Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

mnacenani

Inactive Member
  • Posts

    674
  • Joined

Posts posted by mnacenani

  1. 8 hours ago, volcanohunter said:

    Yes, the 2017-18 season announcement states explicitly (in Russian) that it is the "transfer of Alexei Ratmansky's production at the National Ballet of Canada (Toronto, 2011)" and includes a couple of quotes from reviews in Canadian papers.

     

    Thank you volcanohunter for pointing this out, hadn't thought of looking it up. Must say it was lucky for me

    to bring this subject up - I was waiting for Balshoy booking to open on Aug. 26th to get tix for this production,

    thought it would be new choreography specific to Balshoy. I'm not going to spend money on this, would rather

    go and see the original at Mariinka sometime. For Balshoy it could make sense to stage the Ratmansky R&J as

    opposed to Strapless or something !

  2. 13 minutes ago, JMcN said:

     

    Will it be the version he created for National Ballet of Canada?

     

    There is no credits info yet on Ratmansky R&J under Balshoy repertory tab. This R&J will be cinecast next January 21st :

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/dance/what-to-see/watch-bolshoi-ballet-preview-ballet-cinema-season-world-premiere/

     

    May very well be the NBC staging but I doubt whether Balshoy would mention that. Will enquire from friends in Moscow.

  3. 7 hours ago, Drew said:

    I liked what I took to be Ratmansky's allusions to the traditions of the Royal Danish Ballet -- the company on which he set the ballet. But he has choreographed far more successful ballets for sure.

     

    Balshoy has scheduled Romeo&Juliet for 22-26 November which my friend in Moscow says will be the

    new staging by Ratmansky ....... awaiting that one with trepidation !  Current Grigarovich version of

    R&J is imho a non-starter, has made a hash of the beautiful Lavrovsky original. I definitely belong in

    the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" school !

  4. 16 minutes ago, Drew said:

    However, In New York I saw Kondaurova dance Anna and thought it was one of the greatest dramatic dance performances I had ever scene.  And that made the ballet more than worth it to have seen.

     

    Dear Drew :  I saw Kondaurova for the first time at Mariinsky in July in Preljokaj's Le Parc ..... only reason why I grit my teeth and

    didn't join those who walked out. Was very impressed by her performance, must see her in the great Petipa classics sometime

    next season (the hall would have emptied quite significantly had there been an interval :o

  5. Paxita (Paquita) Mariinsky Theater Thu 15 June Teryoshkina-Askerov

     

    Please let me explain before reporting my post for deletion : I did not see the Paquita Grand Pas which

    was part of Contrasts at the ROH this week, but I saw the Grand Pas twice in Piter in June. It was presented

    as the second part of the Vaganova Academy Graduation Performance on June 14 and the full ballet (?) was

    performed by Mariinsky the next evening. I would like to post my take on Paquita in the hope of provoking

    our learned members' comments which will gain me more knowledge and insight.

     

    Prior to the said trip I had never seen Paquita live or recorded, and to do my homework watched the DVD of

    the 2003 Lacotte POB staging with Letestu-Martinez. However once in Piter my tutor told me that there is no

    definitive version of Paquita since everything except the 3rd act Grand Pas was lost, and usually this only was

    performed as what were performed as the full ballet anywhere were crude "reconstructions" of the lost first

    and second acts. So on the first night I saw the classic Petipa Grand Pas (tweaked a little by Tsiskaridze, cannot

    tell you where) performed by the Vaganova Academy graduation class and lower classes, supplemented by a few

    former graduates if I understood correctly, starring Eleonora Sevenard.  This was great ..... wonderful classic ballet

    as I would like to see time and again. (however, I did not fall in love at first sight with Sevenard, like I did with the

    star of the previous graduation class Alyona Kovalyova. Alyona is supposed to dance Odette/Odile at one of the

    two Swan Lake matinees next month and I am checking the casting every day, not posted yet, with the full inten-

    tion of making a day trip to see her live)

     

    The next evening it was the "full" three-act Paquita, this one "reconstructed" by Mariinsky dancer-cum-choreographer

    Yuriy Smekalov. As you could expect, the first two acts had nothing to do with the Lacotte version. If I remember

    correctly Smekalov staged "The Bronze Horseman" last year and not everyone was well pleased with that one. In

    any case :  imho the first act music and choreography was nothing to write home about, boring. In the second act

    the music and dancing got better and I would say it was watchable. On the plus side my beloved Renata Shakirova

    appeared as Carducha, the bad scheming girl - I think she is just a great dancer and "personality", my big discovery

    of 2015.

     

    Now the third act :  I would say one detects immediately that this is the real thing, and the first two acts were obviously

    faked by "pretenders". I could also see this five nights in a row, wonderful classic ballet, music and choreo an all. No

    wonder so many companies dance only this part and don't bother with trying to stage a "full" version, that there can be

    no such thing is crystal clear. Teryoshkina was wonderful, I didn't quite click with Askerov but he made up for it as Basil

    in Don Kixot last week. But between you and me : I somehow liked more the Vaganova presentation of the third act I

    saw the night before, cannot give any concrete reason, could it have the edge slightly in terms of sync, symmetry and

    separation, could this be possible vs the Mighty Mariinsky ??

     

    Would love to hear from seasoned membership, credits and synopsis for Paquita version I saw :

    https://www.mariinsky.ru/en/playbill/playbill/2017/6/15/1_1900

  6. Letter from London ...
    Don Kixot / ROH London / Saturday 5 August eve
    Mariinsky Ballet / Matvienko - Askerov


    Would like to start by listing my credentials relating to Don Kixot, since my views will surely be contested by
    all of my tutors and some of my friends. Since January 2015 I have seen Don Kixot live 9 times danced by 8
    different Kitris : Tsygankova, Shakirova, Alexandrova, Krysanova, Soboleva, Zaharova, Germizeeva, and
    Matvienko ..... in addition to probably same number of stagings with different principals on DVD, from Royal
    Ballet, Mariinsky, Dutch National Ballet , Cuban National Ballet, La Scala, Paris Opera Ballet etc etc. I could
    conduct the whole thing from memory if I knew baton technique ...... any questions ??

    This evenings performance was extremely enjoyable, as I discovered another "natural" Kitri : Nastya Matvienko
    and an excellent Basilio in Timur Askerov, who I did not rate very highly on the basis of what I had seen of him
    before. My amateur eye could see no lapses in Nastya's excellent technique, and she brought the house down
    with a very fast perfectly executed 32 single fouettées in the grand pas. Askerov's tech may not yet be on par with
    the best of the Balshoy's male leads but he was extremely good both technically and re characterisation. Kitri's friends
    were good if not outstanding, Olga Belik as Mercedes was excellent as usual, but Gimadiyeva who I am told is a new-
    comer was outstanding as Cupid - one wonders where do the Russian ballet companies find so many excellent Cupids,
    one after the other - are they cloning them or what ?? Shakirova did the act 3 grand pas variation but the brief solo was
    enough to show her class to anyone not acquainted. The evening's only performance which I will say was below par was
    the street dancer of Chebykina. Dryads' Queen Ivannikova was sort of OK but imho did not shine, thought I had seen
    better ones.

    I really needed this, to detox any remaining traces of Le Parc I absorbed last month in Piter. Anna Karenina could not have
    done it, Don Kixot is so wonderfully uplifting when danced and acted to perfection - I really could see it five nights in a row
    with different principals. Gorgeous tuneful music, wonderful choreography, universal and timeless story even a kid can make
    out first time ..... no "gardeners" or "mothers-in-law" present or required ..... what more can a true ballet lover ask for ???
  7. Letter from London ...

    Anna Karenina / ROH London / Thu 3 August
    Mariinsky Ballet : Vishnyova - Zverev


    I had previously seen the Eifman Ballet version a couple of times on Mezzo, music a potpourri of sequences from Chikofsky, am not
    sure where the "train approaching" finale was taken from. Thought this had excellent pdd but rather meaningless, movement for move-
    ment's sake ensembles.

    London is awful in the summer (as is Moscow and Peterburg and so many others) and every time I make a resolution not to travel to Lon-
    don ever in the summer, but again broke it and booked to see Diana as AK thinking this may be one of the last few occasions one could
    see her on stage. It was after seeing Diana as Juliet with Shklyarov 4 years ago that I fell head over heels for Russian classical ballet.

    She is so engrained in my mind as Juliet that I had difficulty accepting her as Giselle or Nikiya or in any role other than Juliet I saw her

    dance ....... a case of obsessive compulsive personality disorder ? Anyway it's against this background that I arrived at the ROH last
    evening for my first sampling of the Schedrin-Ratmansky AK, just to be able to see Diana.

    Ratmansky's AK is short, barely 90 minutes, and when you take into account Schedrin's music it's a relief that it is not any longer. I  do

    have a good ear for music but the "circus music" for the "Gipodrom" scene aside cannot remember any melodic sequence whatsoever.

    I did know the story of AK and "a story" is discernible from what is presented on the stage - something I attach great importance to. The

    choreo of the first scene I thought had too great a similarity to Mayerling to be coincidental. Then on full use is made of modern stage

    mechanics and special fx - one cannot help thinking how great works like R&J, Bayaderka and Giselle are which have no need for such

    things to prop them up.

    What drove the performance last night was Diana :  take Diana away and I probably would have walked out at the interval along with quite

    a few other people who did. Diana is a one-off : the grand mistress of mime, her eyes only would be sufficient even if she did not move any

    of her facial muscles. But Ratmansky is not Lavrovsky, and Schedrin is no Prokofiev to be able to make full use of Diana's God-given, once-

    in-a-millennium talent. Diana and Shklyarov as Romeo and Juliet, with that music which makes one suspect the hand of God at play, and that

    choreography, could make a grown man cry ..... how do I know ??  Takes one to know one I suppose .....

    Back to Anna Karenina : this needs a great talent like Diana to be effective, Vronsky and Karenin cannot save the performance. Last night

    Zverev made an aloof portrayal, maybe as should be, but did not capture me in any way and I could not help thinking how Ovcharenko would

    have acted this role. For me, Anna Karenina was the second best role I saw Diana act, after Juliet. This story has, had, the potential to become

    a great work like Romeo and Juliet ....... had Prokofiev and Lavrovsky set themselves to the task. My wife is more receptive and tolerant of con-

    temporary works than me, and has famously said that I watch contemporary ballet "like a cow watches a passing train" !  But when a friend asked

    me last night what her reaction to Anna Karenina was, she said "could see it again sometime if I am invited and have nothing better to do on that

    night" .....

  8. On 6/8/2017 at 1:08 PM, MadameP said:

     

    Yes, so I understand.  She was offered contracts at both Mariinsky and Bolshoi apparently, but she chose Bolshoi.  

     

    Saw Sevenard live on June 14th as Paquita when Vaganova staged the 3rd act as part of their graduation

    show. I thought she was very good but I did not fall in love with her at first sight, if you know what I mean.

     

    Now back to Alyona Kovalyova - it is being said that Alyona will appear as Odette/Odile at one mat or eve

    when Balshoy stages "Lebedinoye Ozero" on September 15>17. Dear God - I must go see this one but when

    firm casting is posted ticket prices will have gone through the roof on the "open market". If this rumour turns

    out to be true Alyona will be my second bullseye in two seasons, the other one was Shakirova. Seems even

    65+ newcomers to classical ballet can spot talent !  :clapping:

  9. Dear Ashton Fan thank you so much for this post - I really appreciate the time and thought you have

    devoted to it, and it has been of great interest to me. Yes - I would like to see Osipova in her signature

    classic roles rather than McGregor or Wheeldon stuff. I will certainly try to see her as Giselle and Manon,

    as Odette/Odile maybe - SL is not my favourite ballet. I would love to see her as Juliet : I am interested in

    ballet as drama. And I will not hide the fact that I have been afraid she would slide back in London, not

    having to keep up with the likes of Zaharova, Smirnova, Alexandrova or Krysanova. I know my likes

    are quite subjective and biased, as I have become quite addicted to Russian classical ballet. It's a diffe-

    rent world there.

    Re Wheeldon : I have not seen Strapless but had read the reviews - if I remember correctly Ismene Brown

    had posted a devastating one. Where I live I watch ballet on Mezzo almost every evening, tried to watch

    Alice in Wonderland to educate myself but could only take less than one hour of it, if you will excuse my

    saying so.

    I wish I had seen a second cast of Mayerling while I was there, like you did, to be able to judge the charac-

    terisation of different dancers - I do like studying characterisation.

    You did not comment on Mayerling's music : on a scale of ten I give it say two. I believe I have a good ear

    for music but cannot remember any tune from the score. Film music, but even that is more tuneful most of

    the time. Don't know whether this was also intentional or not.

  10. 2 hours ago, Natalia said:

    Edward Watson's Prince Rudolf was filmed for DVD during an earlier run, as JMcN may be aware:

     

    https://www.amazon.com/Mayerling-Liszt/dp/B003757W0G/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1493658763&sr=1-1&keywords=Mayerling+ballet

     

    Dear Natalia I just finished watching this performance recorded in October 2009, with Watson-Galeazzi. With the scene cues page

    of the booklet in hand to identify who is who ! Sarah Lamb is Larisch and McRae Bratfisch, and incidentally Polunin is one of the

    Hungarian officers. My Moscow tutor Vita texted that she had seen Polunin as Rudolf (probably at Stasik last year) and thought

    he was excellent in role. Now : drink, drugs, sex, freaking out ...... I do believe Sergey would be excellent in this role and I would

    someday love to see Sergey and Natasha in Mayerling.

    There is a still earlier RB recording with Mukhamedov-Durante filmed in February 1994 which I will watch next. Larisch is Collier

    and Mitzi is Bussell, and on this Adam Cooper is one of the Hungarian officers !  I will put up with this to reach a final conclusion

    on the merits of Mayerling, since two ballet people whose opinion I value think Mayerling is a good work but may not reveal its

    beauty at first sight .....

  11. 12 hours ago, JMcN said:

    PS - Do you mean 28th April 2017?

     

    Yes this past Friday eve, the premiere with Osipova debuting in role. As Hanna Weibye posted on Artsdesk there were

    10 principals on stage, as star-studded a cast as one will ever get. Now I will post my own take on the work and this

    performance, hoping our seasoned membership will ascribe it to "chacun a son gout".

    First the work :  I firmly believe "ballet" must be able to tell a story (hopefully a timeless and universal story which can

    be readily picked up by anyone on any continent) through dance only, and one would not have to memorise the

    synopsis, go to a couple of pre-performance lectures or "insights", and have to watch the performance looking at

    the castsheet and synopsis every now and then. Mayerling with its particular, non-universal story and plethora of

    characters which do not allow instant identification regarding who-is-who (putting on surtitles identifying who Rudolf

    is dancing with whenever he picks up a new partner would be helpful :D) is a thousand miles away from this. Does

    anyone have to read the synopsis to pick up the story of Giselle, Bayadere, R&J or Don Q ??  Manon in my view is

    less confusing, R&J most suitable for ballet but Lavrovsky got there first and Macmillan's is what we call in marketing

    parlance a "me too" product, period ! I will overlook the similarity of the ensemble scenes and steps between Mayer-

    ling, Manon and R&J  as this could be ascribed to Macmillan's style (Grigarovich has similarities in ensemble scenes).

    This was the first time I saw Watson and thought his characterisation was excellent. However, my companion for the

    evening (a ballet guru) was telling me about the "evil" character of Rudolf but I saw no evil Rudolf on stage. Watson's

    characterisation came across to me as a weak and deluded person who was incapable of sustaining the pressure of

    the rank he was born into, rather than someone bent on doing evil. As such, I found his characterisation excellent.

    Now, my beloved Natasha : this was my third attempt in 2+ years to see her live. I flew over in Jan 15 to see her as

    Kitri and on the night got Tsygankova instead. Last year in Feb I flew in to see her as Giselle and on the night got

    Sarah Lamb. This time I caught Natasha all right but I would rather have seen her as Kitri, Giselle or Juliet. I do not

    think Vetsera will be one of Osipova's signature roles : after the performance I kept thinking would anything have

    changed if Lamb had danced Vetsera and Osipova Larisch ...... I don't think so. When Lamb replaced Osipova last

    year as Giselle I discovered that (esp. in the second act) she is excellent technically, but to me she was not "Giselle"

    in the first act, the way Osipova becomes the character, so the second act was a "spectacle" rather that the "spiritual"

    experience it can be .....  Osipova really shines as Kitri, Giselle, Juliet and even Lise (FMG is not my fav work) but did

    she shine as Vetsera ? (re characterisation, for me it is always characterisation first, excellent technique on top would

    make it unforgettable). As I said, I do not expect this to be one of her signature roles. The Royal Ballet keep casting

    her in silly "contemporary" stuff and are wasting the best years of Natasha's career. Pure commercialism !

     

    So, some members may think I have betrayed my ignorance, poor taste, judgment, in any permutation thereof, but

    I signed up to post what I think, and if I were to take a defensive stance it would be a waste of your time and mine.

     

    PS :  forgot to mention the music : imho totally unmemorable, another minus point. Manon is also a "pastiche" but

    in my view the music is infinitely better. Ballet music really has to be tuneful and memorable.

  12. Was there last night and finally was able to see Osipova in a full ballet.

    By chance sat at same table with Hanna Weibye of Artsdesk at intervals who

    rushed off after the performance to post her review, the only one online so far :

    http://www.theartsdesk.com/dance/mayerling-royal-ballet-review-every-ballet-fan-should-see

     

    I reserve my comments (posted further down) This was Osipova's debut in role, full casting :

    http://www.roh.org.uk/events/p7865

     

    Telegraph has now posted a review :

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/dance/ballet/convincing-vortex-lust-insanity-mayerling-royal-ballet-covent/

     

    Here's a picture gallery :

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dancetabs/sets/72157683126384545

     

    (+) A notable review by Judith Mackrell in Guardian :

    https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2017/may/01/mayerling-review-royal-ballet-royal-opera-house-london

     

  13. First Possohov work I saw was "Francesca da Rimini" which was part of Zaharova's "Amore" gala

    at the Balshoy last May. Must admit I did not know the story, and the program was in Russki only,

    but I could sort of make out the story and looked it up once I got back to my hotel. It is my firmly

    held belief that "ballet" must have a somewhat universal story which viewers can discern and

    relate to - listening to a pre-performance lecture or reading the program notes re what it is about

    will not get me involved emotionally. Does even a child have to be told what Giselle, or Bayadere,

    or Romeo&Juliet is about ??

    This "ballet" I could not relate to, and am glad that I did not spend time and money to go see it live

    - and am hesitant about going to see "Nureyev" in July..

    However ...... Olga Smirnova ...... was so beautiful, wasn't she ??

×
×
  • Create New...