hbl Posted June 20, 2006 Share Posted June 20, 2006 I finally had some time I thought I could devote to helping out with the NYCB web site. I know that a lot of foks here have also been having problems with it. I received the following response to my offer to help: Dear Hal,Thank you for your offer. I am aware of the browser issues. Our current site is eight years old and hence a little creaky. A new site will be launched on July 31 that will resolve all browser problems. Sincerely, Carol Landers Director, Online Media Great news. I look forward to seeing the new site as I am sure many of you do as well. Link to comment
ViolinConcerto Posted June 21, 2006 Share Posted June 21, 2006 Well, it's about time! I emailed Carol soon after the site was first put up (yes, eight years ago) about the browser/scrolling/navigation problems, and she was not very open to comments. They could/should have solved those problems long ago -- any time you create a website the main considerations should be useability on multiple platforms, ease of navigation, clarity of organization and appearance. Here's hopin'. Link to comment
Amanda_K Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 I had to use IE to scroll on NYCB's site. It will be nice to be able to use Firefox. Link to comment
AmandaNYC Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 I agree that the site should have been initially designed to be more usable-- i do research for a web design firm, so i know this first-hand. But, we need to keep in mind that NYCB is still a NFP with budget limitations. I'm guessing it took all this time to get the money allocated for the website. Those allocating the budget should have recognized sooner that a website is a great marketing tool and tool for encouraging loyalty, and so should have funds allocated towards it. But, alas, that's not the way things often go. -amanda Link to comment
ViolinConcerto Posted June 23, 2006 Share Posted June 23, 2006 That's true that they are a non-profit and budget allocations take time, but over the years they have added many things to the website, so there IS some kind of budget. Though I am not an expert, I have studied web design and Information Architecture and know that testing for browser compatibility - on ALL commonly used platforms -- is a very important part of the job. I would think that when the problems were first noticed, NYCB should have gone back to the design firm and had them re-do it to be more browser compatible, because it was unsatisfactory and a poorly done site. They should not have been charged for a re-do of faulty work. Link to comment
Recommended Posts