rg Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 fyi: i assume this publicity photo, showing Eglevsky as Harlequin, dates from around 1952. Link to comment
carbro Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 Thanks, rg! What an interesting mix of impishness and elegance! Can you identify the photographer? Fehl? Link to comment
richard53dog Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 What an interesting mix of impishness and elegance! Yes, indeed. It IS a beautiful photo. Thanks from me too, rg! Richard Link to comment
rg Posted July 27, 2006 Author Share Posted July 27, 2006 the still has no indication on front or back as to the photographer. i don't think fehl did these sort of studio shots, but i could be wrong. Link to comment
Paul Parish Posted July 27, 2006 Share Posted July 27, 2006 I love the turned-in thighs, their snaky line, playing against the rotated plane of the shoulders and the snaky line the arms are making, with such sensitive hands.... difficult balance,but no difficulty betrayed. It's also a pose that looks sort of Denishawny, forced-arch,bent-knee arched back pose, except that MR B has made it more extreme by making it a one-foot balance and lifting the working knee to extend the height of hte right angle all the way to hip-height.... Link to comment
Recommended Posts