Well Estelle, once more, I explain what I meant when I said ""Le Parc" is quite classical": it is not classical in terms of dance vocabulary, it does not use academic language, but it is not an avant-garde work, trying to create something new, and it is quite different from Preljocaj's other works. So I used the term in its ordinary meaning... One more precison: I am not here to defend Mr Preljocaj against "traditionalists", he does not need me and it would be ridiculous. As I said, I am not particularly in love with his work, I am just interested, maybe I have also been touched by some of his creations, despite his "very politically correct" personnality...
I also regret the absence of romantic repertoire, that is my main reproach and the deepest... first because it is our history, second because it is my main interest. But the choreographers you quote and would like to see (Tudor, Robbins...) are not part of our historical repertoire. Why not, but it is a different wish... What about Lacotte's reconstructions of Taglioni's works, a new and entire "Coppélia", "La Source"... There are treasures to discover at the POB library.
Kylian's "Bella Figura": sorry, but I have never seen it... and I am always happy to see the work of this great choreographer.
Balanchine's "Jewels": in fact, I don't really like Balanchine, so I am not really objective, I find him terribly boring, especially when it is danced by our dancers... (to tell the truth, I saw the two NYCB dvd and I discovered something much more interesting), so "Jewels" or another... ("Jewels" is not "the worst")