Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Alexandra

Peter Martins

  

  1. 1. Peter Martins

    • Superb. Nobody could do a better job.
      0
    • Very good. He's in an impossible position and he's made the most of it.
      18
    • Adequate. Who else is there?
      11
    • Not good. I don't like the direction in which the company is going.
      12
    • Lousy. The company is losing ground.
      1


Recommended Posts

There's no artistic director here who's been the subject of more discussion than Mr. Martins. I'd like to get the sense of the board on his direction. Often posts are from a few deeply committed or partisan voices, but anonymous polls can give a better sense of what the general perception is.

This poll will be up for two weeks. (But you can only vote once.) Only registered members can vote in polls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ari   

Hmmmm . . . how about: "Good. He's in an impossible position, and while he's handled his responsibilities unevenly, who else is there?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, now, Ari. The last time you voted, was there an option for: "Gosh, I wish Joe had Bob's tax policies or Bob had Joe's brains." The fun, or torture, of polls is that you can only pick from the options offered :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have voted for "Adequate" except for the "Who else is there?" I think many of us know very well who else there is! So I went down a notch in my vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ari and FF are right. For our next director poll, I'll just do Superb, Good, Adequate, Not so good and Awful and let you fill in your own blanks :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just bumping this up for those who may have missed it last week.

I set this poll to expire in 14 days -- which means this coming Sunday night. You can only vote once :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hal   

I think Mr B wanted a choreographer to administer the company and that is why he left it in PM's hands. I gather that Robbins didn't want the job. I think he was wprried that if just a dancer ran the show it would turn into a museum which is exactly what he didn't want to happen. On those grounds I give PM very high marks for keeping the company exciting even after 20 years. My major fault with him is not finding a place for Suzanne Farrell to be with the company in some capacity. So I put him in the second category. But I also can't think of anyone who would have been chosen 20 years ago who would have kept the company as exciting as it is today where it showcases the Balanchine and Robbins repertoire and creates exciting new ballets as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×