As a dancer in New York Theatre Ballet's recent production of Tudor ballets, I have been contemplating a question and would love some feedback regarding the matter. NYTB produced this concert not to sell tickets or to appeal to the masses with lots of crowd-pleasing choreography, sets and costumes, but to expose NY audiences to some ballets that are not seen often. The evenings were an homage to Tudor and in celebration of a few ballets he made. Whether they are well-known such as Jardin, or rare like Fandango, or even lost like Les Mains Gauches, audiences were given the opportunity to see the ballets in one evening. They were also exposed to the great legacy Sallie Wilson posseses in preserving the ballets and staging them, almost all from memory, being the Tudor protege that she is. Why is it that with every major or up and coming NY dance critic in the audience, (some coming to more than one perofrmance) that there has been only one printed review? Does it seem like critics are not in support of small ballet companies? Any review, in my opinion, is a good review and can be used for numerous reasons. I feel that small dance companies need the feedback. It seems like only major companies are reported on. Is it political? I am curoius. Anyway, I was honored to be a part of the entire process and feel that preserving the ballets and giving our audiences a chance to glimpse into Mr. Tudor's world is an event that I was proud to be apart of.