Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

Zulma and Moyna. Bring them back!


cubanmiamiboy

Recommended Posts

I couldn't believe that the story, name and weight of these two characters had been completely erased from the MCB production and their dancing extremely simplified. I remember the programmes in Cuba from back in the days where not only the two Willis were always identified by their names, but their story was always included in the notes. The roles were looked after, as Myrtha-wannabes, the dancers would luxuriate in the choreography, the music pace was slowed down and grander and the circumstances of the characters' death was always part of the playbills and clearly exposed in their dancing. I was always told-(without really questioning the veracity of it)-that Zulma had died by committing suicide throwing herself from a cliff, and so that's the nature of her dramatic jumping as if suspended on the air, and Moyna had done so by drowning when trapped in the circular motion of a river rip current, clearly seen in her super curved onstage renversees. It was very dramatic, and the effect was rather beautiful from their dancing.

Zulma and Moyna...you are certainly missed...bow.GIF

Ah..."Giselle", the REAL "Giselle"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree with you, Christian -- I have always loved that pair of variations, and have some performances vividly etched in my memory.These are wonderful performances, and those renversees are truly thrilling -- though they do not erase the renversees of Patty Owen, who danced the role with hte Oakland Ballet twenty years ago with a wonderful amplitude of phrasing, in Freddie Franklin's staging. there's a little bit of a difference in Zulma's variation, in that the assembles were straight-legged, I HTINK.... it was a long time ago, but the suspension in the releve had a more sudden effect after the assemble, if I remember right....

I can't imagine why Miami would want to simplify those variations -- certainly they have dancers who can DO them???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree with you, Christian -- I have always loved that pair of variations, and have some performances vividly etched in my memory.These are wonderful performances, and those renversees are truly thrilling -- though they do not erase the renversees of Patty Owen, who danced the role with hte Oakland Ballet twenty years ago with a wonderful amplitude of phrasing, in Freddie Franklin's staging. there's a little bit of a difference in Zulma's variation, in that the assembles were straight-legged, I HTINK.... it was a long time ago, but the suspension in the releve had a more sudden effect after the assemble, if I remember right....

I can't imagine why Miami would want to simplify those variations -- certainly they have dancers who can DO them???

They certainly can, I would say, but for what I could tell, theirs is a mitch-match of stagings. Zulma and Moyna's variations look like as what the Russians are doing-(for what I see in clips). There's so much that can be done with these two characters...if well staged, one can clearly see that they are the two ladies-in-waiting of Myrtha, and even interfere so their Queen doesn't get to be bothered by Hilarion's beggings...sometimes by placing themselves in between Myrtha and the poor beggar. Yeah, I was disappointed to note how fast those two went by over here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree! I am surprized that they would do this--I remember years ago Amparo Brito was one of the most magnificent Moyna/Zulmas I have ever seen. (I can't keep them straight!)

Ah, cargill...but what didn't Amparito dance to perfection...? wub.png No wonder she was one of the "Three Graces" of Cuban ballet..! Do you remember her in "El rio y el bosque"..? flowers.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

II can't imagine why Miami would want to simplify those variations -- certainly they have dancers who can DO them???

My feeling is that MCB produces a Giselle, along with a few others of its brand-name full-lengths, more because they think that the audience wants them than out of any devotion to that particular kind of ballet. This audience, like many I suppose, is not particularly knowledgeable or demanding as to nuance or ballet history.

Cost is a factor as well, I imagine. Edward Villella is able to do much of the coaching for Balanchine revivals (aided by repetiteurs with whom, in several cases, he actually danced). This saves money. Contracts with the Tharp, Robbins, and Taylor organizations require bringing in professional coaches familiar with those repertoires.

t would be exciting to see what MCB might do with Giselle if they were willing to devote time and expertise to preparing the dancers on the level that they are prepared for other choreographies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know who did the coaching for the diferent roles, but to be fair the company looked excelent onstage. I was looking at them and wondering how many of those very young dancers were dancing that Ballet of ballets for the first time. If taking that into account and the fact that Giselle was done for the last time in MCB 5 years ago, I think they did a very honorable job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I'd rather see the entire Peasant pas de deux deleted than one particle of Act II. Act II is sacrosanct!

Me too.

I love the way the BNC gives weight and significance to the two willis, including the way their music is treated. The way the corps members tilt their heads, in unison, to draw our eye to the entry of each dancer, is marvelous. It's like putting a spotlight on them, without the literal spotlight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...