Jump to content


ABT Swan Lake


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 stan

stan

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 16 June 2001 - 10:45 AM

What's the deal with the two Rothbarts? Is this just Kevin trying to be different or is there some dramatic point which completely escaped me?

In Friday's performance, Julie Kent was lovely, although she isn't my favorite Swan Queen. Corella, typically, was all flash and little substance. Needless to say, the audience went wild.

#2 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,246 posts

Posted 16 June 2001 - 11:22 AM

Thank you, Stan Bowker. This will be one of my favorite posts of all time. PLEASE post more often!!!

(I cannot answer your excellent question, for I am not the Delphic oracle, but I think there's a dramatic point. Perhaps Rothbart will plead that he's a multiple personality if the case ever comes to trial?)

#3 Drew

Drew

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,234 posts

Posted 16 June 2001 - 03:59 PM

I also went Friday night -- I have a lot of problems with this production, but overall enjoyed myself. I have always thought, though, that there is one Rothbart (a magical nature creature) who disguises himself as a nobleman in order to enchant his victims. Personally I find all of Mckenzie's choreography for this production awkward and unflattering (and there's quite a bit of it) and the elaboration of Rothbart's "character" unpersuasive, but, hmm, I do always enjoy watching Malakhov ...

I don't think Corella is without substance -- I find his dancing at times quite beautiful (as opposed to just flashy) and I thought he at least tried to make his big act III solos expressions of delight and excitement. I do think he's a little young and temperamentally boyish for this part. There are emotional notes he just doesn't have (yet?). Kent is not an ideal match for him (a little too tall for one thing) which aggravates the problem. The encounters between them definitely seemed as if between a human and an entirely otherworldly creature (more Firebird than Swan Lake), and that skimps some of the ballet's interpretive possibilities. Though I do like the Act IV image in this production in which she is standing atop the rocks and he is below her kneeling on them and looking upwards -- and Friday evening, that about summed the way Corella seemed to relate to Julie Kent throughout. This was the best I have seen Kent -- she WAS lovely -- but not terribly compelling emotionally either. She did bring a wonderful, almost patronizing allure to the final seconds of the black swan pas de deux. (I think it would be fair, though, to characterize the fouettes as determined.)

The pas de trois was very interesting. Herman Cornejo was just wonderful -- he has an extraordinary spring to his jumps, but also brings a lot of attention and care to the details of his dancing. You feel he is paying attention. Xiomara Reyes danced beautifully, though she seemed a bit precious. Erica Cornejo has something like her brother's spring and the jumps were remarkably high in a woman dancer. Other qualities of her dancing were more uneven (to me) -- but the jumping, wow! I also enjoyed a number of the women in the character dancing of Act III, especially Stella Abrera and Carmen Corella in the Spanish dance. Otherwise the company dancing as a whole was pretty good, but uneven in patches (first Swan Lake of the season though, so it's likely to get better). And there were some nice details in the miming in Act I etc. -- peasants too nervous to look directly at the Prince etc.

[ 06-16-2001: Message edited by: Drew ]

#4 Autumn7

Autumn7

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts

Posted 17 June 2001 - 01:02 PM

Re: The 2 Von Rothbarts - I saw McKenzie speak in a seminar last year before the premiere of his Swan Lake and he said that his villain was 'a shape-shifter, evil personified'. This made me think of the X-Files but it clarified the fact that von Rothbart really is one personality that changes form at will. I also felt that when we first see him camouflaged as part of the tree that that meant that he was a universal symbol of evil in the natural world and thus in us all. (Sounds overly simplistic but it worked for me)
I wonder if the ballet has changed since those performances in DC? I liked the overall production but I remember that none of the Prince Seigfried's could ever figure out their cue to get to the stage on time for that solo that was inserted for them into ActII. They always seemed to be rushing in late. Also Maxim Belotserkovsky was the only prince that dove off the cliff with grace in the final scene and who didn't look like he was going for a belly whopper in the lake below! Perhaps one of the readers who have seen it this year can let me know if these things have been corrected.

#5 Manhattnik

Manhattnik

    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 17 June 2001 - 01:50 PM

Just think, if MacMillan had choreographed R&J for two Romeos (and why not? Oscar Araiz's had three Juliets for some reason), maybe the one without the sweatpants would've stepped out for the third act...

#6 Manhattnik

Manhattnik

    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 17 June 2001 - 02:02 PM

I thought Kent was quite wonderful in the white acts, and a bit less so in the Black Swan. I'll agree her fouettes looked a bit determined, but she did crank 'em out. I really did love the way she reached down and lovingly caressed Corella's cheek just before flinging herself into that triumphant backbend at the pas de deux's climax. Very telling and very effective gesture.

There's so much of this production I cannot bear, from Swamp-Thing Von R waving around that toy swan that looks like a stuffed goose, to Swamp-Thing's endless, endless death throes. (Does he run up the cliff to peer down and see if Siefried and Odette have hit the water yet?) The fourth act verges on criminal. And, am I going nuts or does he use the Russian Dance music twice? Once for the Benno's girlfriend in Act I and then again for Purple-Boots Von R's "steal-the-princesses" dance in Act III? And why can't Odile exit with Purple-Boots behind the flash powder? Why does she have to run off into some obscure corner of the castle? I can't believe that the extra ten seconds needed for her to exit properly would make or break her Act IV costume change!

I'll second all the comments about the Cornejos, and Reyes. I'd tried to give her the benefit of the doubt and try to believe that some of her overdone cuteness had to do with the roles I'd seen her in. Olga in Onegin isn't exactly the sharpest pencil in the box, and Amor in Don Q bleeds cuteness. Having said that, I still found myself reaching for a flyswatter when watching her Amor coyly wag her finger at Don Q, who was probably wishing he'd remembered to include his lance in his dream. (Anne Milewski's Amor managed to be sweet but not saccharine, which was a nice change for this role.)

#7 vagansmom

vagansmom

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 543 posts

Posted 17 June 2001 - 10:27 PM

I saw Friday night's performance. Thought Herman Cornejo and Malakhov, for the men, were standouts - Cornejo in particular, because I'd never seen him dance before. I wish Malakhov's Rothbart had more dancing; he was quite wonderful.

Kent was lovely throughout. I do agree that her White Swan was more impressive than her Black. She seemed quite tired in the fouettes- they lacked "oomph".

#8 stan

stan

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 47 posts

Posted 18 June 2001 - 09:07 AM

What's the thing that Odette does with her arms just before her exit in Act II when she's boureeing across the stage with her back to the audience? When it's done right (and maybe you have to be double-jointed to do it right), there's a magical sensation of utter fluidity, as if there were no bones in the arms. I missed that in Kent's performance. The Firebird does the same sort of thing just before her exit and I thought Bouder was better.

FWIW, the best I ever saw was Makarova.

#9 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Emeralds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,723 posts

Posted 18 June 2001 - 10:06 AM

manhattnik you naughty fellow! :)

#10 Colleen Boresta

Colleen Boresta

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 351 posts

Posted 18 June 2001 - 07:54 PM

I saw two "Swan Lakes" on June 16th - the matinee and the evening performances. Let me start by saying that I wish Kevin McKenzie would bring back the David Blair production of "Swan Lake". My criticisms of Kevin McKenzie's "Swan Lake" have been repeated many times (both last year and this year), so I'll try to be brief.

First of all, the prologue is so bad it's laughable - especially at the end when Odette turns into the stuffed toy duck or goose or whatever it is. No matter what explantions McKenzie gives, I don't think there's any need for two von Rothbarts. I also find von Rothbart's big number in Act III to be rather jarring. It was very well danced by Marcelo Gomes at the matinee. Vladimir Malakhov's performance in the evening was so superb it almost justified the inclusion of von Rothbart's solo. But I don't think this dance has any dramatic purpose. It's as though McKenzie said to himself "I have a lot of strong male dancers - let me create another part for them."

The biggest weakness of this production of "Swan Lake" is the brevity of Act IV. And as Manhattnik has already mentioned, von Rothbart's death in Act IV was really overdone. (In my opinion, it ranked with the prologue for stupidity and bad taste in ballet.)

At the matinee performance, Julio Bocca was an ardent Prince Siegfried. Both his acting and his dancing were first-rate, but for some reason Bocca changed some of the choreography for the coda of the Black Swan pas de deux. Ashley Tuttle as Odette/Odile was much better than when I saw her dance the part last year. Both times Tuttle was a wonderful Odette who danced with lovely, lyrical phrasing. But last year Tuttle was a weak Odile who fell off pointe after doing about 9 of the famous 32 fouettes. This year she was a wickedly seductive Odile. Her fouettes were not great, but at least she managed to hold on for all 32 of them.

At the afternoon performance, Sean Stewart stood out in the Neopolitan dance in Act III, and Ximora Reyes was excellent in the pas de trois in Act I. I really enjoy Reyes' dancing - it's so light and crisp and clean. As Benno, Joaquin De Luz was very exciting - great leaps, turns, etc. But he really needs to watch his line.

As good as the matinee performance was, it was nothing compared to the evening performance. It may be the best "Swan Lake" I've ever seen (only imagine if the production were better) and I think it probably ranks as one of the five best ballet I've ever seen (in 21 years of attending ballet.)

The reasons it was so great were the performances of Dvorovenko and Belotserkovsky. I can't decide whether she was a better Odette or Odile - she was so wonderful in both parts. In fact it seemed to me that Dvorovenko became those parts - she fully inhabited both roles. And talk about great boneless arms (is there a ballet term to describe that?) I think they are even better than Nina A's. It really made the end of Act II both exciting and poignant. Those arms showed that von Rothbart had won, and no matter how much Odile loved Siegfried, she was forced to become a swan again. And in the Black Swan pas de deux, Dvorovenko was just perfect. Her fouettes were great - fast and right on target. I don't know whether she did doubles or triples. I hate to admit this, but I have no idea how to tell the difference between singles, doubles, and triples, especially when the fouettes are so fast and furious. But to me Dvorovenko's performance was not about technique - it was about using the technique to become the part. The fouettes are an important part of Odile's (and von Rohtbart's) plan to entrap Siegfried so that Odette remains a swan forever.

And Belotserkovsky was also superb, both in his acting and his dancing. I'm ashamed to admit it, but I never put him in the ranks of Corella, or Bocca or Stiefel as far as exciting male dancers go. But Belotserkovsky really does possess a powerful technique as well as a wonderful line, and he used that technique to enhance his performance. And as good as their individual performances were, together Dvorovenko and Belotserkovsky were so much better. Their performances just dripped with passion.

I already mentioned how impressed I was (as always) with the performance of Vladimir Malakhov as von Rothbart in Act III. Sean Stewart again was excellent in the Neopolitan dance, but this time his partner was Hernan Cornejo who was even better than Stewart. What an exciting dancer Cornejo - so clear and crisp and precise. Michele Wiles was very good in the first act pas de trois. Marcelo Gomes as Benno was first-rate. He's a very elegant dancer with a superb leap.

So as I think was mentioned last year, if the performances are outstanding, ABT's production of "Swan Lake" comes together. And I'll never be able to see a production of "Swan Lake" again without comparing the performances to those of Dvorovenko and her husband.

#11 felursus

felursus

    Bronze Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts

Posted 18 June 2001 - 11:25 PM

I'm going to throw out a question here: what OTHER productions of Swan Lake (aside from the one under discussion and the Royal Ballet's late 60s Carl Toms-designed production - and soon lost from that presumably for reasons of timing) have had a prologue wherein one sees the transformation of Princess Odette into a swan? :)

#12 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,246 posts

Posted 19 June 2001 - 01:17 AM

Flemming Flindt's in 1966 in Copenhagen, I think, and I think there were others around that time. When you start messing around with it, you all of a sudden realize that the audience can't figure out what's going on, and so add a prologue to a) explain everything or B) really confuse everybody. That's my theory, anyway.

Thanks Drew, Mahnattnik and Colleen for such nice long reviews. I think we'll do "Swan Lake" as the next Ballets in Detail. Threads up tomorrow.

#13 Sonora

Sonora

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 110 posts

Posted 19 June 2001 - 03:15 AM

I haven't had the pleasure of seeing this Swan Lake and so greatly appreciate the vividly descriptive reviews.

Comments about the 'endless death throes' of Rothbart reminded me of what I consider two of the most uncomfortable passages in ballet - the interminable deaths of first Mercutio, then Tybalt, in Romeo and Juliet. Their lengths dictated by the score, I realize. Nevertheless I am always thrown off by the histrionics. They would seem even more disturbing within the context of Swan Lake's (Tchaikovsky's) purity and Classicism.

#14 Manhattnik

Manhattnik

    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 19 June 2001 - 04:29 AM

Colleen, I missed Tuttle's Swan Lake, but I wouldn't have missed Dvorovenko and Belotserkovsky for the world.

I'd expected these two to be great in Swan Lake, and I wasn't disappointed. I've been struck this season with Beloterskovsky's poise and confidence. It wasn't long ago he'd be pushing, pushing, pushing to make every leap, step, turn as big, clean and perfect as possible. Now he just dances, and I love his elegant style -- he's a perfect Prince. He really made some sense of those endless "yearning-in-arabesque" solos for Siegfried. Funny how a promotion to principal dancer can work wonders for one's confidence.

As for Dvorovenko, she's much better suited for Odette than Giselle. She dances grandly. Everything's writ large -- she knows she's got magnificent long limbs and extension, and she's not afraid to use them to the hilt for both technical and dramatic bravura. I've always found Dvorovenko's acting to be adequate, but her emoting to be first-rate, and she's at her best when she can give free rein to her instinct for the dramatic, if not melodramatic. Her Odette doesn't simply suffer and love, she Suffers and Loves, and if Dvorovenko paints with a broad brush indeed, her strokes were nonetheless telling, and never more than in her dancing: dramatic plunges into penchees, heart-wrenching poses in those beautiful and tortured upward-swept attitudes, and always the sweep of her magnificently flexible back. I was enthralled with the sheer grandeur and amplitude of her dancing, but also noted that she stopped just short of the sort of grotesquely overdone "calves-to-the-ears" extensions that we see too much of these days. Dvorovenko is not incapable of subtlety -- she's just very judicious in its use. (These qualities made her Tatiana in Onegin quite wonderful and over-the-top, and her Kitri is almost too much fun for words.)

Her Odile is similarly over-the-top. She just drips with power, hunger and pure sexual aggression. She was the Bad Girl our mothers all warned us about (or should've), and she loved every second of it. I'll never forget how she swept into the throne room on Malakhov's arm and as he promenaded her past Belotserkovsky, shot him a quick, assessive glance like a cat sizing up a platter of fresh tuna. This Siegfried was doomed from the instant this Odile set foot onstage, and, it seemed, everyone in the audience knew it. I don't think I've ever before heard chuckling from the audience at the plight of hapless Siegfried, yet in this context it seemed perfectly appropriate.

To mix metaphors and venues, Dvorovenko's a slugger. She swings for the cheap seats, and usually connects. My only disappointments with her Odile were that she didn't hold that balance in arabesque near the end of the adagio for more than a split second (I felt her similarly shaky balances in the Don Q pas de deux were also a bit of a letdown), and she didn't embellish her fouettes -- No doubles or triples or tricks, but they were fast, dead on the music and she barely drifted at all.

As for the rest, well, this is a Swan Lake that makes me yearn for a Jester. How I wish they'd go back to the David Blair, but that's not to be.....

Anyway, in the pas de trois, Cornejo was again wonderful, although his landing from his double tours weren't as clean as is his wont. Anne Milewski was a game substitute for Stella Abrera (I think), but she flagged a bit in her solo and coda. I haven't said much about Michele Wiles' dancing this season, but she seems much more relaxed and happy, and more connected to what's going on around her. Throughout her solo she made it clear she was dancing for Siefried, to try to lighten him up a bit, not just to have fun with Benno.

As always, Ekatrina Shelkanova was a delight in the Czardas.

#15 Autumn7

Autumn7

    Member

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • 32 posts

Posted 19 June 2001 - 09:24 AM

I think the Stanislavsky Ballet brought a Swan Lake to Washington a few years ago with a prologue but I didn't get to see it first hand. Maybe one of our members recalls it. To continue with Mahattnik's baseball metaphors, I love the rhubarb that ensues each time either Martin's or McKenzie's Swan Lake is mentioned. But even though ballet & baseball are different venues a 4-6-3 double play turned at second base sometimes has the poetry of dance to it. (Sorry, I couldn't help myself. The Washington Post's lead story was the reitrement of Cal Ripken after this season)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):