Kirov-Mariinsky Ballet in London
Posted 05 August 2003 - 12:40 PM
When to leave is a controversial topic, too. Some firmly believe one must stay as long as the dancers are on stage, and in the best of all possible worlds -- without trains to catch, say -- I'd agree. But if you have to catch a train, you have to catch a train The dancers can see you leave, though, so it is pretty rude when half the audience stampedes for the exit as soon as the curtain falls. It's also rude, I think, to crawl over people who are enthusiastically clapping, at least for the first couple of curtain calls.
This is a very individual thing, so others will have different views -- I'm sure it varies from country to country and house to house, so that will factor in as well.
Posted 07 August 2003 - 12:10 PM
I hope you don't mind that I start with the 'Contrast'-performance.
I must say I have mixed feelings about the evening of 04th August.
I don't think it was such a good idea to bring 'Serenade' and 'Etudes' into one programme, adding 'Rite of spring' to this was, well euh...a real contrast !
More, we have discussed already several times the problems for dancers to adapt to another 'style'. I can imagine that dancing 'Etudes' after the 'Rite of spring' wasn't easy, apart from the energy-consuming choreography of the 'Rite..' !?
Add to this some technical problems, a lack of rehearsal time and the performance falls to pieces
I found "Serenade" appealing for its playfullness, its pureness and fluent choreography. Well, sometimes this makes me forgiving towards Mr.B. for high-kicking legs ;), but I consider it no more than a finger exercise.
Natalia Sologub was outstanding and I was also happily surprised (again !) by Irina Golub. Korsuntsev and the most charming male-dancer of the Kirov : Viktor Baranov (!) showed more competence in this plotless ballet than I've ever seen before.
Nevertheless, I always remain with some dissatisfaction : one can make another twelve simular choreographies on Tchaikovsky's Serenade ?!
"The Rite of Spring", a meticulous reconstruction by M.Hodson and K.Archer, should have been the crown-piece of the evening.
Shame, but to me it wasn't. I find it hard -knowing about all the efforts the authors took to come to this result- to judge on it. Personally, it was a disappointment : it didn't work for me! Ofcourse it's difficult to put aside other, good performances of the Rite in order to see this one with new eyes !
OK, there were marvellous bits in it. I adored the costumes, the settings, the ritual cadance and the force of the dancers, though they need more time.
The orchestra was breathtaking and made me shiver !
But, at some point I even wouldn't have mind if the blocked curtain stayed down The ballet missed completely his climax at the end, no matter how convincing Yulia Makhalina was in her performance. The most frappant and powerfull picture of the performance for me is Yulia, standing for minutes in the same position, realizing she's the choosen one and no escape is possible.
"Etudes", a real pleasing choreography with simple but effective lighting turned out to be underrehearsed or were the dancers too tired ?
Apart from this I ADORED the leading maledancers : Sarafanov and Fadeyev. Zakharova sparkled in a ballet where she could demonstrate her dazzling technique, but again there remained some imperfection : not the slightest emotion
Posted 07 August 2003 - 12:25 PM
The ending of Sacre was indeed sort of an anticlimax, also because Makhalina fell dead like Basilio in the 3rd Act of Don Q. Otherwise, she made quite a strong impression, if most of all by just standing still.
Just want to add that the high-kicking legs in Serenade are definitely a Mariinsky trademark and you won't see anything like this in other companies. But to my mind the piece suffered most from the sluggish conducting from Mikhail Agrest (faring a lot better in Sacre).
You went to see Bayadčre as well, I believe?
Posted 07 August 2003 - 12:44 PM
Thanks for the info re- high-kicking legs, I apologize towards Balanchine fans !
Posted 10 August 2003 - 02:43 AM
It was also good to have the delightful Irina Zhelonkina as Gulnara, giving a few glimpses of Kirov classicism from a mostly forgotten era: all delicate, feminine charm, swift, and moving without the slightest noise, the last act variation seems tailor-made for her.
The men were interesting all: Shishov as Conrad, Fadeyev as Lankedem, Baimuradov as Birbanto. Only Zelensky, over-cautious, pained a bit. His Ali still had his moments, but we remember what he really could do with the part, and that's all gone now. As something of a local star, he nonetheless got the loudest cheers of all.
The weakest part of the evening was again the 3 odalisques, looking like alien visitors stranded in a Kirov harem, with Sheshina thundering her way through it and Sukhorukova unappealing as ever (compared with a dancer like Zhelonkina, they really seem to come from a different world). Only Selina brought a few moments of grace.
As a gesture of farewell there was a flower throw, even though I felt the company wasn't very concerned about all this. The soloists did several curtain calls, because the public didn't want to let them go. In previous seasons the whole company, or at least the ballet masters used to assemble on the stage for taking a bow. Nothing of that this time. Well, they had an early flight the next morning. Onward to the next engagement. And London will see them back in 2005.
Posted 10 August 2003 - 07:18 AM
"La Bayadere" 02 August 2003
Nikya : Daria Pavlenko
Solor : Andrian Fadeyev
Gamzatti : Elvira Tarasova
Travelling to see the Kirov : it's always exciting ! I had a ticket in my pocket for Kirov's old/new Bayadčre on Saturday 02 August and I was more than happy because Daria Pavlenko had recovered from illness !
Earlier this year I saw Vikarev's reconstruction of "La Bayadčre" for the first time in Paris and I was completely bowled over
So, I saw -months later- a production where almost all the flaws seemed to have vanished.
I had no problems anymore with so-called 'slow parts' in the first acts, costumes were adapted and dancers were no longer struggling with attributes. Even the elephant didn't rush over the stage this time .
Maybe the tiger will come out of the jungle instead of the toyshop till they are touring the USA ?
After her unforgettable "Swan Lake" in Graz, I had high expectations of Pavlenko's performance. And I can't wait to tell she didn't disappoint me this time too !
Her entrance was impressive and what a face !
She was a very determined Bayadčre and the High Brahmin (Vladimir Ponomarev) couldn't influence her.
The first pdd.already set the tone : Solor and Nikiya are in love, no doubt about that.
Pavlenko seems to have a remarkable influence on her partners : I saw Fadeyev like I never saw him before, he was even better this time than in Paris : warmer and emotional ! He was really convincing in his love for Nikiya and the Brahmin was tormented by the idea !
The Second Act brought us an impressive confrontation between Nikiya and Gamzatti (Elvira Tarasova). Tarasova is a firstclass ballerina and actor, her despair was human and plausible and she had no problem in taking us along in her mental development of the character. Pavlenko's strong bodylanguage made the confrontation absolutely stunning.
I felt realy spoiled with the cast : we had Yana Selina, Irina Golub, Svetlana Ivanova and Olesya Novikova as the 4 Bayadčres
Manu's dance was a bit of of let-down...there was absolutely no comparision with the delightful Vaganova-students in Paris.
Ofcourse the "Infernal Dance" with a pure Rakhmanova, powerful Baimuradov and Scherbakov made me forget everything !
Btw -since Graz- Baimuradov is a new favourite of mine , he has style !
Nikiya's melancholic dance of the Bayadčre, her hidden despair, the joy when receiving the basket with flowers : I was totally carried away and -to my surprise- I found myself with my hands on my face, appalled by the betrayal.
In the Third Act Gamzatti is totally convinced in having Solor as her own until the shade of Nikiya appears and Solor seems completely absent. His dream was a delight to the eye : Irina Golub (she became a gem !), Irina Zhelonkina (a marvel !) and the younger Tatiana Tkachenko (she brings something sweet to her dancing). Fadeyev was 'grand' and I adored Pavlenko's balances and little gestures.
I can't find words for the "Kingdom of the Shades", the line-up of 32 shades is a mindblowing perfection. The Orchestra was in superb form and the audience was completely in spell of the performance : the auditorium was as still as a mouse until the very last note.
A tunderous applause afterwards was sending waves of appreciation to the dancers.
As I already said before, I adore the Fourth Act ! No matter how long it makes the performance...
Although this time I was a bit less enthusiastic : 'the Dance of the Lotus Blossoms', executed by children of diverse English balletschools could'nt compete at all with the divine Vaganova School dancers. I can't say they didn't do a good job on the London-stage, you simply can't compare it. But I don't want to be picky here : the audience loved them and there were some extraordinary and charming dancers between them.
The Pas d'action delighted me thanks to Tkachenko and Selina, even Sukhorukova surprised me by being more elegant.
I'm always in awe for the haunting shade of Nikiya who disturbes the dancing of the marrying couple : Daria Pavlenko was mesmerizing and the cold-white spotlight helped her in her commanding interventions.
I had an apocalyptic picture in my head about tunder and lightning, falling collums, stones and whatever made the temple collapse from my Parisian viewing....none of this was happening that evening -well not exactly- but absolutely not in that overwhelming way !?
What happened ? Have they reduced these scenic events or was there a technical problem ?
Nevertheless, the apotheosis was great...the applause immense and one of the first things Daria did was coming forward and send a 'thank you' to the Orchestra : a beautiful gesture !
A pity the organisator offered only 4 performances of 'La Bayadčre', they easily could have another sold-out evening and I already regretted not to be able to see her 'Swan Lake' on the 08th of August
I can't help it, I'm becoming more and more in the spell of the Kirov Ballet, how will I survive next season ?
Posted 11 August 2003 - 12:31 AM
Posted 11 August 2003 - 05:39 AM
Posted 11 August 2003 - 06:16 AM
"Cool purity" yes, that's right. I don't know another Kirov-ballerina who's able to perform the whole scala of emotions, Pavlenko has. If people speak of her coldness, I think they missed all subtleties she can add to a character.
She hasn't the dazzling technique of Vishneva and Zakharova, but I think she's completer as a performer. Sorry it sounds like I start raving :rolleyes:
Well anyway, she has everything I'm looking for in a ballerina !
Posted 11 August 2003 - 08:07 AM
Pavlenko's Swan Lake on Friday had the same qualities of her earlier performance in Graz, except that it didn’t attain the same emotional level as then. Even though it was also Igor Kolb who was her Siegfried, the magic of that earlier performance wasn’t quite repeated. I guess that night was one out of a million.
Posted 14 August 2003 - 02:00 PM
I'm sorry I haven't posted earlier and I'm not going to be able to write a very good review because I've been working very hard long hours this week and it seems like a very long time since I was at the ballet!
But, thinking back, this was the best of matinee ballet. It was cheerful, and the dancers seemed to be really enjoying themselves. (I always like it when they seem to be having fun.) Like La Bayadere, the costumes and effects were excellent.)
I did think that the ballet was quite disjointed in some ways but I just enjoyed watching it. I left the theatre feeling very happy. It was quite comical, and very lovely, when they all waved from the boat at the end!
Posted 14 August 2003 - 02:24 PM
Posted 16 August 2003 - 03:43 AM
Anyway, Alexandra I'd be happy to answer your questions.
I'll talk about the men first. I saw Vladimir Shishov as Conrad, Anton Korsakov as Ali, Mikhail Lobukhim as Lankadem...
All were very lively and I was very impressed with Mikhail Lobukhim as Lankadem throughout the ballet. He was exceptionally energetic and really 'into' his part, being both villainous and charming, and never seeming to stop moving!
The second act was also very exciting. Anton Korsakov as Ali fulfilled my expectations that this was a good ballet for men to do, and he was lovable and did some seriously good jumping! Vladimir Shishov as Conrad proved to be an able romantic partner for Medora, but he did not make such a big impression on me as the other two. I'm not sure why, maybe he just didn't have a very visible personality in this ballet. Actually I'm not sure that in these classical ballets it's very easy for the romantic lead men to stand out when they are so often working as a support to the female leads... Anyway, that's probably something to discuss in another thread. The best guy I've seen in a romantic lead who actually had a visible personality was probably Roberto Bolle or Igor Zelensky. Sorry, back to the topic!
I saw Tatiana Tkachenko as Medora and Elvira Tarasova as Gulnara. When I saw Elvira Tarasova as Gamzatti the previous week I wanted to see her again, in a role where she played a nice person. She was lovely as Gulnara. I think she is technically brilliant, but also quite modest and calm about it. I don't know why her biography is not on the programme!
Tatiana Tkachenko seems like she is quite young, but thoroughly excited by the prospect of taking on new challenging roles such as Medora. What she lacked in stage presence (I think Tarasova has this) she made up for in charm and enthusiasm, and technical ability. She will, IMHO be one to watch for the future because she has 'something' about her.
Like I said in my last post, this was a matinee and the audience were all, like me, looking for some Saturday afternoon escapism and to see something memorable. It was not like an evening performance. The audience did not clap for twenty minutes at the end, but everyone left with a smile on their face, and I think we all thought we had seen something special, even magical, that afternoon.
Wow! I didn't expect to write this much! I hope Ihave answered your questions, Alexandra, and that my reviewing skills are improving!
Anyway, in the autumn I am going to a few Dance Umbrella events at Sadler's Wells: the gala, Ballett Frankfurt, and Michael Clark dance company. I'll let you know what these are like if you like, and chat some more about Kirov too, if there's anything left to talk about!
Posted 16 August 2003 - 04:11 AM
You are quite right about Elvira Tarassova. She has been extremely reliable in soloist roles for more than ten years now, yet was never much publicized. Her performance of Gamzatti in the final Bayadčre was absolutely thrilling and she does have this stage maturity which all these youngsters, no matter how talented, lack. (She does have a "biography" in the program book as far as I can see - nonetheless, these biographies are full of mistakes and omissions, while the silly accompanying photos must date back from their school days... Is this really impossible to get these basic things right?)
I heard favorable echoes about Tatiana Tkachenko in her debut as Medora. Incidentally, she is a pupil of Lubov Kunakova (Kirov aficionados will surely remember her as the wonderful Lilac Fairy in The Sleeping Beauty video with Kolpakova-Berezhnoi). In typical Mariinsky fashion Tkachenko only had a few days to learn the role of Medora.
We will be glad to hear about the future ballet perfomances that you see!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):