Art The Day After
Posted 21 September 2001 - 01:55 PM
Do you generally agree, generally disagree? Do you react differently this week to TV and movie previews -- and ballet company marketing, which has stressed aggression, if not the special effects violence of movies. (On the other hand, if we're going to be in a militaristic period, we may be seeing a lot of aggressive art.)
Anyway, here's the letter, from a gentleman in Atlanta:
"For many years, a debate has taken place in this country as to whether the violence portrayed in movies has had a negative effect on society. I always felt that any such effect was minimal and that it is the responsibility of individuals to decide for themselves what they wish to view. I found films such as "Die Hard," "Deep Impact" and "Independence Day" a welcome diversion from the routine of reality.
"Now I can never look upon these types of movies the same way. If I do, I will not be thinking about the impressive special effects. Instead, I will be thinking of the thousands of lives lost on Sept. 11. I will not be marveling at the realistic sound effects. Instead, I will be thinking about the many children who lost their mothers and fathers on that horrible day.
"The portrayal of an exploding building, a hijacked airplane or a chaotic aftermath will never again be entertaining, no matter how good the special effects may be. For these types of films are no longer diversions from reality. Rather, they have become reality, and I'm not going to pay money to see that."
Posted 21 September 2001 - 04:49 PM
My reaction to TV/movies is that nearly every subject portrayed seems so insignificant. I'm in a gentle mood, that is I want everything to be gentle so that my shattered existance can try to recover. Most ballet is gentle; "Car Man" isn't.
[ 09-21-2001: Message edited by: Giannina Mooney ]
Posted 21 September 2001 - 07:27 PM
As for right now, I've hit the point of wanting nothing but gentility. That awful first day, when I wasn't sure if my son was alive (he was in the subway under the first tower at the time of the attack), I couldn't watch or listen to the news because of my great fear. For four hours of waiting to hear from him, I played a Fonteyn/Nureyev video over and over again to keep my sanity.
I'm finding that everything is more beautiful now- the sunshine, trees, the smell of the air, classical music I'm playing all day long...I realize that I'm trying to cloak myself in as much beauty as I can for as long as possible.
[ 09-21-2001: Message edited by: vagansmom ]
Posted 21 September 2001 - 11:45 PM
Now we are about to bomb Afghanistan from the dark ages (which they are already in) to the stone age. The TV will show lots of images of planes, bombings, colorful tracers - as they did during the Gulf War. It will look just like the violence we see in movies and on TV. Kids, who don't remember the Gulf War, will think it very exciting. It won't seem "real" until they start bringing back the bodies in bags. Even then, I'm not sure the kids will be able to distinguish the reality of so many dead (on both sides) and the unreality of a movie.
There are movie directors who want to impress upon us the violence of war and the problem of the modern-day John Wayne "ride in and hit 'em hard" syndrome, who know they are attempting to shock us with an ever-increasing cycle of violence. But as we have become innured to yet another multi-vehicle crash/fireball, another shoot-out with assault weapons that leaves countless dead and lots of body parts strewing the ground, another scene that graphically portrays throat-slitting, body mutilation, etc., they have to find more and more extreme ways to shock us. I think Americans are so used to being "shocked" by celluloid portrayals, that we are completely desensitized to the real thing.
i don't mean to imply that people aren't horrified and shocked by the WTC disaster. Here in NYC everyone either knows someone who died or knows someone who knew people who died. The hardest part is that there aren't many bodies - and I doubt that there will be. The fireballs caused by the jet fuel will probably have incinerated most of those still missing. But we still crave "action." Just wait a year: there will doubtless be both a movie and a "made for TV special" - or two - on the subject. They will make sure everyone sees the bodies jumping and falling from the Towers - as those of us who saw the events live or the initial, live broadcasts did. They will make sure to show firemen getting hit by the piles of debris. We will see the priest (sorry, I can't remember his name) who stopped to give last rites to a fallen rescue worker also being overcome. There will be lots of blood and severed body parts. We will see much-bloodied heros rescuing or attempting to rescue people. We are going to need all that blood and gore to keep our desire for revenge alive once the bodies start coming home.
Posted 22 September 2001 - 09:34 AM
On September 11th, there was no James Bond, Harrison Ford, Jean Claude Van Dam, Arnold Schwartzenegger or Jackie Chan to save the day. No Superman to fly in front of the airliner about to strike and strenuously to push it back in reverse, before setting it down and capturing the terrorists.
In retrospect, it is the happy endings, not the doomsday scenarios, that are unrealistic about action films.
Another eerie parallel is Super Nintendo, where the "player" draws a bulls eye on a building (or something) and, when hit, the "something" soundlessly crumbles to the ground in flames and smoke. I won't be able to watch people playing those games any more without anguish.
Posted 22 September 2001 - 12:20 PM
Posted 22 September 2001 - 04:23 PM
Unfortunately, before then there will have been at least 1,000 tacky, melodramatic pieces of shlock.
Posted 22 September 2001 - 08:47 PM
Posted 24 September 2001 - 08:47 AM
Posted 24 September 2001 - 11:48 AM
Posted 24 September 2001 - 01:24 PM
The-violence-in-entertainment debate is not one that I'm going to wade into here. I will say that, of the movies mentioned in the letter to the Post, I quite liked the first "Die Hard" and enjoyed watching Will Smith punch out extraterrestials in "Independence Day." It's true that lots of things explode in these movies, but their cartoonishness seems fairly harmless to me, unlike some "serious" movies I can think of.
Posted 26 September 2001 - 09:33 AM
I doubt very likely we will see much in the way of actual destruction when the US retaliates (as they should swiftly and in massive force).
Since this next war will be fought in fits and strikes (and covert/stealth- as it should be), likely all we will see are the after effects (though I sure it will be played out with pictures of bombed out baby milk factories, civilains killed (and whether or not the media (CNN) plays that as anti/ugly-American, and I predict they will).
As this relates to violent movies, it must be that I am getting older for these movies don't appeal to me any longer (they haven't for years). This recent murderous attack (I refuse to call this event a tradgedy; it was cold blooded murder of innocents), though disbelieving I will admit, will not effect the way I view violent movies (of those I may watch. I know the difference between fact and fiction. Fact has far more impact.
No happy endings, Micheal1? No heros to save the day?
How about the deaths Hitler (self inflicted suicide; sure to face death by hanging by the allies),Yamamoto (assasinated by US Navy fighters)and Mussilini (assasinated by mobs of very angry Italians).They all died at the hands of heros (heros to some degree though certainly not Gary Cooper).
These evil people will get theirs in the end. I have absolute faith in that.
Posted 26 September 2001 - 02:05 PM
Please don't take this personally, anyone.
Posted 26 September 2001 - 02:18 PM
Posted 26 September 2001 - 03:46 PM
The images I always find the worst are actually found on the news. In the U.S. sensational journalism is extreme.
One image from the Sept 11 day is the footage of people in the streets of foreign lands celebrating. I found that harder to watch than what I saw from my window.
What was done was in some ways "political" and I hope that there aren't any ballets done on it.
In 50 years from now (if they can wait that long) this will be a movie but until then we'll have our tv's to watch.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):