Grissi Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 according to Francine Du Plessix Gray, when the future Louis XIV was Dauphin he was known in 18th c. France as "Louis le Désiré" <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It was XVII century, not XVIII, that is important, I think. As Louis XIV inherited the throne from his father in 1643. Link to comment
Mel Johnson Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 But he did last into the 18th century, the War of the Spanish Succession being his final miscalculation. Link to comment
rg Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 miscalculation, indeed. o'course louis le desire was dauphin in the 17th (as noted in the correction post) and not 18th c. (as n my miscalculated dating.) i stand corrected. Link to comment
taniusha Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 miscalculation, indeed. o'course louis le desire was dauphin in the 17th (as noted in the correction post) and not 18th c. (as n my miscalculated dating.) i stand corrected. I know for sure ( I read in some encyclopedia) that Louis XIV stopped dancing around 1680. because he became too old and fat for dancing. That is also the time when other people from the Court stopped dancing, following his example, and professional dancers from Academia that he opened some years before became popular. So, it is for sure that he lived in 17. century Anyway, since this is my first post, I just want to say hi to everybody Link to comment
leonid17 Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 [Anyway, since this is my first post, I just want to say hi to everybody Welcome. I for one would like to hear about performances at the National Theatre especially the upcoming Natalya Makarova production of "La Bayadere." Regards Link to comment
taniusha Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Welcome. I for one would like to hear about performances at the National Theatre especially the upcoming Natalya Makarova production of "La Bayadere."Regards Thanks And, I am sorry, I didn't quite understand, which National Theatre is the question about? (National Theatre in Belgrade - where I am from, will not produce "La Bayadere" in the near future, as far as I am informed In the case your question was for me personally ) Link to comment
nysusan Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 In her recent review of NYC Ballet’s Sleeping Beauty on Danceviewtimes, Mary Cargill wrote: “the Bluebird has captured Princess Florine, and is controlling her. The little hand to the ear gestures of Florine show her listening to his commands and following his lead; the choreography should not be just a series of unconnected flutters” This is the first time I’ve heard of a scenario where the Bluebird had captured Princess Florine. Any other thoughts on this interpretation, and where it may have originated? Link to comment
Mel Johnson Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 "Captured" is probably not the best term. The "Bluebird" story goes back to a fairy tale written by one of the "female intellectuals" of the Louis XIV period, and had the princess locked in a tower by her father, and the bluebird is her only companion. In the winter, he flies away, "to China" the story goes, and returns in the spring. When the princess listens carefully to him, she realizes that she can understand his language, and begins to speak to him. One day, she complains about being locked up in the tower, and the bird asks why she can't fly away. She explains that she doesn't know how to fly, but the bird says, "Nothing easier. Since you've listened so carefully to me, you will have no trouble in learning if you continue to listen in that manner." So she learns from the Bluebird, and they both fly off to China together. Link to comment
EricMontreal22 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 I'm sure there are tons of versions of this forgotten fairy tale, but Madame d'Aulnoy's one is the one I think the Imperial Russians would have known best--it has no Florine trying to fly or trips to China--the Bluebird is the prince transformed, as mentioned. A good rundown of the complete fairy tale is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Bird_(fairy_tale) Link to comment
EricMontreal22 Posted February 3, 2009 Share Posted February 3, 2009 BTW the other obscure fairy tale used in the divertissement (besides Hop O' My Thumb which I think is better known, though it's NOT Tom Thumb as some programs say, lol) is the White Cat who dances with Puss N Boots though she's from a seperate story. She's also probably from the Madame d'Aulnoy version (since they seemed to use exclusively the Perrault and d'Aulnoy fairy stories) though there are many versions - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puddocky Link to comment
BeatriceFerrari Posted July 21, 2014 Share Posted July 21, 2014 Princess Florine is trying to learn how to fly. There is that "do as I do" thing (just like Carbro said), but you can't be a bird. You still a princess. So, in my opinion, there are "fluttering arms" but you can't do it all the time. It needs to be very clear that you're not a bird. Link to comment
Recommended Posts