Jump to content


DTH disbands "temporarily"


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 18 September 2004 - 07:04 AM

Copied from Links for discussion:

Tatsha Robertson of the Boston Globe reports that Dance Theatre of Harlem will disband for the rest of the 2004-2005 season to restructure:

http://www.boston.co..._to_end_season/

NEW YORK -- The Dance Theatre of Harlem, one of the most acclaimed dance troupes in the world, plans to disband its 44-member company and shut its doors for the rest of the 2004-05 season until its finances can be restructured, a dance union official said yesterday.
 
"They are taking a hiatus to restructure finances. It's no secret it has been quite challenging . . . so they made the decision with conversations with us that they want to go on hiatus for one year," said Deborah Allton, national dance executive director for The American Guild of Musical Artists, the dance union.



#2 MJ

MJ

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts

Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:19 PM

NY Sunday News today:

http://www.nydailyne...0p-200521c.html

Founder a threat to Dance Theatre


Call it Founder's Syndrome. Someone with a good heart, great intentions and wonderful talent starts an organization that takes off to much acclaim - then the founder doesn't know when to leave the stage.

The Dance Theatre of Harlem seems to have a fatal case. Arthur Mitchell, a pioneer black ballet dancer who founded what he calls a "a neoclassic dance company" in the aftermath of the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, cannot afford this year to mount anything other than a curtailed version of the usual season. Much of the staff has been laid off - probably a euphemism for being let go permanently. Dancers are looking for jobs elsewhere. The administrator is pretty much a part-time volunteer. The board of directors has disbanded. The corporate sponsorship on which the company previously relied is no longer there. And besides, there are other cultural institutions with more edge that attract the private - or public - support that's out there for the arts.


Edited by Alexandra, 19 September 2004 - 06:25 PM.


#3 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 19 September 2004 - 06:26 PM

Thanks for the link, MJ. (We can't post whole articles here because of copyright laws, so I edited a bit, just leaving the first two paragraphs as a quote.)

#4 Juliet

Juliet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 720 posts

Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:16 PM

Well, Shipp is brave enough to say publicly what has been said privately for a long while now.
Best of luck to all the dancers......

#5 fandeballet

fandeballet

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 212 posts

Posted 19 September 2004 - 07:26 PM

It is a shame, I saw them last year at the State Theater. They were/are a talented company. BUT, this move is a neccessary evil, to save the future, if possible, of this company. I think the school is OK though, right?????? :)

#6 Leigh Witchel

Leigh Witchel

    Editorial Advisor

  • Editorial Advisor
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,466 posts

Posted 20 September 2004 - 07:48 AM

One way in which DTH's situation is different than other companies is that I believe (but can't find confirmation on their website) that Mitchell is also President of the Board of Directors. This is not common in larger companies, much more so in smaller, choreographer driven ones (I'm president of DAE, for instance, who else would be dumb enough to be?) For good or for ill, it's run as his company.

#7 sandik

sandik

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,349 posts

Posted 20 September 2004 - 08:44 AM

One way in which DTH's situation is different than other companies is that I believe (but can't find confirmation on their website) that Mitchell is also President of the Board of Directors.  This is not common in larger companies, much more so in smaller, choreographer driven ones (I'm president of DAE, for instance, who else would be dumb enough to be?) For good or for ill, it's run as his company.

The transition from "the founder does everything" to a more diffused structure is tricky, and has been a fatal process for several groups, but it has been many years since DTH has been small enough for that kind of administration to be efficient. I'm very concerned about the company, both for the current group, and for the long-term life of the institution, but it sounds like they have no choice.

#8 MJ

MJ

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts

Posted 20 September 2004 - 09:23 AM

What is truly sad is the future of the dancers, some of who dreamt their whole lives of dancing in DTH.

The school may survive, but tuition may go up as the company will not perform for fundraisers.

NYC will not let this cultural institution go quietly into the night, but many changes will need to happen from a management point of view. The Apollo theatre went through the same thing during the Dinkins administration, bankrupcy and house cleaning were absolutely necessary.

I would strongly recommend to the arts community to create a dancer's fund for the DTH dancers, to bide them over while the DTH reorganizes. Giving money to DTH now is futile.


Whoever runs DTH needs to look south of 110th street for future stability and growth. There are plenty of performance spaces in manhattan to attract ballet fans and financial support. Lincoln center now has a Jazz orchestra, why not an African American Ballet company?

Does DTH perfporm a Nutz? I love the Duke ellington version of Tch's suite. Can NYC support ANOTHER Nutz?

-Mike

#9 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 21 September 2004 - 04:05 PM

Thanks to Liebs for this link.

Crain's New York Business Daily has a story about this today:

Dance Theatre of Harlem details turnaround plan

Dance Theatre of Harlem announced today that it would lay off its 44 dancers and close the company until July 1, 2005, the end of the fiscal year. The 35-year-old nonprofit has a deficit of close to $2.5 million.

The world-renowned dance company has been struggling for the last year. Its board has dwindled down to two outside members from a onetime high of 17, and last February it laid off almost all of its support staff.


Lots of detail here -- thanks, Liebs!

#10 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 21 September 2004 - 10:48 PM

Time-Warner Cable's news station, New York 1, played a brief interview with Mitchell. You can click to view video or read the summary.

The silver lining is that, according to Mitchell, the school and other educational programs will stay active.

#11 MJ

MJ

    Senior Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 189 posts

Posted 24 September 2004 - 11:38 AM

The NY1 headline says the company will go on a two-YEAR hiatus while the article says it will be two months. Hopefully it will be the shorter.

Will DTH still perform at City Center next month at that dance festival?

#12 GeorgeB fan

GeorgeB fan

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 250 posts

Posted 24 September 2004 - 12:56 PM

This maybe a blessing in disguise. If Arthur Mitchell simply give up some responsible mainly in the business aspect of the company and simply work on the artistic aspect of the company maybe, just maybe someone will come along and successfully restructure the business part and DTH will be able to continue to do what they have always done best: extraordinary performances of extraordinary ballets as only DTH can.

#13 Nanatchka

Nanatchka

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 374 posts

Posted 24 September 2004 - 01:09 PM

Will DTH still perform at City Center next month at that dance festival?

Note the billing is not Dance Theatre of Harlem, but "artists from Dance Theatre of Harlem." Still on the bill. Agon pas de deux, I think.

#14 Dale

Dale

    Emeralds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,021 posts

Posted 02 October 2004 - 12:08 PM

In the current Time Out New York, Gia Kourlas reported on the DTH news conference. At the end of her article, she suggested that dancers such as Tai Jimenez and Alicia Graf would "make lovely additions to New York City Ballet." Such hirings would further DTH's aim in integrating ballet. The idea of Graf at NYCB is very interesting. It would be a nice gesture to open some spots for guest artists from DTH while the that company regroups - not one-off nights - but as guest for the season. What do others think?

#15 eland

eland

    Member

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 16 October 2004 - 02:05 PM

I think it would be wonderful for other companies to offer work to some dancers from Dance theatre of harlem.
Call it divine providence or luck, but Boston Ballet hired a young man about a month ago who was with Dance theatre of Harlem.
I haven't seen the company in a while, but I know Tai Jiminez and she is a beautiful dancer. I've also heard that Alicia is nice. It would be a great gesture by NYCB or ABT for that mater or any company at this point to do something...
I think a large challenge for DTH is going to be finding a business manager who knows what they're doing and who Mr. Mitchell will "trust"
with his Baby. I think it has to be someone who has danced in a major company or has a vast knowledge of the arts and has had to face similar challenges Mr. Mitchell did as a dancer and a director, but who knows how to make a business plan that will both help the company with it's problems and ensure the Legacy of Arthur Mitchell....
Well, hopefully something will work out...


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):