What's Wrong With Being a "Flagship Soloist" or "Junio
Posted 15 June 2012 - 09:33 AM
McKenzie seems to suggest that there is nothing wrong with being a "flagship soloist" or a "junior principal" at ABT.
I think a lot of people would take a different view. Stella Abrera, just to name one person, has been performing principal roles for years at ABT, but she does not receive the pay of a principal. Nor does she receive the status of being a principal, although she is doing principal work. In spite of the foregoing, she no longer seems to be on a principal track at ABT, and it seems less and less likely that she will be promoted.
I thought this would be an interesting topic for discussion.
Posted 15 June 2012 - 10:00 AM
Posted 15 June 2012 - 11:25 AM
Posted 16 June 2012 - 02:00 AM
I think that McKenzie's first sentences was quite telling: "It soon became pretty evident that every good artistic decision is a lousy business decision. And vice versa."
I think that can apply to personal-relation decisions within a company, too. -sigh-
Does anyone know how it works - pay-wise - in ABT and other US-American companies? Where I am, usually if one does not have "solo" in your contract, then anytime one does solo work, one gets a bit of extra pay; and if one does principal work (as "just a soloist") one often gets even more extra. (though of course it does depend on the individual workings of the contract)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):