Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Tsis­karidze & Lopatk­ina at the Vag­an­ova Bal­let Academy


  • Please log in to reply
201 replies to this topic

#61 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,901 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 02:35 PM

 

Some articles said that the rector's appointment would mean that all of the staff of the Vaganova's contracts would expire and be up to the rector to renew. So ... they can agree to this appointment, or be dismissed, or resign.

 

Appointment as in nomination?  Then, that sounds like a sentence Orwell could have written.  If it means approved appointment, then if they don't approve he would have nothing to say about their contracts, unless the next approved Rector was a puppet.  If they don't succeed in blocking his approval, then he could retaliate by refusing to renew their contracts.

 

 

Vera Dorofeeva resigned, so the articles (I can't find them now) say that all contracts have thus expired and are up to the incoming rector (Tsiskaridze) to renew or terminate. So basically ... they're already fired unless they approve.



#62 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,258 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 02:49 PM

This is all fascinating, and terrible, to me.  Back to the Bad Old Days?  Or is this the new century kicking in?  (there's no answer to those questions except time, of course.) My heart goes out to the artists in St. Petersburg.



#63 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,321 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 03:25 PM

How could they be entitled to vote if they've been fired?



#64 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,901 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 03:49 PM

http://www.ismeneb.c...ng_options.html

 

"The dismissal of the Rector automatically terminates the contracts of her deputies, including the artistic director."

 

I'm not sure how many teachers are considered deputies, but it sounds like their contracts are terminated until they are renewed by the new Rector? An offer you can't refuse.



#65 volcanohunter

volcanohunter

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,034 posts

Posted 31 October 2013 - 04:04 PM

If the contracts of "pro-rectors" expire automatically when the rector leaves his post, it would not necessarily follow that all instructors would find themselves in that boat. According to the Russian version of the Academy's web site, the school has six vice-rectors: Altynai Asylmuratova (artistic director), Alexei Fomkin (pedagogy and methodology), Tatiana Golovina (academic, educational and social work), Vyacheslav Isakov (research and development), Galina Taupeko (administration) and Olga Abramova (international relations).

 

http://www.vaganova....hp?id=20&pid=19



#66 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,901 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 08:43 AM

Vaganova teachers signing a petition:

 

http://www.infan.ru/news/?338920

 

Also, Vera Dorofeeva's name and picture have been removed from the Vaganova website.



#67 Catherine

Catherine

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 183 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 10:25 AM

The voting by staff is not to occur until next *summer*. News sources suggested January but the pedagogues here have told me it is closer to summer 2014. That's a LONG time (a full academic year essentially) before anything can be adjusted.



#68 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,321 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 10:58 AM

That explains Tsiskaridze's position that teachers who've started the year should finish the year. By next summer, maybe he thinks they'll like the way he's running things and the staff he's chosen, and if he decides, the deputies he re-hires.

It also means the voters will have nothing to say about it if Dorofeeva's prediction comes true and Gergiev takes over the studios for the Mariinsky during the main theater reno.

Dorofeeva has started a new job with the Mikhailovsky already. It's not surprising she was removed from the Vaganova site.

#69 Drew

Drew

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 12:36 PM

In an interview Tsiskaridze said that through the 1970's the Kirov used studios at the school. Does anyone know if that's correct? Or what it involved?  I'm asking because I'm trying to understand how "bad" it is for the company to use the school's studios when/if Mariinsky I is renovated. Of course, something that worked in the past may not be appropriate or practicable now, but I haven't altogether been able to understand why this issue, in particular, has become such a huge casus belli. I understand the ballet world's distrust of Gergiev (I share it), but however independent the school is--it still is proud of its role as the feeder school for the Mariinsky. They are linked institutions.



#70 Natalia

Natalia

    Rubies Circle

  • Foreign Correspondent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,398 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 12:47 PM

Yes, Drew, the company used the academy's studios until the major renovation to the Kirov Theatre added all of today's studios; I thought that it was in the late-60s, not 70s. The 'new' studios are in the long wing to the left of the main entrance of the theatre (when facing the facade).  

 

But wait a moment:  Doesn't the sparkling new Mariinsky II theatre contain beautiful new studios for both ballet and opera?



#71 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,321 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 01:00 PM

Supposedly the Marrinsky II ballet studios were skimped on. I'm not sure about the opera facilities.

It's also a very different situation from the '60's and '70's, no? Fewer ballets to rehearse, fewer tours, not being the cash cow to fund the opera on a slave-driver schedule.

#72 Drew

Drew

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 01:13 PM

My understanding was indeed that Mariinsky II, as per Natalia's ironic allusion, has no studios for the ballet company-only new facilities for the opera.  Of course, that's a problem, even shameful given the historic centrality of the ballet to the Mariinsky theater. But that doesn't entirely explain to me why leaders of the school should be so adamantly opposed to the idea of the company using its studios during the planned Mariinsky I renovation--given the historic precedent and indeed given that it would presumably be temporary. That is, only until the studios in Mariinsky I were renovated. (Admitedly, that's likely to be a long "temporary.") I assume that they have reasons for their dismay other than anger about the Mariinsky II situation, reasons having to do with the organization of the school etc. But it keeps being mentioned as a kind of absolute outrage that the company would use the school studios -- and I confess that puzzles me a little.

 

Edited to add: reading this over, it occurred to me that the atmosphere of anxiety of Gerviev's grand unification plan may be fueling antagonism to the idea of the company using the school's spaces. In other words, anything that smacks of "consolidation" is distrusted on the face of it. But I would be interested if there are other thoughts/information about this issue.

 

Further edited to add: I was corrected below--at any rate Mariinsky II has one ballet studio.



#73 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,321 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 01:18 PM

I thought the M-II had warm-up studios, but I may have mis-read that.

I think the school thinks that it will be squeezed out this time, giving the increased demands of the ballet. It won't be a co-mingling. I'm guessing that in any case, some private money could be found to find space to create temporary studios for either the company or school, but for the students, it's important for them to be in the historic studios, with all of the history, the portaits, and the ghosts to instill a sense of continuity.

#74 volcanohunter

volcanohunter

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,034 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 01:38 PM

Most interviewees have mentioned that Mariinsky-II has a single ballet studio.



#75 Drew

Drew

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts

Posted 01 November 2013 - 06:05 PM

... but for the students, it's important for them to be in the historic studios, with all of the history, the portaits, and the ghosts to instill a sense of continuity.

 

Absolutely agree ...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):