Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

Honestly!


Recommended Posts

In my edition of today's New York Times, the Section 2 front page teaser for the excellent article about Miriam Pellman (see today's Links thread) reads:

The distinct advantages of squinting down at Ballanchine from way up in the cheap seats.

Anyone else see this, or is it just we in the provinces who get the poor copy-editing?

Link to comment
You couldn't imagine, how often russian names are not right spelled. Not that there is one letter, as a l, too much or too less, there is the whole name wrong.

You're so right that we Westerners tend to butcher Russian names, especially since in each language there's a different set of transliteration logic from Cyrillic, based on the letters and sounds available in each Western language. Living in Germany, I'm sure you see this all the time, especially when comparing German transliterations to the ones in English and American media.

"Balanchine," though, was born Balanchivadze -- he was Georgian -- and was renamed Balanchine when he joined Diaghilev's company in Paris. So we don't think the New York Times has any excuses for this one :thanks:

Link to comment

Proofreading is a dicey proposition everywhere. I worked on a project in Seattle a few years ago to create a tourism brochure that promoted local arts organizations. The final copy was looked over by several people, none of whom noticed that Balanchine was spelled with two "l"s.

But today's paper (Seattle Times) gave me the giggles. In a section called "Rant and Rave" (readers write and phone in their complaints and compliments) someone was lauding the two men who "used their wench" to pull her car out of a ditch. To make it even more perfect, it was on the same page as James Kilpatrick's syndicated column on language and usage. The subject today was poor proofreading, and the example he used was a description of Donald Rumsfeld "circumventing the globe." There are days when everything conspires to make you laugh.

Link to comment

In this age of spell-check, we are also faced with the GIGO phenomenon. That stands for "Garbage In, Garbage Out." Some person with a little authority on the Arts & Leisure section had possibly entered the misspelling into the machine lexicon, and nobody else caught it. It's not an excuse, but it could be a potential explanation.

Link to comment
In this age of spell-check, we are also faced with the GIGO phenomenon.  That stands for "Garbage In, Garbage Out."  Some person with a little authority on the Arts & Leisure section had possibly entered the misspelling into the machine lexicon, and nobody else caught it.  It's not an excuse, but it could be a potential explanation.

Or in the civilian world, accidentally adding the incorrect spelling into the spell check dictionary when prompted.

Link to comment
In this age of spell-check, we are also faced with the GIGO phenomenon.  That stands for "Garbage In, Garbage Out."  Some person with a little authority on the Arts & Leisure section had possibly entered the misspelling into the machine lexicon, and nobody else caught it.  It's not an excuse, but it could be a potential explanation.

Or in the civilian world, accidentally adding the incorrect spelling into the spell check dictionary when prompted.

In both of these cases (winch and wench, circumnavigating and circumventing) it's not a case of misspelling -- they are all real words, and so if you are depending on the spell check function to flag difficulties, you could miss these mistakes.

Link to comment
To be fair, the incorrect spelling was limited to the headline on the front page teaser. That was written by a copy editor, who may or may not be familiar with the arts. Balanchine was spelled correctly in the article itself. So it was simply a "typo."

Quite so; that is just such a "person in authority" I had in mind. But I bet when s/he fed "Balanchine" into the spell-check dictionary, it came back with "Ballantine" either for the books or the beer! It's a typo, but we expect more from the "newspaper of record".

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...