Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

Rosa

Senior Member
  • Posts

    490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rosa

  1. From the Bolshoi site:

    Ruslan Skvortsov is promoted from Leading Soloist to Principal; Yekaterina Krysanova - from First Soloist to Leading Soloist; Anna Antropova, Anna Nikulina, Vyacheslav Lopatin, Ivan Vasiliev are promoted from Soloists to First Soloists; Anastasia Stashkevich, Yuri Baranov, Pavel Dmitrichenko, Artem Ovcharenko - from Artists to Soloists.
  2. I found this production visually stunning. Beautiful costumes and sets. I liked Burmeister's choreography; I thought it was a very clever touch having Odile appear at various times during the international dances in Act III, vanishing as Siegfried rushed for a closer look. He was all set up to be duped by the PDD. The La Scala corps I thought were very good in the first and third acts, a notch down in the white acts. Bolle was a noble handsome prince and good partner, yet didn't seem involved emotionally. I found Zakharova too cool as Odette, yet a perfectly wicked Odile.

    I was puzzled by the end of Act III. Siegfried did not swear to love Odile (at least not that I could tell). So why did she and Rothbart leave the ball in such triumph, and Siegfried in such anguish? What had he done that was so terrible? Perhaps someone familiar with this production can help me understand...

  3. Ketinoa had at least two versions of the complete 1890 Sleeping Beauty reconstruction, which many would never have seen otherwise. And at least one of them included Veronika Part as the Lilac Fairy.

    I believe it was the premiere with Vishneva and Fadeev that featured Part's Lilac Fairy.

    Ketinoa's videos gave me the opportunity to see dancers (past, present, and perhaps future) and ballets I will likely never see live. She is greatly missed.

  4. Sounds like juicy reading, Rosa. What distinguishes the Really Bad Girls of the Bible from just the Bad Girls? And is Washington’s Lady a biographical novel or a biography? I've always been partial to biographical novels, even the less than great ones.

    That is a good question, dirac. All the girls in both books are shady characters. What may distinguish the really bad girls is that what they did was considered very terrible in their time (and today): dabbling in the dark arts, committing scandalous adultery, murdering (and in some cases lovin' it), passing off as a prostitute, and suffering from an illness that labeled the woman as a sinner and being untouchable.

    Washington's Lady is a historical novel. I enjoyed it very much.

    I'm reading Elizabeth Gaskell for pleasure. :)

  5. And what are you reading this summer?

    So far...

    Mary Barton by Elizabeth Gaskell

    Washington's Lady by Nancy Moser

    Slightly Bad Girls of the Bible by Liz Curtis Higgs

    Bad Girls of the Bible by Liz Curtis Higgs

    Really Bad Girls of the Bible by Liz Curtis Higgs

    Cast Two Shadows by Ann Rinaldi

  6. I just got 'round to watching my recording of the broadcast.

    The camera work left a bit to be desired. Quite a number of times half of a main dancer's body was cut off from the screen. Distracting.

    To me this came across as an abstract sort of Romeo and Juliet, with most of the dancers simply dancing their characters, not being the characters. While set in a historic time, something about this performance -- I can't place my finger on what -- seemed to give it a 21st century vibe.

    I didn't mind the single...box, unit that served as the set too much. But the costumes were very unappealing, particularly Tybalt's and Juliet's. (Was none of her family embarrassed that Paris saw her in her short short short (night)dress??)

    Martins' choreography was uninteresting. The balcony PPD did not seem to build with the music. The bedroom pas de deux I interpreted as Juliet dealing with her cousin's death, whether to reject Romeo or forgive/love him, instead of delaying his departure as in other versions. The Mandolin Dance had the strongest choreography IMO.

    In Act I I did not care much for Sterling Hyltin's Juliet and Robert Fairchild's Romeo, especially in the ballroom; I was not able to believe that they fell in love like *snaps fingers* that. Yet as Act II went on I warmed up to their performance more and more, and by the end was quite impressed. Lovely dancing and good acting from both.

    The best parts of this production were Antonio Carmena's and Daniel Ulbricht's fantastic Benvolio and Mercutio, and the realistic sword fights.

  7. The premiere of a new production of Yakobsen's full-length Shuraleh takes place on June 29, repeated June 30.

    http://www.mariinsky.ru/en/news1/pressa/xviiwnf_programme/

    Casting is now up.

    June 28

    Siyumbike: Yevgenia Obraztsova

    Ali-Batyr: Mikhail Lobukhin

    Shurale: Leonid Sarafanov

    http://www.mariinsky.ru/en/playbill/playbi...09/6/28/1_2000/

    June 29

    Siyumbike: Yekaterina Osmolkina

    Ali-Batyr: Denis Matvienko

    Shurale: to be announced

    http://www.mariinsky.ru/en/playbill/playbi...09/6/29/1_1900/

×
×
  • Create New...