Jump to content


Baryshnikov's NYC Think Tank


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#1 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,742 posts

Posted 18 December 2002 - 09:49 PM

Baryshnikov Hatches Grand Plan for a New Arts Center

Wow. I find it a mindboggling proposal. It sounds almost like a
conservatory for already proven masters. There was some interesting talk in the Dec 2 New Yorker about Group Think. I quote Malcolm Gladwell:

We are inclined to think that genuis innovators are loners, that they do not need the social reinforcement the rest of us crave.  But that's not how it works, whether it's televisoin comedy or, for that matter, the more exalted realms of art and politics and ideas.  In his book "The Sociology of Philosphies," Randall Collins finds in all of known history only three major thinkers who appeared on the scene by themselves: the first-century Taoist meta-physician Wang Ch'ung, the fourteenth century Zen mystic Bassui Tokusho, and the fourteenth-century Arabic philosopher Ibn Khaldun.  Everyone else who mattered was part of a movement, a school, a band of followers and disciples and mentors and rivals and friends who saw each other all the time and had long arguments over coffee and slept with one another's spouses."

He goes on to briefly discuss the various masters who have inspired one another, but it would be too much to quote here.

Can trying to artificially structure such a group work just as well as those that come together of their own social accord? It seems like a big exciting gamble, sure to produce something of interest even if it fails it's loftiest ambitions.

I'm dying to be in NYC to see the spinoffs!

After the earlier worries about White Oaks termination, this is even better than preserving history....

Languishing in rural domesticity,
Amy

#2 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 18 December 2002 - 10:01 PM

What a Christmas present!

[quote]"An art center in New York right now is stupid. Insane. Ridiculous. Yeah? Maybe. But I think that's what this city and this country need. In New York City, people used to collaborate and meet and discuss and have fun together and learn from each other. There's no connection anymore, especially with the economic pressures on the arts. And people try to please the media, or a board of directors, in order to succeed. It's all a game. Press agents, fund-raisers, this and that." New York, he added, has become an even more difficult place for young professionals to show their work.[/quote]

[quote is from the Times article Amy posted above]

How can this fail? Even if the finances are rocky and it lives for only a couple of years, it could be an urban Black Mountain College. If you have that many combustible people in the same building, and a welcome mat out for young artists, something has to happen. For just providing affordable studio space in downtown Manhattan the man should get a medal. For providing a climate of inspiration....it will be something to watch :D How much it will affect ballet directly isn't clear from the participants, but it will certainly have an effect on dance and the arts in general. Forward to the Forties!!

#3 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 04:02 AM

Maybe, but where are the classicists? Does Baryshnikov propose to stand up for that himself, besides running the place? The closest people to classical ballet I see on the list of major people involved below The Boss are Jennifer Tipton and Merce Cunningham!

#4 liebs

liebs

    Bronze Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 493 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 05:04 AM

Well, violinist Kremer must certainly know the classical repertoire although like Baryshnikov he is interested in modern works. I think Baryshnikov has really lost interest in the classical but perhaps some of the younger artists he nurtures will hold up the side.

I think this project potentially has a long life, as long as Baryshnikov is interested others will be and ultimately I think they can raise signficant money. Baryshnikov could, of course, continue to provide personal financial support of the project as well.

#5 vrsfanatic

vrsfanatic

    Silver Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 671 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 05:23 AM

This is the way his School of Classical Ballet began back in the 1980's. I hope he is able to raise enough money to fund this project independently so that it is able to survive without his financial input. When Mr. Baryshnikov resigned from ABT the school failed almost immediately (the students were let go 4 months later, and the faculty dismissed) since it had been funded only by him! No more money, no more project! Too bad, they had a good thing going!

#6 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 07:18 AM

I've always thought that Baryshnikov's interest in classical ballet would revive when he stopped dancing and no longer looked at dance as "is that something I can still do." Mel, I don't see Merce Cunningham as a part of classical ballet in any way.

#7 Manhattnik

Manhattnik

    Gold Circle

  • Inactive Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 847 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 07:33 AM

Interesting choice of people for the place. A puppeteer?

I don't see Misha as this generation's Misia Sert, and this project has "Vanity Plate" written all over it. I think the "Broadway" part of the building will long outlast this fuzzily-defined "foyer de la danse" Baryshnikov seems to want.

A lot depends on how the thing actually works once it's built, and who will actually run the place. A gifted director could indeed turn it into something wonderful, but my gut feeling is it won't happen. I'd be very happy to be proven wrong, however.

#8 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,799 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 10:29 AM

Well, one wishes him the best, of course, but as Manhattnik notes, in these matters the devil is in the details. Anything could happen, or nothing could happen.

#9 LMCtech

LMCtech

    Bronze Circle

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 310 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 12:46 PM

Weren't a lot of the same questions raised when White Oak started?

I think this proposal is commendable. Even masters need to expand their horizons to stay relevant. I think this could be very exciting.

As for his adondonment of the classics, I think that is his perogative. He has made it very clear he isn't terribly excited by it anymore. I would very surprised if he ever went back to it. I think he likes to stay on the cutting edge of art (probably why he mentioned the puppetry, which is starting to grab hold i.e. Lion King) and he probably thinks a devotion to the classics won't allow him to be on the edge.

#10 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 03:06 PM

Originally posted by Alexandra
Mel, I don't see Merce Cunningham as a part of classical ballet in any way.


Alexandra, I never said that he was part of classical ballet, I said he was close to it, especially in relation to Forsythe!

#11 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 03:40 PM

I don't think he's close to classical ballet, and I don't think he would either! He's a modern dance choreographer.

Baryshnikov's public statements go back and forth on ballet -- read his introduction to Robert Greskovic's "Ballet 101." (And I'd also say that "ballet" and "the edge" are not, ipso facto, polar opposites.:) ) I think Baryshnikov's very anti-ballet statements -- it's boring, etc etc -- date from the time he began losing his technique. I think he'll become less and less anti-ballet as he becomes more removed from dancing.

#12 Mel Johnson

Mel Johnson

    Diamonds Circle

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,311 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 03:54 PM

I was attempting to express my total lack of regard for the classicism of William Forsythe, unless this venture somehow finds it in him. Excuse me? Irony is difficult to do well.

#13 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,242 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 03:58 PM

That might make an interesting debate :) But for those not conversant with Cunningham, I didn't want there to be confusion. I have heard he loves "Giselle," though, and would often watch performances of it from the wings :)

#14 dirac

dirac

    Diamonds Circle

  • Board Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 24,799 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 04:36 PM

Edwin Denby mentions somewhere a chat he and Cunningham had about Markova -- Cunningham was an admirer, evidently.

It would have been pretty funny if Baryshnikov had sounded off for his introduction to Greskovic's book the way he has elsewhere. "This book is about a really boring art form. If I had been an American, I probably never would have been a ballet dancer. As a matter of fact, if you're browsing in the bookstore, I wouldn't even bother buying this. Don't waste your money!" :)

#15 Amy Reusch

Amy Reusch

    Platinum Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,742 posts

Posted 19 December 2002 - 08:28 PM

Regarding Cunningham's relationship to ballet, I believe of all the moderns (let's round them off at Graham, Limon, Cunningham, Horton &Wigman), his technique is the easiest phsyically for ballet dancers to transition into, what with it's focus on shape & line, it's very similar to say the Balanchine style of 4 Temperaments or Agon.... mindset-wise, Graham is the closest to ballet's extremes of discipline, but physically it's pretty different. Aesthetically, perhaps Limon follows ballet's fascination with curves and suspence/release (sorry for the malaprop, it's late and I've melted my grey cells shooting frogs battling Nutcrackers for several hours today).

It would be great to see more visual arts names mixed in there getting a chance to play. Part of what made the Ballets Russe and Cunningham, for that matter, a phenomenom was their collaboration with visual artists.

I worry perhaps a bit about the "youth" focus, the "mentoring" thing.... I suspect this place would be far more fertile if it were indeed more a "hangout" than a potentially patronizing mentoring type thing... it totally depends on getting the mentors to respect the young people... otherwise, what's the difference between this and any fine arts university? Or maybe I just wish old fogeys would get a chance to play too (or does that become impossible like the "you can never go back home" concept).

What did you all think of Baryshnikov's quote?

Mr. Baryshnikov talked of Rauschenberg's habit of questioning himself every morning. What should he have done already? the artist asked himself. More important, what shouldn't he do? "I wake up with this phrase all the time," Mr. Baryshnikov said. "It puts you into the right frame of mind, because life pushes you to fall into a routine, which is not necessarily healthy. Life is not a series of convenient events, from my point of view.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):