Jump to content


This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Quantity vs. Quality


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Poll: Quantity vs. Quality (0 member(s) have cast votes)

Quantity vs. Quality

  1. Lots and lots of new ballets (1 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

  2. A nice solid rep (16 votes [94.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 94.12%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Calliope

Calliope

    Gold Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 805 posts

Posted 23 January 2003 - 07:21 AM

It can be applied to so many aspects, but let's stick to repertory first.

Would you rather see more new ballets, hoping for that diamond in the rough (sorry for the pun)

or would you rather see fewer ballets and have those be well rehearsed, performed, dancers not "thrown in" ....

#2 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,258 posts

Posted 23 January 2003 - 08:21 AM

Great question! (You're good at this, Calliope! You should go to work for Dance Gallup :) )

As I write this, Quality is beating Quantity -- it may well change -- but this surprised me, as when I've posed this question to friends, I've often gotten a response along the lines of, "I don't care how good it is. I wouldn't want to see the same thing every season." And I remember acquaintances back in the 1980s dropping their subscription because ABT opened every season with Kingdom of the Shades. They only would go to opening night, and they were sick of seeing Kingdom of the Shades. (And when it was danced by Makarova, Kirkland, Van Hamel, Gregory, Baryshnikov, Bujones, Bissell -- nice line up.)

But then I remember reading comments by London Ballets Russes fans about how they loved those ballets and hated to see cast changes. "We were like children with a favorite fairy story," I remember reading once. "We wanted to see them every night, and got cross when there was the slightest change." They wanted new works, too -- you can't have season after season without new works or the art form will die -- but the pleasure of seeing perfectly cast, lovingly rehearsed first-rate ballets night after night is one I would like to experience!

#3 Ari

Ari

    Gold Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 887 posts

Posted 23 January 2003 - 09:10 AM

How about a third choice, like, "A carefully tended repertory with several new ballets a season?" That's what I'd vote for. :)

#4 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,258 posts

Posted 23 January 2003 - 09:13 AM

I didn't think Calliope meant a No New Ballets! season.

or would you rather see fewer ballets and have those be well rehearsed, performed, dancers not "thrown in" ....


Since we're imaging the Grand Ballet Sublime, perhaps the new works could also be well cast and rehearsed!

#5 Calliope

Calliope

    Gold Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 805 posts

Posted 23 January 2003 - 09:18 AM

sorry, I did intend for new ballets, just not 15 that you'll never see again!

A "carefully tended repertory", are there any of those left :rolleyes:

#6 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,258 posts

Posted 23 January 2003 - 09:19 AM

Originally posted by Calliope
 

A "carefully tended repertory", are there any of those left :rolleyes:


Oh, yes. Indeed. But they're in a galaxy far, far away :)


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):