Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

silvermash

Senior Member
  • Posts

    464
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by silvermash

  1. I'm going to raise what might be an unpopular opinion here, and say that this isn't necessarily a bad thing. These contemporary works seem to need dancers who are trained to a very high level in classical techniques, and if we agree about nothing else, we agree that the French school does just that. It would take a significant investment of resources to create a separate, sister institution for contemporary work -- if it's possible to run a kind of conjoined twins company, perhaps that's a solution to the difficulty.

    I was under the impression that the Lyon Opera Ballet functioned as a national contemporary ensemble, but perhaps I'm not understanding their mission.

    My concern is that the POB doesn't seem to tour much at all, which leaves much of France without ready access to their "national" company.

    POB is not a touring company (there is also Paris in the title of the company)... They travel a little though. this year they are doing a visit to Brittany and the past years, they have gone to Grenoble, Montpellier, Biarritz, Créteil.

    I think that behind the idea of certain people to create a contemporary dance group is to focus on the classical group :wink:

    I do believe it’s interesting to have a repertoire of different nature when you have a company of 154 dancers and about 150 shows a year. If all the dancers entering the corps at 18 can believe they can make their way to the top of classical ballet, they’re not going to become all soloists! It’s a good way to diversify your activity, sometimes at the top of a certain repertoire while you are a cygnet or a character artist the rest of the time. It may also be that being a cygnet sometimes, that is practicing classical technique at a very high level, makes you better in contemporary, or at least gives you that particularity (that some don’t like but I do) to be a “special” contemporary dancer because of your classical background. It gives you also some rewards employs people at their best.

    Paris Opera Ballet has an obligation of diversity in its repertoire anyway in its mandate.

  2. The new issue of Dancing Times has a lot of content about Millepied's departure and the present state of French dance more generally. One thing that caught my eye was contained in a short news item about the 2016-17 season:

    "The company acquires three works by George Balanchine: A Midsummer Night's Dream, with new designs by Christian Lacroix, . . ."

    I don't think I've seen this reported anywhere else. I loved his designs for Jewels and Palais de Cristal!

    It's on POB www since the announcement of the season https://www.operadeparis.fr/en/season-16-17/ballet/le-songe-dune-nuit-dete

  3. In fact, Marie Agnès Gillot was one of the first dancers who alerted about the situation. In a December interview in Paris Match (December 5th, 2015), when she was asked about her absence on Paris stage, she said “Je l’ai subie plus que je ne l’ai choisie (rough translation: "I suffered more than I have chosen"

    In 2014-2015 season in Paris she danced in the first bill which was still under Brigitte Lefevre casting. Afterwards, she only danced the McGregor Tree of code in Manchester and New York, but that’s all.

  4. There's a lot I would want to see -- a new work by Crystal Pite absolutely, all that Forsythe and Cunningham (should make a fascinating mixed bill), the Ratmansky Beauty and the Balanchine evenings just to start.

    me too but not in Paris...

  5. I don’t think we have to look deep into what happened. Millepied was not a good manager, he had little projects for the company as a whole and he was not even interested in it. Anger rose, because a big company like that can’t be just ruled with no strong objectives, no strong direction, a lot of improvisations and last minutes decisions


    Perhaps Millepied resigned, but the level of anger among the dancers was too high for him to stay, so I rather believe he was told to leave


  6. Well of course this is just my impression but I think it was the case at the beginning of December but both Garnier and Bastille were pretty full at the end of December. I think French audience at least is back. But Paris Opera has sent a lot of huge discount offers the past weeks for both operas and ballets and most of them are still available. I even received another one for Werther this morning. I think the past years, they used to sell a lot to tour operators and that is maybe the problem cause I've heard the tourist industry is still suffering cancellations.

    However, you can't disregard the fact that the ballet programme is not very exciting this season. I know quite a number of friends who have given up subscriptions this season and are not even coming just for one show...

  7. Well two things perhaps to mention: This double bill was selling poorly which is extremely rare in Opera Garnier always full of tourists so perhaps Millepied thought his show biz fame would fill in with new audience (he had a documentary on him shown on TV in December broadly covered by the press)… Also he surprisingly (with no info, we discovered it on POB website) withdrew from the new Nutcracker so perhaps he’s recycling some already prepared material.

    Yes Benjamin Pech is retiring. He wasn’t dancing much the past years due to permanent injury but from the middle of last year, he’s Millepied personal adviser.

  8. We will see… the idea when it was presented last year by Lissner and Millepied was to reunify Iolanta and Nutcracker as when they were created in 1892 in St Petersburg. The staging of both works is to be done by Dmitri Tcherniakov.

    However, I remember Millepied said it didn't mean it would replace Nureyev Nutcracker, even when he was still involved in the project :D

×
×
  • Create New...