Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

Hans

Moderators
  • Posts

    2,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hans

  1. Leonid, I was commenting on Nureyev's choreography, not the performances. I found the dancing to be excellent but the choreography quite poor.

    I have to say, I do not think ballet necessarily equals pointe work. Pointe is an addition to ballet technique, not a necessary component, unless a work is specifically choreographed to be danced on pointe. Thus, pointe technique must be taught, but it is not necessary for a work to be choreographed for pointe to be considered ballet.

  2. I just watched a DVD of Nureyev's horrible Nutcracker for the Royal Ballet from 1968. It is very similar to his production for the Paris Opéra Ballet, which makes me wonder who decided it was a good idea for him to choreograph after 1968!

  3. 1. The Mariinsky, to see Alla Sizova's entire career and Terekhova's Aurora and Odette/Odile.

    2. Paris Opéra Ballet for Sleeping Beauty (and maybe back to before the Revolution for some Pre-Romantic Classical ballet)

    3. Royal Danish Ballet for all things Bournonville with appropriate casting.

    Also, I agree with Carbro's wishes to return to un-embroidered classics and lower extensions in tutu ballets.

  4. I have been considering a similar issue for some time. Bel canto singers, for example, can gradually retire from Amina, Elvira, and Lucia and start singing Lucrezia and Elisabetta, who are mature, powerful women. Where does a ballerina in her 30's or 40's go? She has to keep dancing the same 'young' roles.

  5. Thank you for this review! It's so pleasant to hear that the performance was such a success. I'm also glad to hear they brought along Maya Dumchenko, but I, too, am puzzled as to why she was in the Act 3 Pas de Trois, as that is usually danced by Vaganova Academy students. (I understand why it was performed by adults here, but why not corps members or soloists?)

  6. I was under the impression that the Royal Ballet School still offered classes in acting and mime, but perhaps not. Or it could have been that the dancers were just marking or that they had just learned the mime. Dowell and Sibley have had a lot of years to practice that scene, so naturally they will do it better than someone who is still learning the gestures. I imagine (and hope) that a lot of work went into that scene beyond the tiny clip that's on YouTube.

    Unfortunately, it is not considered necessary these days to teach dancers how to act, and so they can't.

  7. That does indeed sound like a possibility, and it would certainly be an enormous improvement over ABT's current 'Swan Lake'.

    I do have a question, though--according to your criteria, then, a 'modern reference version' of Swan Lake could have absolutely nothing in common with the Petipa/Ivanov as long as it has been performed regularly and remained unchanged for a long time?

  8. Does anyone happen to know which production is performed on the 1968 video with Yevteyeva as Odette? I just received this DVD today, but it contains precious little information. Yevteyeva is marvelous, though. :)

    I think we may have to come to terms with the idea that no Swan Lake today is really all that similar to the original 1895 production. Perhaps the general choreographic outline is still there as well as some of the steps, but unless someone takes the notations and reconstructs the ballet à la Sleeping Beauty, what we see today is not a reproduction of Petipa's and Ivanov's work. Even the Royal Ballet's production differs in major ways from what is known about the Petipa/Ivanov version, although it is probably the one that adheres most closely to it.

    Edit: I found the answer to my question...in plain sight on the back of the DVD case :wink:. It says 'Screen Adaptation: Konstantin Sergeyev', so now I know who to blame.

  9. I just read in the latest Kennedy Center News that the Washington Ballet will be performing 'La Sylphide' February 11-15 along with 'Celts' by Lila York in a program called 'Highland Fling'. This ought to be interesting; I am looking forward to seeing it. We don't seem to get Bournonville often in DC. I do question the wisdom, though, of following 'La Sylphide' with 'Celts'.

  10. Well, I'm back, and I loved it. This was my first time seeing Graham live, and it is extremely powerful. I expected it to be so, but the energy of the dancers really does hit you like a wall, even when they are merely posing in the background for long periods of time. The only thing I disliked was the surtitles, which I found distracting and annoying. The choreography tells the story very clearly (though it is helpful to read the synopsis) and singers narrate portions of it. More of this at the Kennedy Center, please!

  11. * The article is peppered with reference to "beyond 180-degree penchees" by the students. It seems to be encouraged/ingrained in them. Nonetheless, VBA director Dorofeyeva insists that they teach only the purest classical style, unlike the rest of the world..."We are a bit conservative.". :) One of the 08 grads, Sivlatova, is described as having "...remarkable extension..." capable of holding her leg steady" right next to her ear".....!!!!! Conservative?

    Sounds as if my eyes will not be getting any rest in the near future! This is unfortunate, but it's lovely to read the main points of the article; thank you for putting them here, Natalia. I think I will buy the article.

×
×
  • Create New...