to provide opportunities to tax-paying residents. There have been enough students over the years who had connections and were less talented than students who were rejected, so it's never been purely the "best of the best," but it's the difference between accepting a legacy student and a foreigner.
Posted 01 August 2012 - 08:28 AM
Posted 01 August 2012 - 09:56 AM
Posted 01 August 2012 - 11:27 AM
If you follow his logic -- i.e., Russia has everything, America has nothing -- it makes perfect sense that Osipova would be perfectly fine dancing with Hallberg on the American stage in his company, because she is so clearly superior and brings luster and prestige to him and ABT (and wherever else they guest outside Russia). Superior artists guest star with lesser companies all the time, and they get paid good cash to do so. They also get to build leverage with their home company, because what they are offered outside could compensate more and more for what they would lose withing the company, at least temporarily.
That in itself would make not her mercenary. It's Conrad's claim that Hallberg isn't capable of partnering her and that she is endangered by his partnering. If that's the case, she's willing to risk her health and career for quick cash and opportunities now, and that's pretty mercenary, although entirely her own risk to take.
He also claims that Hallberg was given the position because of his personal relationship with the Bolshoi director -- I assume Filin -- and that it will likely cause both Hallberg and Filin to be fired. He said the critics have been negative and that it's widely reported in the Russian press that this has been a mistake, and I think he was saying the press was reporting potential firings, although I might have misunderstood. I don't read Russian -- perhaps someone who's been following this in the Russian press could comment.
Again following the logic, if Filin is fired, then the current situations could be a temporary respite for Osipova and Vasiliev. who might be able to waltz back into the Bolshoi as returning heroes. So it would really be a win/win situation for them to posit leaving as a response to the cheapening of Russian ballet: they get lots of roles, guest appearances, new productions, and freedom, establishing an international brand bigger than some greater dancers, as well as apartments in expensive Russian cities and a pile of cash in the meantime, while they are still young, and then when some one else takes over the Company, they're golden, until at least the next regime change.
Posted 01 August 2012 - 11:39 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: