Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

La Bayadere


  • Please log in to reply
84 replies to this topic

#46 Ceeszi

Ceeszi

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 07:41 AM

I attended last night. I also attended Friday night with Vishneva/Gomes/Murphy.

Friday night was total magic. Last night was not, but there were many beautiful moments. I thought Smirnova was lovely. Her Nikiya was still a work in progress, but I was thrilled that she came to the Met and I would love to see her again. I had only seen her dance once before - at the 2012 Stars of the 21st Century Gala.

Muntagirov was the surprise for me last night. This is the first time I had seen him dance and I read the mixed reviews about him in the past, but he was really great last night. He was dynamic in his solos and he partnered Smirnova very well. There was not the Diana/Marcelo passion of Friday night.

Hee Seo acted the part of the spoiled princess but her dancing was not up to the standards of Murphy or Osipova (who danced Gamzatti two years ago).

I am going back tonight for Tereshkina/Shklyarov/Boylston.

#47 mimsyb

mimsyb

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 276 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 08:49 AM

OK, but if you have two people who barely know each other, as professionals and artists, they should be able to get past that and deliver a performance that is, if not sizzling, than is at least compatible. It's called "acting".  Dancers tell a story, both with their technique and their expressiveness.   This is not a year end recital.  It's the Met.   Or maybe this also goes to the degree of all the hiring of guest artists in the first place.  Maybe too much odd pairing is going on.  If the hiring is to continue (which given the current state of affairs seems to be the way), than why not bring two artists who actually dance together year round to the Met.  At least that way, they will have said hello before they step on the stage. I don't need "one for the ages" every single night, but  as an ardent and frequent ballet goer and one who spends excellent money for seats, I do expect a bit more from visiting artists than just the steps done to music.  I expect it from our local dancers also.  As I said.  It's the Met.  It's ABT.



#48 Golden Idol

Golden Idol

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 83 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 09:13 AM

I must agree with Mimsy. This was an extremely low-wattage pairing for Bayadere, which is really all about passion and passion thwarted. Although I thought both Olga and Vadim were very elegant dancers, there was little or no emotional conviction behind the steps. He, in particular, was expressionless throughout; if you told me he was jet-lagged, I'd believe you. His manege in the Shades act had a great finish, but until then it was on autopilot. Oddly, their mutual lack of...what was the term used above...sizzle--made them seem like a well-matched couple, since neither outdid the other, neither injected their roles with "that little something extra," and both gave very fluid, if detached, performances.



#49 Mirseng1

Mirseng1

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 09:18 AM

Again would agree with "mimsyb".  Dancers tell a story - regardless of their placement within the company (guest artist vs. permanent member of the company).  Drama was missing (for me) in yesterday's performance despite of all the technical abilities of two - undoubtedly - talented artists.

 

I am also going back tonight for Tereshkina/Shklyarov/Boylston.  Will be interesting to compare two pairs of guest artists to see whether there is an issue of "guesting", or individual performers' abilities.
 



#50 onxmyxtoes

onxmyxtoes

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 09:33 AM

That was an issue with the guesting that someone here brought up a few years back.  The guests don't have the rapport and camaraderie with the corps and soloists like the "home" principals have.  You can tell when Gomes or Murphy acknowledges the other dancers that it is genuine.  When you fly someone in for 72 hours to do a ballet, you can't get the same product.  It's called a company for a reason!



#51 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,765 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 09:39 AM

Since Tereshkina and Shkylarov are regularly paired together at the Mariinsky, lack of familiarity will not be an issue for them.



#52 nanushka

nanushka

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 143 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 09:54 AM

OK, but if you have two people who barely know each other, as professionals and artists, they should be able to get past that and deliver a performance that is, if not sizzling, than is at least compatible. It's called "acting".  Dancers tell a story, both with their technique and their expressiveness.   This is not a year end recital.  It's the Met.   Or maybe this also goes to the degree of all the hiring of guest artists in the first place.  Maybe too much odd pairing is going on.  If the hiring is to continue (which given the current state of affairs seems to be the way), than why not bring two artists who actually dance together year round to the Met.  At least that way, they will have said hello before they step on the stage. I don't need "one for the ages" every single night, but  as an ardent and frequent ballet goer and one who spends excellent money for seats, I do expect a bit more from visiting artists than just the steps done to music.  I expect it from our local dancers also.  As I said.  It's the Met.  It's ABT.

 

Agreed, and I don't think we should be getting "works in progress" from guest artists, which is what several here have called Smirnova's Nikiya.  (I was not there.)  We can (and should!) be getting "works in progress" from ABT's own soloists instead!  How are they supposed to grow as artists within the company if they never get to dance the company's signature roles and if the company is instead giving those very opportunities for "progress" to non-company performers?  It's one thing to have a Cojocaru come in and give a performance -- I do not like her dancing, personally, but even I would not say her performances are "works in progress."  It's quite another thing to be giving one of the company's precious few evenings on the Met stage to an artist from outside who doesn't yet have a finished product to put forth.



#53 FauxPas

FauxPas

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 521 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 10:02 AM

I attended on Tuesday and Wednesday nights.  Both were largely well-danced performances with striking features but were not transcendent dramatic experiences.

 

Tuesday May 27, 2014 - Murphy, Nedak, Boylston, Zhurbin:  Murphy has strong technique and has been well-coached in this part.  However, the kind of delicate romantic lyricism underpinned by iron-strong classical technique that is the essence of Nikiya is not her thing.  Her phrasing was strong and direct but seemed athletic and the element of spirituality was more a surface affect rather than something inherent in her phrasing.  After having seen Vishneva, Part, Semionova and even the young, undeveloped Smirnova in the role, I have come to believe you have to be Russian or at least Slavic and Russian-trained like the Roumanian Cojocaru to capture this quality.  Nina Ananiashvili had it in spades.  I could see that Murphy was coming off an injury in the strain she showed in some of her arabesques. Notably in her harem-pants solo in the Garden Betrothal Scene at the end of (ABT's) first act, the sequence where she does an arabesque on pointe and then lowers the foot and goes into a deep penchée showed uncharacteristic stiffness and strain.  However, Gillian in the "Shades" scene did have strong unsupported pirouettes in the scarf variation and fast diagonals of piques in the coda.

 

I suspect that Natalia Makarova recommended Denys Nedak to Kevin McKenzie after having taught him the role of Solor when she set her staging of "Bayadere" for the National Ballet of Ukraine.  Like Matvienko and Maxim Beloserkovsky, he was trained at Kiev.  He is a fine dancer - tall, well-built with clear, strong technique and is a good partner who is extremely attentive to his ballerina.  One always knew that Murphy was in very good hands - like Marcelo.  Nedak has a virile authoritative stage presence with excellent mime - he commanded the stage.  His solos went very well but unfortunately he had one very bad moment just before the grand pas de deux in the "Shades" scene - he had series of turns and was to land on one knee before Nikiya as shade enters.  Nedak unfamiliar with the stage either slipped or misjudged his landing and took a very bad spill on his backside.  He quickly recovered and delivered the same flawless performance he had given us at all other times.  Except for that one bad spill it was a near-perfect rendering of the role.  

 

Isabella Boylston continues to gain authority as Gamzatti and her dancing had a lot of strength and panache.  I particularly like her solo in the third act but I also have loved Murphy, Herrera and Dvorovenko in that solo as well.  Christine Schevchenko danced the first shade with great speed and vivacity but without the lightness and clarity that Sarah Lane brings to it.  Devon Teuscher showed strength and pliancy in the difficult variation for the second shade while Katherine Williams had all the steps but not the phrasing and articulation for the third shade's variation - she is very promising though.  Roman Zhurbin's High Brahmin glowered like a young Herbert Lom but seemed a younger more insecure priest than Victor Barbee's mean old lech.  He seemed to have genuine feelings other than lust for Nikiya and regretted his vengeful actions against her.  Major role debut: Zhiyao Zhang as the Golden Idol - very exciting, high-flying, fast and precise and one of the best since Simkin, Corella and Cornejo.

 

Wednesday May 28, 2014 - Smirnova, Muntagirov, Seo, Zhurbin:  Smirnova's oval face has an exquisite almost oriental beauty that reminded me of Asymuratova while her elongated supple body reminds me of Guillem and Zakharova without the exaggerated extensions and gymnastic edges.  Smirnova's dancing is effortless, smooth and serene like spun silk - that is both her glory and currently, her big defect.  It all looks too easy and lacks tension - musical and dramatic.  Vishneva current level of technique can't match Smirnova's flawless pirouettes and turns but every movement has emotional significance and tension.  However, I first saw Diana Vishneva in her early twenties on tour with the Kirov in 1999 as Giselle and Aurora and she was not the dramatic powerhouse she developed into later with ABT and other companies.  She was a very pretty young girl with gorgeous perfect technique and lovely training - the interpretations were conventional and lovely but not individual or revealing.  The full artistry came later.  So it will be with Smirnova - everything is there but in latent form.  Muntagirov really danced superbly but he has never shown a lot of dramatic spark - however he was an ardent partner in his first act pas de deux with Smirnova's Nikiya.  I thought his solos were stunningly buoyant and secure and he has grown immensely in the part in two years.  Hee Seo also built on her dancing performance from Monday night - managing to add some acceleration to her single fouettes in the Pas D'Action coda and even doing a multiple at the end.  I think that both Smirnova and Muntagirov are beautiful dancers and would happily see more of them.  But they are both young and developing - it is a luxury to be able to compare them in the same week with finished artists like Vishneva, Part, Semionova, Gomes and Cojocaru.  This is one luxury I haven't been able to deny myself going every night including tonight for Tereshkina and Shklyarov!



#54 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 10:11 AM

The question is more how guests Tereshkina and Shklyarov will interact with Boylston and the rest of the ABT ranks.  Tereshkina and Shklyarov are two of the greatest artists dancing now, but a warning that Tereshkina registers on the cold side compared to a Vishneva or Zakharova or Obraztsova.  That's a quality I prize, and if I were in NYC and had to choose one cast, it would be Tereshkina, even were she meeting her partner five minutes before curtain, but it's not everyone's cup of tea.



#55 abatt

abatt

    Sapphire Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,765 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 10:23 AM

I agree with most of what Faux Pas said above, with a couple of caveats.  I thought Murphy was disappointing.  She lacked fluidity and lyricism.  She is a much better Gamzatti.  Regarding Nedak, he was very engaging.  Good actor.  Tall, strong presence. Good technique, but not a flashy trickster. A very elegant dancer.  I also must mention the Bronze Idol on Tues. evening, Z. Zhang.  He is one to watch.  Though he can definitely use some additional polishing, he was the best of the Idol's I've seen this season, and he seems to have very strong technique.

 

I thought Semionova's Nikiya on Monday evening was her best performance with ABT.  She is often bland, but this role suited her well.  Her gorgeous line and extension were marvelous.



#56 Ceeszi

Ceeszi

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 144 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 12:36 PM

The question is more how guests Tereshkina and Shklyarov will interact with Boylston and the rest of the ABT ranks.  Tereshkina and Shklyarov are two of the greatest artists dancing now, but a warning that Tereshkina registers on the cold side compared to a Vishneva or Zakharova or Obraztsova.  That's a quality I prize, and if I were in NYC and had to choose one cast, it would be Tereshkina, even were she meeting her partner five minutes before curtain, but it's not everyone's cup of tea.


I saw Tereshkina as Gamzatti back in 2008 when the Mariinsky came to DC. The coldness was perfect for the role of the Princess Gamzatti and her dancing was superb. Her coldness was a perfect contrast to Vishneva's Nikiya.

The next time I saw her was as Aurora when the Mariinsky came to DC in 2010. There, the lack of warmth was a hindrance. Again, her dancing was gorgeous, but at that performance I ended up watching Kondaurova as the Lilac Fairy more than her. Shklyarov was Prince Desiree at that performance, but he was still a work in progress back then. The next time I saw Shklyarov was when the Mariinsky came to the Met in 2011. I saw him in Symphony in C and I marveled at his growth as a dancer and as an artist.

I am really looking forward to tonight's performance and seeing Tereshkina and Shklyarov again. I also want to see how Isabella Boylston holds her ground as Gamzatti.

#57 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 01:06 PM

The Mariinsky Ballet posted about the performance with a rehearsal photo of Tereshkina and Shklyarov to its (English) Facebook page and also tweeted a link to the FB entry:

 

https://www.facebook...680572681977927



#58 Dunham16

Dunham16

    New Member

  • New Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 03:12 PM

The three dancers are schooled differently, hence approach their roles from different perspectives even when their work melds together dramatically into a storyboard whole. One does not need biographical information to quickly grasp Shkylarov is from the Kirov, Semionova is from Berlin via the Bolshoi school and Seo is not Russian in training. With the cast changes and apparent limited rehearsal time discussed earlier in more formal published reviews.there was an issue in the pas de huit.  With the stages of both the Royal in London and and the Met narrower than the Russian stages, the cast change and the otherwise noted limited rehearsal time Shkylarov had an issue with the dance floor he certainly did not experience when he danced recently Ivan in THE LITTLE HUMPBACKED HORSE on the Met stage with a Russian laid dance floor. Two pas de huit dancers were too close to him and were nearly in an accident but Vladimir, an experienced performer, managed to avoid this and stay in character. Following the pas de huit, Shkylarov and Seo soon have back to back variations and Semionova a major dance sequence several minutes later. All were well done yet from different ballet perspectives. What really came together were Shkylarov and Semioniva onstage and the concertmaster in the wings for the violin solo in the grand pas de deux and the true glory of the execution of the closing movement of the grand pas which rocked the house as one of the most exciting renditions i have seen over the years in more than forty performances by different companies.



#59 Mathilde K

Mathilde K

    Senior Member

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 195 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 10:44 PM

 


OK, but if you have two people who barely know each other, as professionals and artists, they should be able to get past that and deliver a performance that is, if not sizzling, than is at least compatible. It's called "acting".  Dancers tell a story, both with their technique and their expressiveness.   This is not a year end recital.  It's the Met.   Or maybe this also goes to the degree of all the hiring of guest artists in the first place.  Maybe too much odd pairing is going on.  If the hiring is to continue (which given the current state of affairs seems to be the way), than why not bring two artists who actually dance together year round to the Met.  At least that way, they will have said hello before they step on the stage. I don't need "one for the ages" every single night, but  as an ardent and frequent ballet goer and one who spends excellent money for seats, I do expect a bit more from visiting artists than just the steps done to music.  I expect it from our local dancers also.  As I said.  It's the Met.  It's ABT.

 
Agreed, and I don't think we should be getting "works in progress" from guest artists, which is what several here have called Smirnova's Nikiya.  (I was not there.)  We can (and should!) be getting "works in progress" from ABT's own soloists instead!  How are they supposed to grow as artists within the company if they never get to dance the company's signature roles and if the company is instead giving those very opportunities for "progress" to non-company performers?  It's one thing to have a Cojocaru come in and give a performance -- I do not like her dancing, personally, but even I would not say her performances are "works in progress."  It's quite another thing to be giving one of the company's precious few evenings on the Met stage to an artist from outside who doesn't yet have a finished product to put forth.
 
I share your sentiments. Unfortunately, this has been McKenzie's policy, for good or bad. The policy is certainly detrimental to the company's own dancers. Concerning Smirnova, she is still very much "a work in progress". Her "stardom", after all, was created by Filin who put all the resources at his disposal to develop her technically and artistically as a dancer. From the very beginning he has been casting her in leading parts in spite of multiple signs that she was not ready for many of those roles. No young ballerina has been as favored and promoted at Bolshoi as her for as long as I can remember. Olga is a very serious young woman, she was ready for the challenge from the start, seemingly unaffected by jealousy and "wishing her ill" by those in the troupe who were sidelined by Filin. That, however, only deepened the internal divisions and tensions in the troupe.

#60 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,349 posts

Posted 29 May 2014 - 11:52 PM

No AD can make any dancer a star.  Filin can give a dancer opportunities and marketing machines can publicize the dancer to the hilt, but the public decides whether a dancer is a star, or as it has been seen many, many times, the public decides that they're not interested in a dancer who is forced on them.  It is hardly a unique occurrence when an Artistic Director pushes a young dancer, and there is resentment within the company against that dancer.  As far as why an AD pushes a dancer, we have a strict "official news" policy on Ballet Alert!, and that's the limit of what can be discussed here.

 

Smirnova's performances haven't been universally lauded, but she has been embraced by much of the public and critics.  Whether ABT should hire a rising, young star instead of only guest artists who are in their primes and leave the growth to company members is a question. 




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):