POB 2004-2005 season
Posted 05 March 2004 - 01:51 AM
The rumors I've heard so far (many modern works, increased prices...) don't make me feel optimistic. Well, let's hope it's not true!
Posted 08 March 2004 - 02:24 PM
So here is the 2004-2005 season:
-a triple bill: Jérôme Bel (new work)- Harald Lander (Etudes)- Jerome Robbins (Glass pieces) in September.
The first performance will also include the défile and Balanchine's Sonatine (and, as it has become usual in the last few fews, will probably be overpriced )
-A Preljocaj double bill (with MC 14/22 and a new work)
-a triple bill: Trisha Brown (Glacial decoy and a new work)- William Forsythe (Pas/ parts), Francine Lancelot (Bach suite)
-Nureyev's production of The Sleeping Beauty
-Kader Belarbi's Hurlevent
-Nureyev's production of Cinderella
-a triple bill: Suzanne Linke (Les familiers du labyrinthe)- Michèle Noiret (new work)- Laura Scozzi (The seven deadly sins, premiered a few seasons ago during a homage to Kochno)
-John Neumeier's Sylvia
-Pina Bausch's Orphée et Eurydice
-Nureyev's production of Romeo and Juliet
-a Roland Petit triple bill with Carmen, Le jeune homme et la mort and L'Arlésienne
And that's all for the company. As you can see, there's a sad lack of classical works: only three big productions by Nureyev, and (in the neoclassical field) only Etudes, Glass pieces, Neumeier's Sylvia (which I don't find very interesting- and which was performed for a half-empty theater last season) and the Petit works. All the new works in the repertory are modern works.
There's a definite slant towards modern works. I don't know if it has anything to do with the arrival of Gerard Mortier as the successor of Hugues Gall... But that season sounds indeed like one of the Théâtre de la Ville, not one of the Paris Opera Ballet! And much of the repertory of the company is completely ignored: no Lifar (who was born in 1905),
no Balanchine, Tudor, no Ashton, no Fokine...
Also the two guest companies of the season will be modern: the Merce Cunningham Dance Company, and Alain Platel's company.
The school program will include a new work by José Martinez, Balanchine's Le Tombeau de Couperin (the only Balanchine work of the season <sigh>) and Aveline's Les deux pigeons.
Well, I guess I'll save some money on ballet tickets next season.
Posted 08 March 2004 - 02:28 PM
Posted 09 March 2004 - 04:21 AM
It's a new work of Suzanne Linka that we will have in this evening consacred to women choreograph.
A very sad season too contemporary, no neo-classical and always the same ballets in classical :angry:
Posted 09 March 2004 - 06:05 AM
Yes, it's a really sad season And I really wonder if they'll find enough people to fill the theater to see such programs...
Posted 09 March 2004 - 01:39 PM
Posted 10 March 2004 - 03:28 PM
....well I share your grief. Too few classical works, total absence of ballets blanc and Balanchine (nearly!) has made me speechless - surely the choice of repertoire is not dependent on financial reasons? (I've been led to believe POB is the wealthiest ballet company in Europe.....)
Posted 10 March 2004 - 03:44 PM
Posted 11 March 2004 - 02:13 AM
There are already so many theatres here in Paris where people can see modern dance, but there was only one where we could still see classical works. Besides, if some dancers are well-at-ease in modern dance, most of all are only well-trained classical dancers and will not dance a lot next season.
People are very lucky in London and in the US!
Posted 11 March 2004 - 05:03 PM
Juliette, on Mar 11 2004, 12:13 PM, said:
Naoko, yes the Paris Opera is very rich, however I think that in general more money goes to opera productions than to ballet productions. But I have no idea of what costs more... And there will be a lot of new works in the next season which usually costs quite a lot (new sets, new costumes, sometimes new music). A large majority of the modern dance works created by the Paris Opera Ballet during the last decade (e.g. Lionel Hoche's Yamm, Jean-Claude Gallotta's Nosferatu, Odile Duboc's Rhapsody in blue, Darde's Orison...) were not performed after their first season and are unlikely to be performed again- so even it they were less expensive than classical productions, that's not a wise investment...
Also what is saddening is that there really is some audience who wants to see more classics (for example, Lacotte's "Paquita" was received with much enthusiasm by the audience, the Bolchoi's performances were sold out, etc.) but the direction seems to pay very little attention to that, and seems to think now that the POB's role is to dance about any kind of dance.
Posted 11 March 2004 - 05:31 PM
Posted 12 March 2004 - 01:20 AM
Posted 12 March 2004 - 07:42 AM
Also, as it is heavily subsidized, the POB can afford to ignore public opinion more than most companies. French posters, are there ever discussions of reducing its subsidy?
Posted 12 March 2004 - 09:31 AM
Posted 12 March 2004 - 09:45 AM
Alexandra, on Mar 12 2004, 01:31 AM, said:
I suspect that would encourage the guys in charge to do more Bausch.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: