Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

diane

Senior Member
  • Posts

    478
  • Joined

Posts posted by diane

  1. I do think that it is important to allow for many types of dance to co-exist and if possible to help them in their existence. (that could well mean allotting tax money)

    Personally I prefer watching things which take time to learn and perfect. There is something about absolute control which I find fascinating - and something about lack of control which I find boring after a very short time. (one reason I prefer some painters/composers/writers over others)

    Now, this is a bit of an off-shoot, but it does have its basis in what we are discussing here:

    What does bother me about many of the contemporary dance styles and techniques is the apparent lack of really good training for the dancers in a well-thought-out technique supporting the style they are to perform, so that they do not end up injuring themselves more than the normal "fatigue" or "careless" injuries.

    There are not a few contemporary choreographers (those alive now) who work largely in "finding new language" and "new ways of movement".

    That is wonderful, and can be indeed very exciting to watch - and fun to do.

    I hear a lot about what goes on behind the scenes. (having been a dancer myself and now mother to two in the profession,)

    It appears that too many choreographers working towards "new movement" are not taking into account the toll it is taking on the bodies of the dancers; who are, regrettably, "a dime a dozen" and so highly replaceable.

    :)

    -d-

  2. The first time I saw this (the original) I was utterly convinced that it was a joke.

    I must admit that I was quite shocked to discover that, no, probably the people who made it were serious! :o

    The parodies are wonderful.

    I do feel sorry for the original model, who surely did her best and had no idea what she was getting herself into.

    (I also think the text was NOT her own)

    -d-

  3. Very interesting! Thank you for bringing this to my attention.

    I saw Tanztheater Wuppertal a few times back in the early 80s.

    Just a few months ago I had the opportunity to go back and see another performance (not one I had seen before, though).

    The difference between the "older" dancers, those who had actually worked with Pina for many years (and there are still more than just a few, it seems, actively performing) and the newer, younger ones was somewhat striking.

    It is as if the newer dancers are more involved with the steps, such as they are, and they faithfully "reproduce" what was before. It does not seem "spontaneous" and as if they "own" what they are doing. Or so it seemed to me. Surely just subjective.

    The comparison with Stuttgart Ballet under Cranko and now is intriguing. Of course, Cranko died a very long time ago; the company has had a lot of time to find their way and incorporate his "spirit" into the current company without turning him into an icon.

    I also wonder if the fact that a ballet dancers' career is often significantly shorter than a dancer who does the sort of thing Pina Bausch did could have any influence on the way things are going?

    Or are they all financial reasons? Wuppertal is not Stuttgart, by any means.

    It will be interesting to see what happens; how things develop.

    -d-

  4. ^^ At least in Germany, where there are a large number of professional ballet companies, the languages most often used in the studio are English, French and Russian. (with local differences, depending on how many speakers of what languages are in the company and which the director/s speak/s).

    Most Europeans nowadays are at least bi-lingual, and many also have working knowledge of other languages, too.

    Pretty cool, actually.

    -d-

  5. Very interesting. :)

    I am not an active dancer anymore, and when I was dancing, contemporary works were not quite as widespread nor as overtly athletic as they have since become. That said, I had similar experiences, in that after dancing a contemporary piece it took a bit of work to get back to where I needed to be for classical pieces.

    If there were not full six times/ week ballet trainings offered to the company, then technique tended to suffer; it was harder to find my "centre" again.

    I am sure there are other dancers who can comment more thoroughly!

    -d-

  6. I think the main problem - everywhere - is that not everything which is truly worthwhile can "pull its own weight"; this goes for public transportation, babies, science research, education, open wild spaces, theatre and the arts. (and probably a bunch of other things, but I wanted to try to be pithy)

    We as humans in societies have to be careful that we realise and accept this and then make amends - we have to be willing to pay for things, even if we do not get immediate, monetary "rewards".

    -sigh-

    -d-

  7. Very interesting how different countries/cultures go about funding things which are important to them. (especially "fringe" things, such as youth activities and "cultural" ones)

    There are countries, notably some of the Scandinavian ones, where reportedly most citizens would disapprove of a lowering of taxes, as they are quite aware of all the things which taxes fund and make possible in their communities.

    That does not appear to be the case everywhere.

    -d-

×
×
  • Create New...