Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Tutus


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

#1 su-lian

su-lian

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 14 February 2003 - 08:51 AM

This might be a silly question, but what do you think tutus should be like today? What I mean is that I've been looking quite closely at the tutus while watching Swan Lake by the Deutsche Staatsoper Berlin in the Bart version, and if I am not mistaken, their tutus are made in one piece, and the top ("bustier" in french) seems to be quite light, thin, a bit like a decorated leotard (no offense meant, they look nice). The thing is, I'm more used to see the tutus like at the Paris Opera Ballet which are still made in two pieces and the bustier still has a corset (at least I think, forgive me if I'm wrong) and looks quite thick, heavy and stiffer. The bottom part also looks heavier. Both look very nice, and from a distance, one can't really see the difference, but I think I prefer the heavier ones, they have a certain weight and seem to give more presence (I think I'm probably just being fussy here) although they are more difficult to wear for the dancers, and I am aware of it. So, do you think tutus should be traditional but difficult to wear for the dancers, or should ballet evolve, allow more freedom to the dancers and make them wear lighter tutus?

#2 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 14 February 2003 - 06:28 PM

Not silly at all.

It would depend on the ballet. For the 19th century classics and ballets made in their image ("Symphony in C," "Theme & Variations,"), I definitely prefer the sturdier, traditional costumes. However, in ballets like "Fanfare," (and the "Mistake Waltz" in "The Concert") Robbins has the women dressed in leotard-like tops with tutus. It's a more contemporary look for a more contemporary style, and it works perfectly for what it is.

#3 su-lian

su-lian

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 16 February 2003 - 01:32 PM

Thank you for your opinion! At least now I can more or less see what some other people expect, which is nice!

#4 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,279 posts

Posted 16 February 2003 - 02:04 PM

Interesting question -- I hope Juliet sees this, as she makes tutus and has sewn many dancers into them! I think most people would say that costumes today should be lighter, and older designs adapted to allow as much flexibility as possible. But then we get into the "how high should they be allowed to kick?" discussions, too. Some ellements of technique were tied to costuming.

#5 Hans

Hans

    Sapphire Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,104 posts

Posted 16 February 2003 - 03:15 PM

Actually, I had always learned that the whole point of the two-piece construction was to allow for more flexibility--you can't very well do arabesque in what is essentially a stiff leotard. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that is how regular dresses were made in the 18th/19th centuries as well, with the skirt separate from the bodice. There are also those tutus often used for Le Corsaire that are clearly a modern invention: they are traditional tutus that expose the midriff.

#6 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 16 February 2003 - 06:48 PM

Originally posted by Hans
There are also those tutus often used for Le Corsaire that are clearly a modern invention:  they are traditional tutus that expose the midriff.

Some of us don't like the way those Corsaire- and Bayadere-style, bra-top costumes make so many horizontal cuts across the body's length. They chop the dancer's line.:)

#7 Juliet

Juliet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 721 posts

Posted 18 February 2003 - 03:02 PM

Hi again--snowed in in NYC......

It's really a matter of the ballet and the costume designer.
Hans is correct, in a separate tutu bodice which is attached to the basque of the skirt, the dancer often has more flexibility. Many costumes are made this way--even if they look like just a fitted bodice and a skirt, they are generally two pieces.

The one piece bodice can be fairly structured, too...the tutu is made with a basque of net or twill or something light and very sturdy, but the bodice is joined to the skirt at the hipline (thus, the one-piece look, as the basque is not seen, but anchors the costume at the dancer's waist under the bodice.)

Now, there are leotards with skirts attached (Serenade, for example, or Tchaikovsky Suite #3 for NYCB), but these are not just whacked on there, they are still fitted to the dancers.

I think the nature of a piece largely dictates the costumes (for me at least). I would not to see Raymonda in a plainer tutu--the fabric and structure are important to the whole "feel" of the piece. Contrary to popular opinion, properly fitted and constructed tutus are NOT uncomfortable. If the panties are cut properly, one can do a full range of movement and they will not ride up.

Hope this is useful.....

Juliet

#8 su-lian

su-lian

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 18 February 2003 - 03:24 PM

Thank you very much for all this everyone.
About tutus being uncomfortable, I have heard Paris Opera dancers saying that with Nureyev, the tutus were much heavier and they had to get used to it and their hips really pained at the beginning, so this is why I said they were. It is true that it is one particular type (I suppose), so you are probably right saying they are not uncomfortable. Also, I didn't mean to say the tutus I saw in Swan Lake by Bart in Berlin were decorated leotards with a basque(is it correct? I mean the skirt part) it was just a way to describe how much lighter they seemed compared to the ones in Paris.
Anyway, thank you for giving your opinions.
Su-lian.

#9 Juliet

Juliet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 721 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 01:34 PM

I cannot imagine any Nureyev staging of an opera like Sleeping Beauty or Bayadere with *plain* costumes...I just cannot, cannot imagine it....whew!
These, I have to say, are completely baroque (which is what he and his frequent collaborator, Nicholas Georgiadis, were aiming for....)

A lot of tutus with the bigger skirt take some getting used to--the reconstruction of Kirov's Sleeping Beauty is another example....although the ornamentation on these is not a patch on those aforementioned Georgiadis Sleeping Beauty togs.....

The Berlin Swan Lake may have been one-piece bodices, which look like a leotard, as compared to a two piece. I don't have my video of this at hand to check. although I recall the production overall. Swans are not supposed to have weighty tutus, so this is another difference, if I may be forgiven for pointing out the obvious.;)

#10 carbro

carbro

    Late Board Registrar

  • Rest in Peace
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,361 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 01:57 PM

A friend of mine danced in Canada's Beauty, complained of the costumes' excessive weight, noting that those of a later Nureyev staging of same on another company where SHE had a friend, looked identical and weighed a fraction of the originals.

#11 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,279 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 02:04 PM

Those (much shorter) 19th century dancers must have been strong! Dancing in corsets AND heavy tutus. Not to mention their jewels...... (and in the Renaissance, where ballet steps began, the clothes could weigh as much as 50 pounds).

What I love about the Paris Opera Bayadere tutus is the way they flop and bounce as the dancers dance.

#12 su-lian

su-lian

    Senior Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 147 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 03:08 PM

Thank you once more for all this everybody. I really like the Nureyev style tutus. Juliet, I suppose you wouldn't like to see it, but the swans at the Paris Opera do have quite heavy tutus (this is also partly why I asked the question since it really struck that they were different)!
Su-lian.

#13 Juliet

Juliet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 721 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 05:06 PM

Now that's really interesting!!
I am wondering why swans would have heavy tutus....I know they are not delicate, ethereal creatures, but grace and air also play in the usual design conception of the avian world...
Are they feathered heavily (one thinks of those unfortunate feather knickers from AMP Swan Lake...although I really liked the basic idea and it is just the haunchy-ness of them that I find ugly...looks like the leg on the Thanksgiving turkey....or Jemima Puddleduck's consort from Ashton's Tales of Beatrix Potter.....) Now, THOSE are costumes!!!!!

But, everything is a beauteous thing to someone.
(The image of the Hostess Cupcake tutus from SFB's Paquita spring unerringly to mind.....)

Sorry to get off track.....

#14 nlkflint

nlkflint

    Member

  • Senior Member
  • PipPip
  • 89 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 06:08 PM

I find many times the "two piece" tutus where the bodice and the skirt are not sewn together have a tendancy for the bodice "V' to curl up after a few uses, and it can be distracting when watching the dancer. Sometimes this is very apparant in photos as well. I think the some tacking down in front, even if the two pieces are not sewn together circumfirentially helps the line of the tutu but still allows for some flexibility.

#15 Juliet

Juliet

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 721 posts

Posted 19 February 2003 - 07:04 PM

Yes, of course you are correct--I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that the bodice and basque are separated...
Usually they are joined in a variety of ways, depending on the maker and the dancer's particular requirements. Some are whip-stitched together all the way around, some are joined by elastics inside, and then swing-tacked., others tacked at the front, sides and mid-back...
I *really* hate when a front bottom point on a bodice has not been properly tacked and is jutting out right there to catch your eye in a photo (I know, some of us look at feet, I look at costumes!!);)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):