Peter Boal in Red Angels
#1
Posted 22 August 2010 - 02:41 PM
P.S. I can never see Red Angels without thinking of Leslie Rausch. No one else ever quite measures up to her in that female role for me.
#2
Posted 23 August 2010 - 09:05 AM
#3
Posted 23 August 2010 - 09:15 AM
#4
Posted 23 August 2010 - 10:16 AM
#5
Posted 24 August 2010 - 02:26 PM
#6
Posted 24 August 2010 - 02:46 PM
#7
Posted 24 August 2010 - 05:23 PM
Anna Kisselgoff of the NY Times said some interesting things about Dove in 1996:
Quote
Quote
Kisselgoff was reviewing a memorial tribute to Dove, one week after his death, in which a number of his works were danced by several companies, including 2 by NYCB. I have the feeling that I might understand and appreciate Red Angels more if I could see it in the context of some of his other pieces.
http://www.nytimes.c.....ngels"&st=cse
#8
Posted 24 August 2010 - 09:34 PM
The solos are at the end of the ballet. There are other solos and pas de deux before the solos.
#9
Posted 25 August 2010 - 03:57 AM
Helene, on 24 August 2010 - 09:34 PM, said:
#10
Posted 25 August 2010 - 05:28 AM
#11
Posted 25 August 2010 - 02:29 PM
bart said:
Like Peter Boal, I am a big fan of Dove. Like Helene, I truly love Red Angels. For me, it has the excitement of a modern ballet, but with the precise positions, foot work, and arm use of classical ballet. It is a good vehicle for showing off highly skilled classical ballet dancers (in something different) -- in a strange way it reminds me of Agon (austere) with completely different tempi. Unlike Helene, I also love Vespers. She and I have discussed this often, and we both don't seem to see what it is that the other likes/dislikes. For me, there is an power that comes from each dancer in solo that expresses some unsaid passion or pain that transcends. It more suited to a modern dance troupe perhaps, but I thought our always versatile PNB women did it justice (even if they later complained of bruises and other negative impacts on their bodies due to all the floor work). I'm probably in a minority on this, but my favorite of all was Serious Pleasures. I'll make no comment on it as "ballet", but as a stunning piece of dance and drama, it blew me out of my seat. If you like the "sexual expression" side of dance, and I do, this is a blockbuster. The heartache of the death of a gay friend that apparently inspired this work was as powerful as anything I have seen in dance.....especially when Lucien Postlewaite is doing the "narrator" role.
#12
Posted 25 August 2010 - 04:52 PM
-- Boal's line and balance are beautiful. Of all the dancers, he alone maintains a center of calm. I wish I had been able to see more of him during his career at NYCB.
-- The speed and non-stop momentum work well with the sharply edged classical positions. Everything is very, very clear. This is definitely a ballet I would like to see in multiple performances, preferably with dancers I know well, which would add a human touch.
-- I'm sure I've seen one Dove's devices in more than a few other contemporary works. I mean, the way the dancers stride on, do their thing, and then make way for the next dancer, with no apparent connection or relationship to each other, and no noticeable l development from one part to the next. You have the feeling that you could rearrange the order of the four variations without really changing the viewer's experience.
-- I enjoy the music, though I don't know at what point it might start driving me up the wall. Not before the ballet's 12 minutes are up, one would hope.
#13
Posted 25 August 2010 - 05:44 PM
Quote
Quote
*I understand that only this violinist is allowed to play the piece. She goes to where ever it is done.
#14
Posted 25 August 2010 - 05:59 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases:



