Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Nureyev's Romeo and Juliet


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Giannina

Giannina

    Gold Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 07 January 2005 - 05:15 PM

I've started going thru my glut of Christmas DVD's. First was "Dancer's Dream....Romeo and Juliet" which tells of the rehearsal and production of Nureyev's R&J. Terrific! I now want to get the DVD with the same cast. There's a DVD shown on Amazon; the picture on it is the picture from the DVD starring Legris and Loudieres (which I have) rather than Legris and Maurin. Does anyone know for sure if there's a production with Maurin as Juliet?

Giannina

#2 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,902 posts

Posted 07 January 2005 - 08:31 PM

I'd STRONGLY advise against getting Nureyev's R&J. I found it one of his poorest productions. Here's the review I wrote for Amazon:
----------------
Rudolf Nureyev contributed so much to ballet that it seems ungrateful to criticize his ballet stagings (mostly at the Paris Opera Ballet). Indeed, his La Bayadere staging remains one of the best. But this Romeo and Juliet is simply misguided in so many respects.
For one, Nureyev's staging is way too long, with too many intermittent scenes. The video runs to 150 minutes. MacMillan understood how to juxtapose crowd scenes, character-setting dances, and pas de deux. He overall keeps the ballet moving at an astonishingly fast clip, even though the ballet is very long (about 2 hours). Nureyev's Act 3 has SEVEN scene changes.
Nureyev also does not seem to trust the story itself, and adds a lot of heavyhanded imagery and symbolism. A skeleton is prominently displayed on the scrim before one act, then there is a bit with a grim reaper. Juliet has a dream with the "ghosts" of Tybalt and Mercutio. Because GET IT??? THEYRE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!! Towards the end Romeo has a "pas de deux" with Paris, which is also something nowhere in the MacMillan version. All this symbolism and fatalism not only comes across as heavyhanded, but it also changes the very nature of Shakespeare's play, which despite the "star-crossed lovers" bit is really about the senselessness and miscues and poor timing that cause such pain and tragedy.
I am no prude, but I thought Nureyev was WAY too eager to emphasize the violent aspects of the story. Things do not get very unconventional until Tybalt's death. In this staging it does not seem like an impulsive act of rage on Romeo's part. Instead, there is a very prolonged fight scene, replete with choke holds and dropped swords, and the final death seems like cold-blooded murder. From then on things get more violent. Even the Bedroom Scene between Romeo and Juliet has little intimacy, and a lot of rolling around and grinding. But there's a totally pointless scene on the road to Mantua where the messenger is brutally murdered. It's very graphic and gratuitous. Granted, Renaissance Italy was a very violent time, but all the graphic violence IMO not only pushed the limits of classical ballet but made Romeo and Juliet seem much more unappealing as people, and also are confusions and distractions to the storyline.
As for the dancing, the etoiles of the POB are Manuel Legris and Monique Loudieres. They have absolutely perfect technique, with not a bent leg or misplaced foot in the entire ballet. Their precision is jaw-dropping. But in the end, I feel as if they are unable to convey the youth and romance of these teenaged lovers. They are too mature, too serious, more SEXUAL than SEXY (there's a difference). The POB corps is as usual probably the most uniform and well-trained in the world.
But Romeo and Juliet IMO requires more than accurate footwork and well-placed arabesques. This production by Nureyev simply failed to understand the timeless appeal of the story.

#3 Joseph

Joseph

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 265 posts

Posted 07 January 2005 - 08:38 PM

Yes, I have this version as well (with Legris and Loudiers.) The dancing is very good, but I am not crazy about the choreography and production. Ah, too tired to go into detail now, but I would not reccommend this either. Try to find Paris Opera Ballet's Paquita or Don Quixote - these are both excellent!

#4 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,902 posts

Posted 07 January 2005 - 10:39 PM

Joseph, I agree Paquita is excellent. I also really like the POB's La Bayadere, and the Dancer's Dream documentary that was also released is wonderful too. Isabel Guerin is such a charmer, and so well-spoken.
What I hated the most about the POB R&J was the coldness of it all. Despite the gore, sex, and violence, there was none of the impetuosity and tenderness that can make R&J so moving. Plus, R&J has been exceptionally lucky on video: there's the Fonteyn/Nureyev (still my standard), Ferri/Eagling, Ferri/Corella, and the old Bolshoi film with Ulanova. Legris/Loudieres were by far the least moving and well-cast star-crossed lovers.

#5 kfw

kfw

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,320 posts

Posted 08 January 2005 - 10:46 AM

Giannina or canbelto, could you say more about the documentary? I have a Christmas gift certificate from Barnes and Noble I'm going to use for ballet DVDs.

#6 canbelto

canbelto

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,902 posts

Posted 08 January 2005 - 11:51 AM

For the La Bayadere, there are lots of interviews of Guerin, Platel, and Hilaire (the three principals originally in the revival). There's footage of rehearsals, although Nureyev had obviously passed on by the time the documentary was made. Some historical information on La Bayadere, and a nice sequence that showed the Shades scene in rehearsal and then cut to performance. Guerin is exceptionally well-spoken and reflective, and even though there's a brief clip of Nureyev coming onstage at the opening night of La Bayadere shortly before his death, the documentary is mostly about his legacy of dancers, and how they are still influenced by him. The rehearsals are interesting to watch, and as usual the coaches painstakingly explore every step.
A nice documentary.

#7 Giannina

Giannina

    Gold Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 08 January 2005 - 12:45 PM

kfw...I haven't seen the other Dancer's Dream DVD's but now I'm itching to do so. In the one about R&J you get comments and impressions from the coach (a Nureyev-Juliet) and the dancers. You watch the rehearsals and then see that segment on stage quickly afterwards. The dancing is superb, and seeing it makes me all the more upset the POB might venture in a direction less classical.

Giannina

#8 Estelle

Estelle

    Platinum Circle

  • Foreign Correspondent
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,706 posts

Posted 08 January 2005 - 02:53 PM

Giannina, as far as I know, there is no DVD of "Romeo and Juliet" with Legris and Maurin, only the one with Legris and Loudières.

By the way, there isn't actually many available videos of Maurin, as far I know (and it's likely there won't be much, as she's going to retire at the end of this season): she was filmed in 1988 in Nureyev's "Nutcracker" (the role in which she was promoted to principal), and as far as I know that's all. Pity...


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):