Jump to content

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Matthew Gurewitsch's article on La Bayadere in the NY Times

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

#16 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 06 January 2005 - 11:13 PM

As long as a ballet continues to engage its audience in beauty, and provides continuing interest in its content, be it narrative, choreographic, or musical, it is fair game for production. I never particularly cared for Balanchine's "extended version" of Act II "Swan Lake", and the critics can write about the "waves of dancers" in the last movement of the ballet, it never grabbed me. I knew that that last movement was Act IV music, and I didn't like it, no sir, didn't like it a bit. Now, compared to Martins' totally inadequate end-of-first-lakeside scene, it would be a welcome relief.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):