Question: Western Symphony
Posted 06 March 2001 - 09:28 AM
When, why, and by whom was it omitted? By Balanchine? I want to know ...
Posted 06 March 2001 - 10:27 AM
Posted 06 March 2001 - 11:06 AM
Accordingly to "Choreography by George Balanchine" the Scherzo was eliminated around 1960. It was restored for a few performances of the Balanchine Festival in 1993 and then dropped again.
I assume Balanchine made the cut himself, there's no real hint in anything I've read as to why, but John Martin of the NY Times in a contemporary review mentioned the Scherzo as the least rewarding part. I assume it was cut because Balanchine felt it made the ballet too long, which also seems odd, as it's the shortest movement and its absence really throws the finale off (forcing the addition of "run-on" principals to dance the finale)
There's a wonderful tape of the ballet shot in the 50's in Paris with Diana Adams and Herbert Bliss, Melissa Hayden and Nicholas Magellanes, Allegra Kent and Robert Barnett, and Tanaquil LeClercq and Jacques D'Amboise that really opened by eyes even more about Allegra Kent. For all her perfume and quirky mystery, she was a jumper and a real allegro dancer. I gather that's also part of Kirkland's mystique.
Leigh Witchel - email@example.com
Personal Page and Dance Writing
Dance as Ever
Posted 06 March 2001 - 01:17 PM
Posted 06 March 2001 - 08:20 PM
Posted 06 March 2001 - 09:43 PM
When they performed it at Costa Mesa in October 1998, the scherzo had disappeared again.
Posted 07 March 2001 - 06:30 AM
The Scherzo is the hardest part of all for a leading ballerina as well as four ensemble girls because they have to jump and jump and jump through the movement. I'm sure it seems more confusing than other movements, but still it's pity Balanchine cut it off. It's worth to see if danced well.
Posted 07 March 2001 - 09:34 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: