Jump to content


How far can a choreographer go in expressing ideas?


  • Please log in to reply
158 replies to this topic

#151 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,117 posts

Posted 07 December 2009 - 10:17 AM

The thing I have to stress again is that the broadcast destination for this programming was BBC4, not a public channel, a very very specialised niche cable channel with an average viewing audience of about 6 people if they're lucky. And in truth if it IS post watershed why can't specialised programming still take place in appropriate formats, channels and times. Because the BBC was broadcasting pre watershed they pulled the De Frutos - a pity about the time slot, the De Frutos was the most interesting thing on the quadruple bill.


Thank you, Simon, that's worth repeating.

Like most people posting to this thread, I haven't seen the de Frutos but don't have any problem with daring or potentially offensive material shown on appropriate channels at appropriate times. If parents aren't minding the kiddies' bedtimes there's only so much broadcasters can be expected to do about that.

I couldn't find it again, but cubanmiamiboy's comment about art works and video game content is a good one.

#152 cubanmiamiboy

cubanmiamiboy

    Diamonds Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,239 posts

Posted 07 December 2009 - 10:34 AM

I couldn't find it again, but cubanmiamiboy's comment about art works and video game content is a good one.


Here is goes again... :angel_not:

My two cents to this thread. My mother is an Arts teacher-(college level in Cuba, elementary school here). She's prohibited to show her students images of Laoco÷n and his sons, Venus de Milo, Michelangelo's David, Goya's Naked Maja and so on. Meanwhile video games depicting rape, murdering and plain sauvage behaviors are legally allowed. What's wrong with this picture...?



#153 Mashinka

Mashinka

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,177 posts

Posted 18 December 2009 - 06:52 AM

Comment on the BBC's decision from Sadlers Wells CE, Alistair Spalding which also gives him the opportunity to plug performances by Marie Chouinard at his theatre next May.

http://www.guardian....an-be-dangerous

#154 Simon G

Simon G

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 564 posts

Posted 18 December 2009 - 05:19 PM

Here's De Frutos in The Guardian on the pulling of the work:

http://www.guardian....avier-de-frutos


In it he acknowledges that it was only appropriate for post watershed, and as I suspected, when commissioned the BBC thought because it's dance (or ballet, it seems they thought, showing a depressing lack of knowledge of wider dance forms) they assumed it would be anodyne, & safe for all the family, so always thought it would be pre watershed and scheduled it as such.

Regarding the question of pious, appropriate Television viewing fayre for Christmas, and the need to safeguard the moral landscape of society by completely censoring all broadcasts pre and post watershed. I'd just like to point to the fact that part of the Xmas programming for terrestrial television on Channel 5 in the UK, and thus publicallly accessible to everyone of the 60 million residents of the UK is the Exorcist. The full version with nothing cut out.

#155 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,117 posts

Posted 20 December 2009 - 03:35 PM

Nothing says wholesome holiday fun like a little girl shoving a crucifix up her crotch. Although I'm not sure that wouldn't be better for the children than a viewing of Love Actually.

#156 Simon G

Simon G

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 564 posts

Posted 20 December 2009 - 05:32 PM

Nothing says wholesome holiday fun like a little girl shoving a crucifix up her crotch. Although I'm not sure that wouldn't be better for the children than a viewing of Love Actually.



Snuff would be preferable to Love Actually.

#157 Helene

Helene

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,150 posts

Posted 20 December 2009 - 06:14 PM

Nothing says wholesome holiday fun like a little girl shoving a crucifix up her crotch. Although I'm not sure that wouldn't be better for the children than a viewing of Love Actually.



Snuff would be preferable to Love Actually.

But it has Alan Rickman in it. Surely there's something worse than Love Actually...

#158 innopac

innopac

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 783 posts

Posted 23 April 2010 - 01:26 AM

Here is a quote about the censorship attempts during Diaghilev's visit to America in 1916. (From Judith Mackrell's biography of Lydia Lopokova.)

On 25 January a legal injunction was passed against both Scheherazade and Faune, requiring Diaghilev to lighten the Slave's make-up and restrict the Faun's climax to a mute expression of longing. But even with these changes, censorship continued to plague the company throughout their tour. In Boston the mayor gave instructions that the Russians were permitted to bare only their toes; and in Kansas City, Captain Ennis of the Police Department gave stern notice that no lewdness was permitted on his watch. As he reported proudly to the Kansas City Star, 'Dogleaf, or whatever his name is couldn't understand plain English [so] . . . I told a fellow [the interpreter] "This is a strictly moral town and we won't stand for any high brow immorality. Put on your show but keep it toned down." I told him we didn't want to make trouble but if the show was too rank I'd come right up on stage and call down the curtain.'



#159 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,117 posts

Posted 23 April 2010 - 02:27 AM

Nice quote, innopac. Interesting, if unsurprising, that the Americans became at least as agitated over race as sex.


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):