I trust they still do, otherwise they're risking letting a potentially dangerous situation ferment, resulting in great woe and legal fees. We, or at least I, don't know what the "iota" was in Gomes' case, because he resigned in the middle of the investigation, thus short-circuiting the process even though he was sacrificing a choice position at a company that he could look forward to remaining with after his dancing days were over. It is possible that outrage was his only motive for resignation, of course, but that would seem to have been an impetuous and unwise decision, in contrast to letting the investigation play out, which could well have resulted in a "nothing to see here."