"In the Imagination of the Audience"
Posted 08 February 2002 - 12:06 PM
The article is written by the Post's art critic, which made it the more interesting to me, because he's writing about a dancer from an art critic's point of view. One of the things he says is that (I'm paraphrasing and condensing) when you read that so and so "can't be captured on film" or "no film can do them justice" what that means is that the artist's power existed completely in the imagination of the audience.
I thought that was another way of getting at our perennial "is greatnest quantifiable" question, because one way to interpret that comment is that a dancer who has perfect placement or can jump 3 times his height or more pirouettes than anyone on the circuit that year, he or she is "greater" because those accomplishments can be captured on film. Pavlova's "Dying Swan," however, exists simply in the imagination of the audience.
What do you think?
Posted 08 February 2002 - 01:36 PM
Posted 08 February 2002 - 02:46 PM
[ February 08, 2002: Message edited by: alexandra ]
Posted 08 February 2002 - 10:03 PM
[QB]The paint is real, but the effect ....
"The arabesque is real, the leg is not."
About once every ten years, I understand this...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):