Jump to content

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Alexandra


    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,301 posts

Posted 20 February 2002 - 11:58 AM

Tim Page's review of the Kirov-Mariinski ballet and opera gala contains this about Tchaikovsky. What do you think?

"Coming to terms with Tchaikovsky is a puberty rite for many listeners. Upon first hearing, we love him for the unbridled passion and grandeur of his music. Later on, we may go through a phase when it all seems a bit much -- the swooping strings, the hypercharged emotionalism, the intense subjectivity -- and react against him. Finally, in what passes for full maturity, we return to Tchaikovsky and discover him once again, this time for keeps. By now, we are willing to forgive some occasional bursts of effusion so long as we can savor those marvelous warm melodies and lose ourselves in his eternally inventive orchestration."

#2 Melissa


    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 104 posts

Posted 20 February 2002 - 12:51 PM

Tchaikovsky's music was a 'rite of puberty' for me, having fallen in love with his music at the age of 13 ('Sleeping Beauty' did it). But I never went through the middle stage the author mentions. I'm a proud Peter Ilyitch fanatic and will be till my dying day. The man was a genius and his radiant, wearing his heart on his sleeve melodies and innovative orchestration have stood the test of time.

#3 Alexandra


    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,301 posts

Posted 20 February 2002 - 01:00 PM

I'm glad you said it first smile.gif I never went through Tchaikovsky withdrawal either. I fell in love with him at 6. My first piano recital piece was a baby version of "Marche Slav." There was a little bio that said he was a Russian and that Russians were fatalists. I didn't know what a fatalist was, but it sounded lovely. I looked up Russia in the Atlas and found that Lithuania (where my father's family came from) was part of the Soviet Union. Politics were not a concern at that age, and for years I thought I was Russian and loved being a fatalist smile.gif

In that way, Tchaikovsky is perfect for adolescents; there I agree with Page. Tchaikovsky and Dostoyevsky smile.gif I didn't know the Tchaikovsky of Sleeping Beauty until I discovered ballet. Those melodies are still in my head, after having the pleasure of hearing (almost) the full score for the better part of a week smile.gif

Anyone come to Tchaikovsky reluctantly? Or still prefer to stay away smile.gif

#4 Mme. Hermine

Mme. Hermine

    Rubies Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,148 posts

Posted 20 February 2002 - 01:19 PM

never! i grew up in a household without much classical music. the only tchaikovsky i knew for a long time was a record with excerpts from different composers which contained the polonaise from 'eugene onegin', and that was enough till i heard the rest. i remain hopelessly in love with his music and quite happy to say so!

#5 choreo


    New Member

  • Member
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 21 February 2002 - 01:46 AM

What a good topic! Rediscovering his works is always exciting. A few days ago I popped in his Serenade for Strings, which I hadn't listened to in years (my ecclectic tastes constantly change in regard to music listening) and also, because I ahd the wonderful opportunity to dance in Serenade I couldn't listen to the music objecively without thinking about that particular ballet. Before performing it, I listed to his Serenade for Strings with a different ear. Now a few years have passed since performing that, and now am finally able to listen to it without a huge balletic association. As for his other ballet works, there is always an overwhelming association with the choreography so I just don't bother. Serenade for Strings always holds a new surprise for me, whether it is because of a different recording, or a slight nuance, etc. Tchaikovsky is just a blast sometimes smile.gif
PS: How do other dancers feel when knowing a piece of music, and then performing to it? How do your attitudes change (or not) concerning that music?

[ February 21, 2002: Message edited by: choreo ]

#6 Alexandra


    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,301 posts

Posted 21 February 2002 - 02:03 AM

Choreo, I was just going to ask you about how you, as a dancer, listen to music associated with roles -- and then you posted the question. I'm going to move that to a separate post -- I think it's an excellent question. Thank you smile.gif

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):