Give It a Rest!
Posted 07 February 2003 - 06:29 PM
If you were World Commissioner of Ballet and had the power to ban all performances of any ballet with the titles listed above, by any choreographer, for a period of, say, five years, which would it be?
(Of course, we all acknowledge the importance of a continuous performance tradition. But this is spleen talking in this thread. )
Posted 07 February 2003 - 06:35 PM
Seriously, I think there are ballets that need a rest, and when we see them again we'll be ever so grateful. Both for the rest, and to see them again. I have a long hit list, but I'll take the 5th.
Posted 07 February 2003 - 06:59 PM
(And I've even designed one; but I still hate it.)
Posted 07 February 2003 - 07:07 PM
I'd like The Vertiginous Thrill of Exactitude more if I saw it a bit less, too.
Posted 07 February 2003 - 07:12 PM
There is the "Flavor of the Month" problem. Every season, there seem to be four or five companies doing a ballet that has been out of rep for awhile, as though some giant, underground bazaar is havng a sale. This year it's "Rodeo" and "Slaughter" in the regions and "Jewels" in the majors. And the regional companies are beginning to acquire "Jewels" too -- it's becoming the new status raiser, I think, the way "Swan Lake" was in the 1960s and "Sleeping B" was in the 1970s or '80s.
One year at the Kennedy Center, we had seven -- count 'em -- seven companies doing "Swan Lake." One of them did it seven times.
Posted 07 February 2003 - 07:43 PM
Posted 07 February 2003 - 09:26 PM
Posted 08 February 2003 - 08:15 AM
Posted 08 February 2003 - 08:37 AM
Posted 08 February 2003 - 08:44 AM
Posted 08 February 2003 - 03:28 PM
Posted 09 February 2003 - 08:23 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):