RB's La Fille Mal Gardee
Posted 01 February 2001 - 07:42 PM
Making a welcome, return to Covent Garden (there were performances at the Royal Festival Hall during the closure period), this has to be Frederick Ashton's greatest gift to the Royal BAllet. Ashton left some wonderful ballets but rarely has choreography/scenario/music/design combined to such effect. The Nutcracker is the traditional Christmas, children's ballet but to my mind this is much more suited to non-ballet fans. It is marvellous to see it back in the repertoire with a new generation of dancers - I hope the incoming administration don't see it as a relic to be set aside in their rush join the adoration of NAcho Duarto (actually I love Duarto, too, I just want to see some Ashton too!)
Fille was probably old-fashioned whne it was first made in 1960. Osbert Lancaster's cartoon designs evoke a sunny, benign landscape in which the worst thing that can happen to a girl is not being allowed out to see her boyfriend and a happy ending is a certainty (not that many of those in ballet!) John Lanchbery returns to conduct the fizzy, lilting score he constructed from Herold and his own compositions - incidentally he got a tremendous ovation at 26/1/01 performance from what was obviously a fairly knowledgable audience.
I don't know if many overseas companies perform Fille - maybe it's too ENGLISH a ballet - but the choreography is both beautiful and witty, from the ribbon pas de deux to the clog dance and Lise's "marriage" mime.
Four casts are scheduled to dance this season but already Johan Kobborg has had to drop out - I was SO looking forward to that as I'm sure it would have been a perfect marriage of dancer and role. Miyako Yoshida (whose acting has improved tremendously since she began dancing regularly with Mukhamedov) and Mukhamedov were the first cast. She was terrific and Mukhamedov showed he'd still a great artist - OK, a bit hammy but still a fabulous dancer and a showman (I like a dancer who relates to the audience and looks like he's enjoyed it too!)
Sarah Wildor (the best Lise in 1998) is scheduled to dance with Ethan Stiefel (is he fit???!! I hope so) and Belinda Hatley will dance with Joahn persson, newly arrived from Canada. he's already danced with Jane Burn in place of Kobborg which sort of shows the lack of male dancers at the RB at the moment. Is there no one else - couldn't Burley give it a go, or Alvarez? I wish Carlos Acosta was scheduled for this run (I'll have to wait for his Oberon in May - should be amazing!)
I bought the video of an eighties performance of Fille with Lesley Collier which is just enchanting too, though a couple of the performances are a bit bland. Alexander Grant - the original Alain, Lise's unwanted suitor - has been coaching the current casts which may have accounted for the improved characterisation.
Ashton isn't supposed to "sell" well but Fille is practically sold out, the Ashton Revisited bill last MArch was the hottest ticket of the season and the Quintuple Bill including Symohonic Variations and Monotones last autumn was also very popular.
I'd be interested to know how much Ashton is performed by other companies and of so, is it very popular?
Posted 01 February 2001 - 08:55 PM
But it didn't do well at the box office at all. Partly it was a result of the timing; Pacific Northwest Ballet only gave 4 performances of Balanchine's "A Midsummer Night's Dream" the week before to sold-out audiences. As for the actual performance of La Fille that I saw, it however left a lot to be desired. I hope to see this ballet again when it receives further performances in Hong Kong next month.
[This message has been edited by Kevin Ng (edited February 02, 2001).]
Posted 01 February 2001 - 11:25 PM
Maki Asami Ballet has La Fille and the Birthday Offerings (Ifve only seen the former and it was nice); Kobayashi Noriko Theater has Les Patineurs as one of its strongest pieces; and The New National Theater Ballet in Tokyo will revive Ashtonfs Cinderella in February, and itfll come back again in December (the fact proves how much the ballet welcomed in its premier in e99.)
I believe Ashtonfs ballets are suited for Japanese, both dancers and audiences. His choreography fits well to their compact bodies and accurate techniques particular to Japanese dancers. And his neo-classical style match to tastes of Japanese audiences. I hope to see Ashtonfs work much more in Japan!
Posted 02 February 2001 - 02:47 AM
Since we don't get "La Fille" here, I have to get back to London in Feb!! This time I am going to take my mum there, and I am looking forward to a great time at ROH!
Posted 03 February 2001 - 10:04 PM
Posted 03 February 2001 - 10:50 PM
Having danced in all except Monotones, I can report that Ashton ballets, though not easy, are a lot of fun to dance. For The Joffrey Ballet, Stanley Holden reprised his role of Widow Simone, for most performances and I really enjoyed flying with my red umbrella.
Posted 04 February 2001 - 11:31 AM
Posted 06 February 2001 - 08:04 PM
Glebb, your comments on dancing Ashton (and being Alain!) were interesting. Incidentally, did you find Ashton particularly hard to dance? Last year I went to a talk by Johan Kobborg who described how hard he found Symphonic Variations (his first Ashton I think), yet when he watched others dancing it from the winds all he could think of was "Why is it so difficult?" As a non dancer - merely and entralled spectator - I'd be interested to know whether Ashton's deceptibvely simple steps are as hard/harder/easier than other choroegraphers.
Posted 06 February 2001 - 10:51 PM
I know that I had great admiration for his ballets after seeing THE DREAM at age 17. My love for that ballet made me strive to work hard and aquire the level of technique needed for Ashton ballets.
I loved dancing Puck, Boy in Blue and Alain the most.
Posted 14 February 2001 - 02:57 AM
Posted 14 February 2001 - 11:31 AM
The standard Russo-Soviet FILLE (a.k.a. VAIN PRECAUTIONS) is by Leonid Lavrovsky, from his 1937 Leningrad Maly Theater production. Lavrovsky maintained the best of the Imperial Era FILLES (1885 Petipa/Ivanov and 1901 Gorsky) & made it more theatrical. Too, Lavrovsky utilized the Hertel score (the Imperial Russian era music), rather than that by Herold, which Ashton used.
The Russo-Soviet/Lavrovsky FILLE is significantly longer than Ashton's. It includes a complete "Wedding Celebrations Act" (Act III) after the "discovery scene" in Simone/Lise's house. Act III is a Petipaesque Wedding Divertissement in a garden, complete with unlikely 'national dances' from far-off lands, such as a troupe of gypsies. The ballet ends with the Grand Pas de Deux for Lise and Colin. [This is the virtuoso pdd that is often danced in ballet competitions & which Baryshnikov revived for ABT in the early 1980s. ]
All of the comic touches that I heretofore thought of as "pure Ashton" are in the Lavrovsky; for example, Lise/Colin's Act I Ribbon Dance making a cat's cradle or the 'promenade' of characters before the front-curtain on their way to the harvest or Alain's dopey flirting with his beloved umbrella throughout the ballet and at the very end.
Ashton's main innovations are:
- dancing chickens (I love them!)
- Simone danced en travestie (as are Ashton's Ugly Stepsisters in CINDERELLA)
- Simone's hilarious Clog Dance
- Alain's "flight" at the end of Act I (the storm)
In sum, seeing the Russo-Soviet version of FILLE/VAIN PRECAUTIONS has shed *very interesting* light on the Ashton version. Both versions delightful...Ashton's tighter and more comic...the Russians a bit 'grander' but also very funny! - Jeannie
Posted 14 February 2001 - 12:19 PM
ABT did an "after Petipa" version of "Fille" which the Washington Ballet mounted a few years ago. I'm sure it was much more compact than the original.
Posted 14 February 2001 - 12:51 PM
The 1970s ABT version was indeed compact & did not resemble the Petipa/Lavrovsky/et. al.very much, except in basic plot. If memory serves, ABT's edition was by Bronislava Nijinska & utilized the Hertel ("Russian") score. The "Petipa et. al." is longer than even the Ashton. You should try to see it some day!
Posted 17 February 2001 - 10:24 AM
I've never seen any evidence that Ashton had seen the Lavrovsky version - I would think that their similarities arise not because Ashton saw Lavrovsky's but because both are derived from the same sources - Dauberval's original, and later additions which were known to both via different channels.
[This message has been edited by Jane Simpson (edited February 17, 2001).]
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users