Drew

Thank you @Rosa for posting the clip...

Congratulations to all the dancers. (I only saw Kaneko in secondary roles when I last saw the Royal, but she definitely caught my eye.)

Like @ECatI was thinking I would be interested in seeing Illiushkina essay Giselle--it seems a temperamental fit.
In an case, I'm pleased to read she continues to be cast in major roles and is getting more than one shot at them. And very much hope she is on next year's tour to D.C.!

Very saddened to read about Zaleev--wishing him a full recovery!

5 hours ago, silvermash said:

24/09 Gala : Défilé du ballet/Clouds Inside (Voelker)/Brise-lames (Jalet)/Etudes (Lander)
28/09-6/12 Play (Ekman)
15/10-04/11 Le Rouge et le noir (Lacotte)
29/11-02/01 le sacre du printemps (Nijinski) / l'après midi d'un faune (Eyal) / Rhapsody (Ashton)
09/12-02/01 Don Quichotte (Nureyev)
30/01-20/02 Body and soul (Pite)
14/03-03/04 Uprising / In Your Rooms (Schechter)
02/04-06/05 La Bayadère (Nureyev)
06/05-05/06 Carmen/Another Place / Bolero (Mats Ek)
18/06-16/07 A Midsummer Night's Dream (Balanchine)
25/06-16/07 Giselle (Coralli-Perrot)

Thank you for posting. Are you excited by any thing in particular? (I see a number of things that sound pretty appealing.)

My mind immediately flashed back to Salvatore Licitra ... May Zaleev fare more happily.

4 hours ago, Buddy said:

What appears to be an interesting debut, Alyona Kovalyova as Mekhmene Banu in Yuri Grigorovich's famous classic, The Legend of Love, May 29.

Scanning the castings over the years, this has been a role that has generally been given to Maria Alexandrova, Ekaterina Shipulina and Ekaterina Krysanova, all appearing in this series, and Maria Allash, who's now Olga Smirnova's coach.

 

Regarding casting over the years (not speaking of this series)....I'd add Zakharova. Don't know if it's a role she still dances. (Perhaps not if she hasn't been cast this go round... )

40 minutes ago, vipa said:

I've been ignoring the idea of renewing my NYCB subscription, for a number of reasons, laziness included. I got an actual mailing today and looked through it. Some things bother me. Correct me if I've made factual errors. 

It seems they re doing Symphony in C on opening night and not again. Am I correct? Why rehearse for one show? Slaughter is on two different programs. I don't mind seeing it, occasionally but don't want to see it several times a year. There is a strong focus on new choreography. I know this is a particular love of Wendy Whelan's. I don't want NYCB to be a museum, however I do want it to remain unique. They do the Balanchine rep like no other company. Do I really need to see NYCB do so many works that other companies could do as well or better?

Maybe I'm just an old fogey but I want more Balanchine rep, and more careful programing of the works.

Needless to say I'm not convinced a subscription is a good idea this go-round.

It was interesting to me to read your comments--oh! as I'm typing @cobweb just weighed in as well.  I have tentatively decided against a trip to NY in Fall, strong emotions notwithstanding -- and there will probably be a lot of emotion in the theater and onstage. My reasoning is that not one single weekend do the two programs promise enough that (for me) qualifies as "must" see/can't live without -- and it's very hard to justify travel expenses for a weekend even when I factor in that sometimes the programs or ballets I'm less excited about turn out to be much better than expected and that all of it is bound to be good in some fashion.  (It's an expensive trip.) Each weekend there was one ballet, where I thought--yes, I'd come up for that (including 21st-century works) and maybe one or two other ballets where I thought 'well, that could be interesting' or 'that would be nice,' but taken altogether I was a wee bit deflated by the programming.

It did occur to me that perhaps the problem was me and not the programming--I know I'm far from mentally "post-Covid--but, as I say, it was interesting to me to read Vipa's and Cobweb's reaction to the season.

On a different note I enjoyed the gala -- the whole thing, but especially the two male solos (and I consider myself a decidedly ballerina-centric fan). The opening Robbins solo looked as if it could have been created for this specific occasion of the return to the State Theater...a dancer in a studio resuming his dancing life...and I found that quite magical. (And the way the camera just flowed with the casualness of it.) And I found the new Justin Peck solo for Huxley terribly moving--I guess it could just have been the Barber adagio for strings having its patented tear-jerking impact, but I think Peck and Huxley played a role too. And it had a wonderful resonance with the Robbins. Huxley's dancing, too, as mediated by the black and white film, was just breathtakingly beautiful. What a great dancer. And hurray for Sophia Coppola--

9 hours ago, California said:

Am I the only person disappointed that Mariinsky is bringing Jewels to the Kennedy Center? Classic Balanchine, but so readily available in performances and recordings (Medici and Marquee both have the Mariinsky Jewels). I'm wondering if the US sensitivity to cultural appropriation and offenses is making presenters nervous. La Bayadere has known problems with brown-face.

Pre pandemic they were talking about a contemporary/20th-century program at Ken Cen with Push Comes to Shove (which Kim dances) and, I think, Serenade on the program as well. In that context, well, I'd rather see Jewels. I had wondered if post pandemic it would be Swan Lake. Which, since it's the Mariinsky, I could definitely live with and enjoy. In my fantasy, I was hoping (or, really, just daydreaming)  Sleeping Beauty--either version they do, though presumably touring with the Sergeyev production is easier. So would Jewels have been my first choice? No ...but it's far from last choice!

3 hours ago, ECat said:

@Drew You are in for a very special treat with the Mariinsky performing  Jewels.  They performed that in Los Angeles a couple of years ago and it was fantastic.  I had the pleasure of seeing Maria Iliushkina in the second PDD in Emeralds.  This was my first time ever seeing her and she was truly "lovely" as you say.  She has a delicateness and fragility about her while still being a strong technician.  I was especially taken by her doll-like features.  She really is beautiful.  

I think I have to adjust my eye a little when watching the Mariinsky dance Balanchine...But I am certainly very much looking forward to the April Jewels -- assuming no lingering pandemic problems get in the way. And I'm hoping Illiushkina will be on the tour!

Count me another who very much enjoyed the footage of the recent Skorik/Kim Giselle. Both of them seem to have grown in their respective roles --with the caveat that I'm basing this on past video footage not actual performances -- and looked beautiful together. (Her neck and arms in Act II...sigh).

Caveats? I have developed a high tolerance for high extensions in Giselle (to me, it seems an old story), but maybe in one or two spots I might have preferred them not quite so very high...

I am very pleased, too, with what I have seen of Illiushkina in Raymonda. Some of her earliest outings in solos, on video and the one time I saw her live, as enchanting as I found them, did not necessarily give me the impression of the consistent stamina or strength needed for successful full length outings. But the company has given her the opportunities and if video is anything to go by, she is rising to the challenge. Loveliness (the word @Buddy) used) Illiushkina surely has.  I would love to see her again in D.C. when the company comes with Jewels.

Atlanta Ballet has been giving live, outdoor performances at Georgia Tech, performing their Silver Linings program(s) to modest audiences organized into pods of 2 or 4 with each pod seated in separate temporary enclaves. They also arranged a food truck for before the performance, so you can sit in your little enclave and eat (I guess). It sounded fun and I'd like to have attended or attend this coming weekend when there will be more performances. Unfortunately it's not in the cards.

In fact I'm not sure how many people were there last weekend--the video they posted suggested not many as did the very positive review they received--but they did perform live and will be this weekend as well. Both programs being done include the new Claudia Schreier work Pleiades Dances.

I just saw on FB or Instagram (can't remember which) that live May fundraiser party has been postponed to September due to people not being ready to venture out to a party.  I feel for the dancers and the company...but it's tough times all round.

Here's the Arts Atlanta review of the performance this past weekend:

https://www.artsatl.org/review-atlanta-ballet-makes-a-strong-return-with-schreiers-pleiades-dances/

Quite interesting reading about this...Traditionally one of the values of having an in-house choreographer would be that s/he could put their stamp on the company style. (Of course that is both more likely to happen and more valuable when your in-house choreographer is Balanchine or Ashton.) It also may benefit dancers, but even more so the choreographer to be able to develop a collaboration in a stable situation over time. When Justin Peck first got a permanent position with NYCB, he talked about this issue saying that when he is invited to a company other than NYCB they want a recognizable "Justin Peck Ballet"  while having a steady position as a choreographer at NYCB freed him up to try all kinds of different stuff even if it failed. That said, when a less than great choreographer is dominating the repertory, it is bound to be less than thrilling for audiences. It still does kind of feel as though Tomasson has earned the right to have this season be something of a tribute to his directorship. 

And I don't doubt all ballet companies are facing money issues in the wake of the pandemic. Everyone seems to be falling back, too, on tried and true works that they think are likely to sell. We can hope people are eager to return to the theater--I'm guessing most of us are, though I have mixed feelings myself--but there are presumably worries about audiences having lost the habit.  I think that's reflected in Kennedy Center programming:  someone pointed out they are bringing in three (count 'em) THREE Nutcrackers. And ABT is doing a week of Don Q. and NYCB a week of Midsummer's Night Dream. I'm happy about the Mariinsky Jewels--but it's not the most daring thing they could have chosen even amongst their full length works. Honestly by comparison, though it's just the one company, ballet-wise I'm more intrigued by what's happening in San Francisco in the coming year. (Though that's a fantasy for me since I don't think I can get there on the dates that appeal to me.)

Marguerite Porter bore a striking facial resemblance to Fonteyn. I don't believe she danced like Fonteyn or on that "level"--and I vaguely suspect that the resemblance may have ultimately hobbled her career at the Royal as well as helping it. But a much closer Royal Ballet watcher than myself would have to weigh in....

Croce remarked Stephanie Saland's resemblance to Kirkland--and I agree, though Saland seemed to me a more...well...glamorous version. In this case I'd say a facial and bodily resemblance, which meant that their lines sometimes looked similar, or to me they did,  I don't know that it went further than that...

A wonderful life!   Rest happily Jacques D'amboise!

Very sorry to learn of this. I never had the chance to meet her, but her tours sounded fascinating and I sometimes fantasized about going on one. As I always enjoyed reading her posts, I thought I would enjoy meeting her one day as well....Sending best thoughts to her friends and family.

Just learned a few minutes ago, through an announcement on Atlanta Ballet's FB page, that one of the company's best dancers, Jackie Nash, is departing.  She has long been one of Atlanta Ballet's strongest and most reliable dancers --often (as in their Nutcracker where she played  ...well...a super adorable and graceful chicken) one of the most charming and witty as well. I missed her Effie in Sylphide but she was terrific leading the highland reel at the performance I attended.  I also got a kick out of the fact that one of the teachers at the school where she trained in Connecticut was, years earlier, one of my ballet teachers. She will be much missed. She is, however, not retiring, as the company announcement makes clear, but departing for Atlanta-based Terminus Modern Ballet Theater. (Latter was founded by former Atlanta Ballet company dancers--several of whom left on their own steam while others were pushed as Nedvigin went into his second year as company Director.)

When I went to Instagram to set up a link to the announcement of Nash's departure,  it was "OH NO!!" as I found out there that Moisés Martin is also departing. Martin--probably known to some on this site from his career at other companies including San Francisco ballet--is an elegant dancer and, as best I can judge as an audience member, also a skillful partner.  When I saw him, he made an especially attractive pair with Jessica Assef. As far as I can guess from company bios etc. he must be around 40 so it doesn't seem shocking he would leave, but it's still a loss to the company.  (I suppose a careful reading of my previous posts on performances in which he appeared might lead one to suspect that his appearance on stage made me swoon, but I'm not confirming one way or another .)  Links to Instagram posts about both of these wonderful dancers below--both posts include video fragments of their dancing:

https://www.instagram.com/p/CN8YZmeFqSP/

https://www.instagram.com/p/CN8w1HwgeCp/

Just now, pherank said:

 

That's an interesting take on things. I can't say that I agree that it goes that far - for most of these social media commenters. If you asked them directly, "Are the people who reported Scarlett's misbehavior to blame for his suicide?", I'll bet you will hear, "that's not what I meant."

For those who would respond that way, and mean it, well, I could wish they would choose their words more carefully.

(I think a lot of ballet fans just wish the larger problem would go away -- and that's not a recipe that seems likely to protect future talent whether we are thinking of dancers on the receiving end of mistreatment or rising stars given leeway because..."genius" or some such.)

55 minutes ago, pherank said:

Imo, Cancel Culture has not earned a pass. It is not unequivocally riotous. Not even close.

'But it's disheartening to me, too, that his death is being automatically "blamed" in part on people who, it is very possible--in my opinion, probable--were themselves victims'

> I haven't noticed this myself - the anger around Scarlett's suicide is not being automatically directed at his "victims". It's had nothing to do with that.

Just as I was typing this @canbelto responded and I think that response is pertinent.

I will say that I think you (Pherank) are right that the word "automatically" was not well chosen, but I wouldn't say the anger around Scarlett's suicide has "nothing" to do with victim blaming as you do. I have seen a lot of comments on "rumor"  and "insinuation"--as if the person commenting somehow knew that was all the Royal Ballet had to go on and no-one had actually experienced or testified to anything first hand; also generalized remarks about how anyone can say anything out of spite and questioning why the accusers didn't have to come forward publicly and lots on Twitter (often by people who seem not to know much about the case) declaring that Scarlett was "cleared," was innocent etc. -- how he is another victim of puritanism, of people launching accusations and having them taken seriously when there is no evidence:  you can also see some of this in the responses on FB to Ratmansky's comments when he posted them there.  To me, this clearly implies blame of whoever brought the original concerns to authorities at the school and company, not exclusive blame, but blame. (And I agree with Canbelto that this blame is there in some cases where people don't think of themselves as victim blaming. And of course for many people the issue is that they don't believe there were any victims. Or they believe that the accusations were brought by dancers/students/workers who didn't suffer anything we should take very seriously. I'm not one of those people.)

It may clarify my perspective if I speak "hypothetically:" if I had filed a complaint about a co-worker and later heard people speak this way about the case, using these phrases, then I would certainly feel that I was one of the people being blamed for the fall out.  And that my concerns were being belittled and marginalized.

Another hypothetical: if I am angry at a ballet company director for firing someone for behavior that an internal investigation found was  inappropriate for the workplace, what does that say -- if only indirectly -- about my view of that behavior and of the people who complained about it?

My other thoughts about the nuances of the case, what we do and don't know, what I personally do and don't believe, my emotions in response to the suicide etc. were expressed above in my original post. I will repeat just one thought which is that it was always my hope that over time Scarlett would be able to re-assume a place within the ballet world. (How exactly? Not sure...My few  ideas about that, which assume he lost his position for a reason, are rather stereo-typically American, eg I used to picture some kind of therapeutic narrative...and it would have taken time.)

@canbeltoI am sorry you went through such a horrible ordeal. I'm grateful you are with us (even if I can only really know you online)--

In thinking about Scarlett's death, I keep thinking about finding a middle way through these issues. In my eyes, Scarlett was young enough that it should have been possible for him to have a second act--he might have been given (or taken) the chance to grow up and act differently. Certainly, his death is extremely shocking and saddening to me.

But it's disheartening to me, too, that his death is being automatically "blamed" in part on people who, it is very possible--in my opinion, probable--were themselves victims.  I'll add that from the time of his "fall" from ballet grace, I wondered if more couldn't have been done to intervene in his behavior when he was developing as a choreographer and leader in the ballet world. He seems to have been pegged as a future choreographic superstar very young and that may have gotten in the way of certain kinds of mentoring--along with ballet's long-standing (and I would say problematic) attitudes about what is and isn't appropriate in the studio and the theater.

I'm writing based on the belief that the Royal Ballet did not cut ties with Scarlett based on a casual rumor.  (And Denmark is not exactly known for American style puritanism.) I just don't find it plausible that there weren't problems that had to be addressed. Moreover, the Royal kept the investigation out of the public eye for a period of many months; it only became known to the public when it was more or less over. That was a way of protecting Scarlett--if the investigation had truly turned up nothing only Royal ballet "insiders" (and maybe not all of them) would have known anything about it.

The problem for public discussions of this is that we don't exactly know why he was terminated. The investigation didn't lead to criminal action--that was a good thing for Scarlett too. But, as has already been said, not every investigation has to lead to criminal action for there to be a need to take action in the workplace.  Still, no-one in the general public really knows exactly what was involved --  he wasn't "cleared" exactly but there was nothing to "pursue" (which is not the same as saying nothing went down) and then he loses his position with the company.  Anyway, no-one who can officially or publicly say what was involved seems able to do so--perhaps for legal reasons--or has done so.  For all we know the silences are protecting the accused as well as the accusers. I have certainly known of such cases in my own workplace.

But we don't know. We also don't know whether anyone who had worked with Scarlett in a position of authority tried to give him guidance/help of any kind after ties were cut with the Royal. (I recognize it might have been tricky to do so.) So basically, a lot of unknowns. Maybe the Royal over-reacted; maybe they didn't. Given his importance to them, it seems to me they had a lot of incentive not to over-react. Maybe the Royal Danish Ballet was playing it cautious; maybe they had good reason to act.

So, yes, greater transparency would be great --and it is surely part of the answer going forward--but I don't think we should assume that it's a magical panacea or necessarily produces fair resolutions.  For one thing, it is not only the accused who take a beating when accusations come out; accusers who speak out publicly also take a beating. Often a much worse one, especially if they are accusing someone loved or popular. And I won't even start on research into who gets believed and who doesn't when sexual accusations are made.  (Since Kavanaugh was mentioned above, it's worth noticing that even the "perfect" victim, in that very different context, Christine Blasey Ford, was unable to impact the outcome of the hearing.)

Forgiving flaws and understanding that humans are...uh...human isn't and shouldn't be the same as saying there should never be any consequences or that no-one should ever lose a job. So, there has to be a middle way--to me, the sloganeering against "cancel culture" misses the point as much as ex-communicating Scarlett from ballet for all eternity does.

Thank you @pherankfor drawing attention to this.  This video has footage of Mary Ellen Moylan dancing Sugar Plum Fairy and Sanguinic. It opens with Tallchief talking about her but also includes an interview with her. Likely others have seen this video--I'm quite sure I have--but this seemed an appropriate place to post again. I would have loved to see her dance! May she rest in peace-

Lovely news-congratulations to her!

I had actually stopped checking out her blog, but am glad to be reminded. And glad she is back writing!

Except for Nutcracker I'd be interested in seeing all of these programs. (I'm perhaps more curious than optimistic about the Raymonda, but I am that...)

45 minutes ago, volcanohunter said:

She mentions being glad that she was able to dance the premiere of Christian Spuck's Orlando before she became ill. She was forced to withdraw from one of her performances, leading Maria Vinogradova to dance the part three times in two days.

I saw some video of Vinogradova with Belyakov that I liked better than I expected, though I guess that should be under Bolshoi not Mariinsky...

From the Instagram account--VolcanoHunter doesn't need Googletranslate (!) but for those of us who do (Buddy gave this translation as well):

"Friends, I regret to inform you that my next performances have been canceled due to an illness that overtook me. A special pain is the cancellation of a performance in my native Petersburg. I think that I have withstood resistance in an epidemic for a long time and often went on stage instead of sick colleagues ... but I am grateful to fate, which gave me a recent wonderful premiere in the Orlando ballet staged for me. Be healthy and take care of yourself and your loved ones."

The link comes with a photo I found rather striking...

https://www.instagram.com/p/CM9fnSnAiFs/

39 minutes ago, canbelto said:

Olga Smirnova is canceling performances. She is extremely ill.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CM9fnSnAiFs/

Best wishes for a full recovery.

Deeply distressing...The instagram indirectly indicates this is Covid. (She mentions how fortunate she has been not to get it before this time.)

Indeed wishing her a FULL recovery!!!