Jump to content


Bowing


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 mnclimber

mnclimber

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 22 October 2006 - 10:47 AM

Hello all,

I just saw a production of sleeping beauty last night, my first time seeing it. I'm now curious...is it normal for the dancers to take bows after their solos?? I'm sorry that I don't know the names of any of the dances, but it first happened after the first time that Aurura danced, her and the three suitors danced, then she took a couple of bows. Later, some of the fairies also took bows after dancing. This seemed really odd to me, but since this was really my first actuall ballet to see (Swan Lake by Mathew Bourne is the only other I've seen live). I really enjoyed the production, I thought they did quite well from what I know. I felt bad that there was only like 50 people in the audience.

Anyway, sorry I get wordy, just curious if this is normal...thanks!!!

Mike

#2 volcanohunter

volcanohunter

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,903 posts

Posted 22 October 2006 - 12:26 PM

Yes, frequent bowing is quite normal at ballet performances. It allows the audience to acknowledge dancers individually.

Which production of Sleeping Beauty did you see?

#3 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 22 October 2006 - 04:29 PM

mnclimber, I also hope you'll give us the details about, and your impressions of, the Sleeping Beauty performance.

From posts on other threads, I gather that the Russians are especially known for the frequency of their bows after each individual sections of ballets: variations, pas de deux, big solos, etc.

Has breaking up the performance in this manner, as a matter of course, always been the practice in ballet?

Was there ever a time when stopping the performance for applause was reserved for and limited to occasions when the dancing was exceptionally brilliant?

#4 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 22 October 2006 - 07:00 PM

I wonder if it's ever the case when the audience does not applaud and cheer a display of live virtuosity -- and the performer acknowledge it -- whether it's a song in a musical or an aria in an opera -- or a variation in ballet. In fact, in the old movie musicals, there are pauses after the big numbers, such as Fred and Ginger's dances, to allow the movie audience to applaud the dancing and not drown out the dialogue. Of course, there was no bowing in the films.

When movie audience responses petered out over the years (probably around the release of the "That's Entertainment" series? :clapping: ), directors stopped including pauses, and studios began editing out the ones in older fiilms.

mnclimber, I also hope you'll give us the details about, and your impressions of, the Sleeping Beauty performance.

And me, too!

#5 mnclimber

mnclimber

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 04:58 AM

Well, it's very good to know that I should expect that in the future!! It's good that a couple of people in the audience at least knew to get the rest of us started then!!

As for which production it was, it was put on by Continental Ballet, a smaller company here in Bloomington. In the description on their website, it says some original coreography by Riet Velthuisen, the director, so I'm not sure what's by her and what's traditional. It was at a community center, and like I said, really only about 50 people there. Aside from the music being too loud, the stage possibly a little too small, and surprised by the pauses for applause, I thought it was really good overall. Their costumes were really nice, and I thought all of the dancers did quite well. That's not to say you couldn't tell some dancers were better than others. Some of them you could just tell they had to work at staying on their toes (sorry, but is it better to say "en pointe" then instead?? I'm still learning the basic terms...sorry). And it was really nice to now be able to understand what some of you talk about when referring to dancers transitions to and from pointe, demi-point and such. Aurora and the Prince (Tatianta Berenova and Pavel Homko married and both trained in Russia and have impressive sounding history) danced beautifully together. I thought it seemed obvious that they have danced together a lot and were very comfortable together. The other times that there was a guy and girl dancing together, there seemed to be a huge difference.

Anyway...sorry for a somewhat rambling post, I've gotta watch some more ballet to get a better idea of what's what still. This being the first time I've seen pointe work and a more traditional ballet, I don't really have anything to compare it to.

Thanks for answering my original question!!

Mike

#6 SanderO

SanderO

    Silver Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 621 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:15 AM

Obviously taking bows and curtain calls is both ad hoc and "rehearsed". I recall an article in the ABT playbill about the whole protocol around the bouquet of flowers presented to the lead ballerina. Who knew it was so formally "structured"? That little article did answer many questions in my mind about how those flowers got on stage at the end of a performance.

I would imagine that bows and departing flourishes must be "rehearsed" and anticipated... perhaps depending on the audience enthusiasm? Does anyone know the inside scoop about how this is done? Who decides when to "interrupt" the performance for some bows etc. Even, who decides how many curtain calls are made and which cast members appear etc.?

#7 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 08:43 AM

Good questions! And how about selecting and directing the ballerina who escorts the conductor onto the stage for his bow? And -- how do the handle it when there is obviously not enough audience enthusiasm to sustain all of this post-curtain choreography?

#8 volcanohunter

volcanohunter

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,903 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:58 AM

One of my strangest experiences with bowing took place during a performance of Sleeping Beauty. The women dancing the jewels in act 3 finished their bit, took a bow to the right, and then as they were about to bow to the left the applause just died. I'd never seen anything like it. There hadn't been anything wrong with the performance, but the audience, perhaps anxious to see the Bluebird pas de deux, all stopped applauding at the exact same moment, and the dancers walked off the stage in complete silence. I felt terrible and hoped to make it up to those women at the final curtain call, but they didn't come back out. I can't really blame them.

#9 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 11:42 AM

In Raymonda Variations, Balanchine actually choreographed a call for the woman dancing the piccolo variation. (It may have been one of those "keep it in" accidents.) I remember one performance -- but not the dancer -- when the applause after her variation did not warrant a call, but she popped out of the wings nonetheless and curtsied to near silence. Very awkward.

#10 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,464 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 01:12 PM

There are many conventions attached to bowing, some of them historical and some specific to certain companies or audiences. In the early romantic and classical era works, performances were often in an opera environment, and some of the theatrical traditions that attach to opera carried over to dance. In those cases, the aria as a stand-alone kind of work, with acknowlegement at the end, became the bow at the end of an extended solo or duet. Petipa's works are often constructed in this 'modular' fashion, with natural pauses at the end of most variations. This is reinforced in many of the classical works by their actual scenarios, placing dancing in a performance situation -- the dancers 'bow' to the observers on stage, and therefore to us in the audience. (think fairy variations and wedding performers in Sleeping Beauty). This convention starts to come apart toward the end of the classical period (contrast the Petipa and Ivanov acts in Swan Lake), but still crops up as a theatrical tradition, even when it is not supported by the structure of the choreography.

I've been fascinated for years in seeing how a dance 'tells' the audience that it is over, especially if the work is not well known to the viewers. There seem to be myriad clues involved, but even then, there can be a fraught moment before understanding takes place and the response kicks in.

Here in Seattle, Pacific Northwest Ballet has been doing front-of-the-curtain bows (sometimes called tab bows) after the full stage bows for around 3 years, and it's only been recently that audiences seems to anticipate them. For an uncomfortable number of performances the applause would die off quite quickly after the main curtain came down (even though the spotlights came up on the curtain and you could see it being pulled back for the dancers to pass by) and things needed to get started up again when the first performers stepped out in front. I like these bows very much -- the dancers are just that much closer to the audience, and it feels very immediate, but I have great respect for those people who had to step out in front of an audience who had started looking for their bags on the floor and standing up to head out to the lobby for a break.

#11 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 01:44 PM

Thanks for your responses and for helping put this in a historical context.

I've been fascinated for years in seeing how a dance 'tells' the audience that it is over, especially if the work is not well known to the viewers. There seem to be myriad clues involved, but even then, there can be a fraught moment before understanding takes place and the response kicks in.

What a great idea for a thread -- or an article. Can anyone help with the research on this? The big tableaux endings are easy. What about the more subtle or ambiguous endings that might indeed be confusing -- as, for instance, when the music ends by fading away? Which ones are handled well? Which ones fizzle out and cause confusion?

#12 Paul Parish

Paul Parish

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,925 posts

Posted 23 October 2006 - 09:34 PM

mnclimber, how lucky that you got to see Sleeping beauty so early in your "career" -- it is such a great ballet, and it sounds like it "got to you" (in hte best sense) even in a small production. t also sounds like you're smart and observant -- one of the fascinating htings about ballet is how obvious it is who's comfortable and who's not, and how important that is -- i.e., the lead couple clearly know how to dance with each other and it makes yhem more comfortable, and htat makes YOU more comfortable. A WHOLE lot of the gallantry in ballet has to do with these attentions, the ability to put someone else at their ease -- and that's what makes it civilized and civilizing and a pleasure to see.

Are you talking about Bloomington Indiana? There's a ballet company, you know, at the University -- our own Ed McPherson came from there, and it's a very good school, by all reports. You might want to see some more ballets that they dance.

Good luck, and keep us posted.

PS In the OLD old days, not only was there applause interrupting hte show, and bows, if the audience REALLY liked something they swould "stop the show" -- literally clap and holler until in extreme cases the performer would do the whole thing all over again. They'd cry "Bis! Bis" or "Encore!" which is French for "do it again!" That would even happen with movies -- the Nicholas Brothers' movies, it would happen that hte audience would make the projector rewind the movie and show their dances again -- even if they were only making a 'guest appearance" and it was supposed to be a Don Ameche/Betty Grable movie, like "Down Argentine Way" (which is an exceptionallly stupid movie with a sublime number by hte Nicholas Bros.)

#13 mnclimber

mnclimber

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 24 October 2006 - 05:03 AM

Wow, you guys are truly a wealth of information, and you've thrown in some nice stories too!!!

Thanks for all the responses!

Paul, nope, not Indiana, I'm in Minnesota, Bloomington is a suburb of Minneapolis.

Thanks!
Mike

#14 bart

bart

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,320 posts

Posted 24 October 2006 - 11:12 AM

Here are some personal thoughts that Roberto Bolle has about the practice of interrupting performances for bowing (AND about certain performances which take place in complete audience silence). It's taken from a LINK posted by mussel on the Alessandra Ferri retirement thread.

What does he [Bolle] think of vocal audiences, particularly if they interrupt the flow with applause and cheering…does it distract him or encourage him? "I like it very much…it makes me feel the audience and it's very exciting.

Sometimes I perform in front of really dead audiences; for example, in Italy I sometimes get an audience who are mostly there because they have subscriptions to La Scala and get a ballet or two per season thrown in amongst the operas. They often sit there and look as if they don't really want to be there, and that is terrible for us; I try to do my best and there is no response. I need to feel an audience.



#15 SanderO

SanderO

    Silver Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 621 posts

Posted 08 May 2007 - 04:04 AM

Reading this thread got me thinking about "group think"... of audiences. It seems that when you attend a performance there is a consensus in the audience and so after some wonderful moment the audience will show their appreciation and applaud or shout out some "bravos" or "bravas"... I've not heard any other words... why is that? I think I shouted out
YES at the opera once...

But after reading reviews it is more than obvious that not everyone responds the same way to the same performance. I don't recall ever hearing a very few enthusiastic audience members clapping and shouting their bravos and the rest of those attending remaining quiet. Why not?

Do you think the audience reaction is a bit "infectious" as opposed to spontaneous? Clearly when virtuosity is displayed almost all the audience is enthused and reacts spontaneously.

So who are the reactive audience members? I wonder if the real cognoscenti are less demonstrative and the audience outbursts are mostly from the enthusiastic relative newbies. So who do you think are the shouters? And the booers... (I've not seen that... but I heard that Roberto Alagna was booed off the stage in La Scala this past Fall. Are some audiences more sedate and better behaved?

I would think that the performers like the spontaneous feedback... no?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):