Balanchine outside of New York
Posted 30 January 2001 - 05:32 PM
Pro or con, what do you think of Balanchine? How much of his work do you see where you live? Would you like to see more, less? How do you think he has affected ballet -- in his lifetime, but also as a continuing influence? Too much? Too little? Just right?
Posted 30 January 2001 - 11:04 PM
I've seen the 4 T's live (Ballet West) and will be seeing "Who Cares?" in February, "A Midsummer Night's Dream" and "Theme and Variations" later in the Spring. Although I complain a lot about the lack of classical ballet in Utah, I suppose I should at least be happy that Ballet West consistantly includes Balanchine in their rep.
I would LOVE to see them do Apollo, Symphony in C and Jewels!!
I can't really give an in-depth answer as to WHY his ballets appeal to me - they just do! I think for me, it's just all that BEAUTIFUL music and the splendid way he used the choreography to make the music "come alive".
Posted 30 January 2001 - 11:35 PM
Where I live, in Boston, we get Balanchine’s ballet’s pretty frequently, from the Boston Ballet and from the Massachusetts Youth Ballet, which is a “Balanchine” school. I would like to see more, here, because it isn’t always that easy (or cheap) to get down to NY. I’m hoping the level of Balanchine work and the frequency of Balanchine ballets given at Boston Ballet will at least be maintained by Boston Ballet’s new AO.
The works of Balanchine I love (particularly Apollo, 4 Temperaments, Serenade – seen only once) so closely track the essence of their music (also great) that they seem simply a corporalization of feeling – music made into flesh. Watching these ballets (when done well) is a complete esthetic experience. No ballets have words, but Balanchine touches something pre-verbal and fundamental (not simply non-verbal) and yet we are seeing that “something” from the vantage of a full life’s experience. The ballets represent to me the highest ideals of human action and human connection.
On one of the other fora, someone expressed the view that Balanchine personally had become essentially corrupted by his position at NYC Ballet. The responses to his views were mostly apologies of one kind or another and that was a little disappointing. I’ve read many stories about Balanchine’s negative influence on his dancer’s health, physical and mental. In Toni Bentley’s otherwise quite knowing book, written during Balanchine’s time at NYC, she expressed her preference for the excesses of the anorexic “girls” who “burned” from within somehow, preferred those excesses to the excesses of the girls who plumped up on chocolates. Her thinking on these matters was skewed (to put it mildly) and she didn’t even guess it. This kind of thing lends credence to Balanchine’s critics.
I don’t, however, see anything in Balanchine’s choreography that is linked to these excesses. It’s the choreography that must be the model and inspiration – not the physical appearance of his favorite dancers.
That doesn’t mean we should forget what happened to those dancers, forget the effect that the environment in which they worked had on them or blame them for succumbing to it, as though these are all individual failings or forget that it is still happening. When we see or hear of choreographers and artistic directors doing the same thing we should forthrightly condemn it. When we see a culture that encourages this view of women and their bodies, we should work to change it.
Posted 31 January 2001 - 08:23 AM
As an audience member, I enjoy one Balanchine work on a mixed bill. I know I will see a work with wonderful phrases, delicious musicality and intellectual challenges. Repeat viewings of one ballet allow me to explore further the choreography, an enjoyable exercise.
Yet, a full evening of any one choreographer leaves me somewhat unsatisfied - save the full lengths.
Posted 31 January 2001 - 10:29 AM
Here in Munich we are lucky that we get to see some on Balanchine's works, and they produce a bit mixed feelings in me - depending in what mood I come to watch the ballet. Many of his ballets are so pure, I need to be fully awake to fully enjoy them. Please don't get me wrong - I consider his style as unique and many of his works as masterpieces (we don't get the unknown ones here, anyway). It's just that after a day of work, it's easier for me to follow a story telling ballet that an abstract one.
When in Edinburgh last summer, I learnt from the programme that he was influenced a lot by the glamourous Broadway girls, and this note helped me understand that "Balanchine type of dancer" a bit better. However, I prefer companies whose dancers get a chance to do a great variety of ballets and styles - although they are probably not as "perfect" in Balanchine as they "ought" to be.
Only recently I saw "Who Cares" - and this one I really fell in love with! And I would love to see "Jewels" sometime.
Posted 31 January 2001 - 11:22 AM
Now, I do not know what SAB/NYCB were like while Balanchine was alive. I don't know how much the style has been distorted over the years, or if it has been kept the same, technically. One thing I notice a great deal is that Balanchine dancers tend to have incredibly tense arms and hands. From my experience, I believe that this is a result of excessive emphasis on speedy leg- and foot-work and a certain amount of neglect of the upper body. As far as I know, Balanchine did want the hands to be placed in that rounded claw position, with fingers poking out every which way, and I do understand that he wanted a more informal port de bras. I have always found it interesting, though, when someone comments that Balanchine hated mannerisms, because Balanchine dancers have the most mannered port de bras I have ever seen. The flowery use of the wrists is especially offensive, aesthetically.
In addition to having almost incorrigible mannerisms in the arms, I find that dancers of this style also tend to have poor posture, caused by excessive emphasis on having the weight too far forward. Never, in all my years at SAB, did I ever once hear a teacher say, "Shoulders back." The result? Dancers with rounded shoulders and heads that jut forward, staring out into the audience blankly.
Now for the legs and feet. Balanchine was said to have liked the look of winged feet, so at SAB, everyone dances on feet that are so pronated as to be injurious. This gave me--and many others--injuries in the ankles, knees, hips, and even back. The physical therapist's room at SAB is filled to the brim with dancers needing help for their lower legs. This is aggravated by jumping, or in fact doing any sort of plie with the heels off the floor. Yes, it allows for a deeper plie, but there is such a tiny amount of the foot on the floor that the plie is hardly worth anything at all. To jump well, it is necessary to push off from the heels--not by placing weight solely on the heels, of course, but by using them to help push off for the jump. If one plies with ones heels down, there is more area of the foot on the ground to contribute to the force necessary for a high jump. Without the heel one the ground, one is essentially jumping from ones toes.
Plies without heels on the floor have consequences besides that of a smaller jump. The achilles tendon can tighten and even snap because it is not being stretched of fully used. This causes tendonitis. And because jumping with no heels on the floor places an enormous amount of strain on the tiny muscles along the shin, shin splints often result, as well.
Returning to the upper body, so many Balanchine-style dancers hold an amazing amoung of tension in the backs of their necks. With the shoulders, upper back and arms carrying tension, and the head simply staring straight ahead, pressure is focused on the back of the neck. I think that this, too, can be the result of having the weight so far forward: the body is leaning so far to the front that the upper-back and neck muscles try their utmost to pull back to keep the dancer from toppling over.
Well, I could go on forever on this topic, but I don't want to put the board to sleep with in-depth technical analyses of every step in the Balanchine book .
Posted 31 January 2001 - 11:34 AM
However, I often go to Paris, and the POB has quite a large Balanchine repertory, even though it has not performed much of it in recent years (this season "Jewels" and "Apollo", last season only "Rubies", two seasons ago "Apollo" and "Concerto Barocco"...) Also I try to catch any opportunity to see Balanchine works performed (such opportunities being unfortunately rare), so since 1993 I saw some works of his performed by the Ballets de Monte-Carlo, the Ballet du Rhin, the Ballet de Nancy, the San Francisco Ballet, the POB school, the Conservatoire of Lyon and the Conservatoire of Paris- also last summer I went to Edinburgh only to see the NYCB during the festival. Also my videos of "Serenade" and
the Balanchine Celebration probably are starting to fade after being viewed too often.
A diet of Balanchine-only would be a bit narrow for me, but I definitely would like to see more of his works.
Posted 31 January 2001 - 09:41 PM
[This message has been edited by BalletNut (edited February 01, 2001).]
Posted 31 January 2001 - 10:00 PM
I think that I should also state that I have a great deal of respect for Balanchine as a choreographer. Even though I don't enjoy watching all of his ballets, many were the balletic equivalent of revolutionary in their days, and his choreographic invention seems to have known no limits.
In addition, after re-reading my post above, I just want to say that I don't think it's impossible for anyone to be trained in the Balanchine style and have a career. Obviously, this is not the case--NYCB is flourishing. Not everyone gets the injuries I listed, even though they are the predominant types of injuries of what are currently called Balanchine-style dancers. I was simply pointing out certain negative aspects of Balanchine training that I experienced; I can point out positive ones easily.
Posted 31 January 2001 - 11:21 PM
Balanchine did have a tremendous range in his ballets- from the romantic Emeralds to the grandness of Theme and Variations, to the inventive "narratives" of Apollo and Prodigal Son. And able to choreograph so quickly. Throughout his repetoire, I find so much wit- wry comments on the music, a style, or maybe even ballet itself. And sometimes, I find so much of it the same. After years of learning his ballets, I begin to feel that there is a formula to learning them. Someone once told me that his works are easy to learn- they always follow a certain logic. This is the truth. It's not a bad thing- it probably happens to anybody who spends so much time immersed in the choreography of one person.
I admit that I have sometime wondered if Balanchine was just a man with great charisma who knew how to keep people around him happy. While I have no doubt that he was a genius choreographer, leaving behind many great ballets, he was also just plain lucky to have been in the right place at the right time.
Posted 01 February 2001 - 05:16 AM
Posted 01 February 2001 - 10:55 AM
Originally posted by leibling:
It is only when the dancers entered the company that they took Balanchine's two hour class. This, I presume, is where the style was taught. In these classes, pirouettes were executed with a straight back knee, legs were lifted, wrists overcrossed, speed emphasized, all those traits indicative of the Balanchine style. But these dancers had already learned a basic, solid ballet technique.
Liebling, you have hit the nail on the head about this, IMO. Balanchine was a choreographer. He taught dancers who were already trained, and he taught them his style. He did not teach children, nor develop a syllabus, and I don't believe he ever set out to establish a "technique". I have enormous respect for his genius as a choreographer, especially his musicality, and I loved dancing his ballets. I don't always enjoy watching them, but often that is because I don't care for the style of the dancers, not because I don't like the ballet itself. I tend to prefer his work danced by other companies more than by NYCB in many cases. But that is a personal preference, and I know puts me in a great minority on this board.
As a teacher, I feel that training students in "Balanchine" (I will not say technique here, but perhaps what has come to be considered Balanchine technique) is not the safest way to train them. There are injuries in every method, of course, but more than the injuries, I don't care for the idea of students learning only one way to do something and becoming extremely stylized while in the training process. A particular style of movement can be learned after there is a clean, pure basic technique established, hopefully without mannerisms.
Posted 01 February 2001 - 10:36 PM
So many aspects of the Balanchine style were created in order to guard against certain aspects of "classical" ballet, such as the overcrossed 5ieme position, overcrossed wrists, clawed hands (to compensate for certain dancers' tendencies to hold all the fingers together), permanent pointe work (to build strength, but it also has the effect of dulling the articulation of the feet and damaging the dancer's sense of her "center"), straight back leg in 4ieme (a wonderful idea, but only in theory, unfortunately), fast adagios, fast ronds de jambe, and fast everything else (this only leads to a lack of control because the dancer merely jerks and twitches instead of controlling his/her movements).
Funny thing, liebling; it's rare to see a dancer begin his/her training at SAB and still have a career in ballet. 95% of the dancers who get in to NYCB were only at SAB a few years--just long enough to pick up the mannerisms, but not enough to really damage their techniques.
Posted 01 February 2001 - 11:14 PM
ABT is coming next week to Miami. I can't wait to see Theme and Variations- to see if I notice a big difference in the way it is performed there, as opposed to a more Balanchine company (such as Miami City Ballet- I haven't seen NYCB in several years).
Posted 02 February 2001 - 05:16 PM
I hope you have a good time at ABT--their T&V should be quite spectacular.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):