Kirov ballet in Paris
Posted 14 October 2002 - 02:58 AM
There will be three series of performances: a Fokine mixed bill ("The Firebird", "Petrouchka", "Polovstian dances from Prince Igor", "Le Spectre de la Rose" and "Scheherazade"- not exactly a short program... And, silly me, I called too late when everything was sold out so if anybody knows a miracle solution to get tickets at a not too outrageous price, I'm interested ), "The Nutcracker" and "La Bayadère".
Posted 18 October 2002 - 01:45 AM
Posted 18 October 2002 - 03:23 AM
Actually, I could see the opening performance on Oct 16th- I waited near the Chatelet theatre (getting soaked by the rain) and finally a lady had an extra ticket to sell, so I could see it for 15 euros (in the amphitheater, very high but with a not too bad sight). I had noticed some empty seats up there, and wondered why they didn't sell it. It's a pity their phone standard doesn't give the right information (the person I talked to basically told me it wasn't worth going to the theater- fortunately I didn't listen to her advice!)
I'll post some comments about the opening program later, but it was a very enjoyable evening- very long, as it finished at 0:30 AM (having started at 7 PM- it was about 40 minutes late at the end, it's the first time I attend a performance getting so late), but with many beautiful things to see (and to hear- great music!)
Posted 29 October 2002 - 12:49 AM
I've got two more performances to see. Will write more.
Posted 29 October 2002 - 07:30 AM
Posted 30 October 2002 - 12:46 AM
Fadeyev has gained some weights and this sometime affected his movement onstage. He made elegant Solor and showed more technical brilliance than Kolb who danced in the second night.
Kolb displayed extraordinary leaps and smooth rapport with Zakharova. The pair made me feel as if they were real lovers. This hardly happened in Vishneva and Fadeyev's duets. Different from Fadeyev's, Kolb's Solor was rather cool and heroic.
Paris has seen two wonderful Gamzatti from Kirov. Although the overall character of Tarassova was too sweet for the role, her acting was second to none. Ekatarina Osmolkina in the second night was ..woww..a wicked beauty with brilliant technique. Truly a new born star!
I felt strange with some set design. It's that Buddha image in act I. Religiously, the Buddha has nothing to do with Hindu temples where the celebration of fire takes place.. This will be like placing the Holy Jesus in the mosque, I think.
Each interval took ages. I even thought of walking back to my hotel and take a nap. Thanks heaven that in the second performance time was shortened from 3 hrs 55minutes to 3hrs 30min. But it's still long.
Not sure if adding act IV is worthwhile. The climax of the story (definitely not the collapsing of the palace's columns) has passed and act IV is only to lenghten the plot. But if we won't take it seriously, this new LaBayadere is a beautiful production. Three stars!
I also noticed that there were some Kirov fans from London. At least a gentleman whoworks at the Royal Opera House's boxoffice was there.
Posted 30 October 2002 - 03:39 AM
For some reason, castchanges makes me bump into Vishneva time and time again. So, it was for the Kirov's European première of their new Bayadère ! And...as it was with past performances (Manon, Don Q.)...I saw Vishneva dancing Nikiya...and there it ends : no -or to be more kind- an uneven portraying of the character of Nikya Vishneva was no submissive bayadère, she even more looked like a proud princess (not to mention the too elaborated headdress and clothes !) and I found no emotions towards her excellent partner Fadeyev.
Before you all jump onto your horses : I do admire her brilliant technique. This time I was flabbergasted when she turned on her 'turbo' in the dazzling quick bits in the last act. But -to my humble opinion- this makes her more suitable to "Jewels" and other show-off dancing !
Apart from some slow bits in the first acts, some odd costumes, struggles with attributes and silly 'walk-ons', I love this production. I wasn't bored for one minute and the fourth act seems a valuable addition to me : a real climax.
I must mention the orchestra too : five stars for a superb, stirring execution !
And to end : it was such a fine surprise to see the wonderful Vaganova-students, an extra present to a wonderful evening !
Posted 30 October 2002 - 06:32 PM
NO7, how clever of you to pick a hotel so near the Theatre du Chatelet! Last time I saw Sylvie Guillem's Giselle with the Finnish National Ballet there, and I remember several hotels very near the Chatelet.
Originally posted by NO7
Each interval took ages. I even thought of walking back to my hotel and take a nap. Thanks heaven that in the second performance time was shortened from 3 hrs 55minutes to 3hrs 30min.
The length of this Kirov Bayadere was about 3 hours 30 minutes at the New York performance which I saw. I hope that you'll still see the final performance tonight with Sofia Gumerova and Igor Kolb.
Viviane, for your info. the Vaganova students didn't dance in New York, unlike in Paris this time.
Posted 31 October 2002 - 07:42 AM
I was lucky to catch Daria Pavlenko as Nikiya in the third night's Bayadère at the Chatelet. As some well-meaning French balletomane stated after the performance without a hint of irony: "We finally saw a classical ballerina. After always these Vishneva's and Zakharova's I didn't know the Kirov had any..."
Pavlenko's performance was indeed different from all what came before. Finally, here was a dancer whose dancing style was ideally mirroring her portrayal and who understands that by shading her dancing her character develops. A beautiful plastique, clear mime, fine dramatic details, no excesses whatsoever, in short a performance that made perfect sense in a 2002 reconstruction of a 1900 ballet.
Vyacheslav Samodurov made a lively, if not always polished Solor. Tarassova was excellent as Gamzatti. The new/old production has its strong moments (especially the 4th Act) and works better than The Sleeping Beauty in my view, even if I still need to find someone in the company besides Vikharev who seems to share that view
Posted 01 November 2002 - 12:59 AM
I was there to see the third cast as well. Pavlenko made passionate Nikiya but lacked a magnetic personality as an actress. Speaking of her dancing, although displaying a pure classical style, I wish she could have had softer arm movements.
I was a bit disappointed with Samodurov, a sombre Solor. He lost his sense of orientation for a while during executing his big circle in Grand Pas act III. And he landed just an inch away from one of the Shade's tutu. But overall he displayed incredible techniques that neither Kolb nor Fadeyev did.
After seeing the three cast, I think all interpretations are just valid. But still one question arises. What should the true character of Nikiya be? To my understanding, Nikiya is sort of a girl 'stay away from my man, or die'. That's why I like Vishneva's interpretation in particular, despite admiring Zakharova much better. Vishneva's Nikiya wasn't just an innocent girl but dignified and calamitious.
Overall, I enjoyed three performances every minute except the 'danse des fleurs de lotus' in act IV. Would it be a bit out of context of La Bayadre? It's like I was haunted by the Sleeping Beauty and Le Corsaire endlessly.
Posted 01 November 2002 - 06:15 AM
One of the many reasons I loved Pavlenko's portrayal so much when she danced the role in New York was how well she was able to articulate that Nykia is really a Chosen one. There was something deeply spiritual and dignified about her... Because if Nykia is just another vamp (which is the way Vishneva did it, “modulating” a Kitriesque interpretation with a “sad face” now and again), then the “Shades” act, which can and should be danced on a fairly high spiritual plateau, doesn’t really work as well.
Posted 01 November 2002 - 06:23 AM
Re the "Danse des fleurs de lotus", it must have been a treat for you and the Parisian audiences to see the Vaganova students in it.
Posted 03 November 2002 - 04:32 PM
>>One of the many reasons I loved Pavlenko's portrayal so much when she danced the role in New York was how well she was able to articulate that Nykia is really a Chosen one. There was something deeply spiritual and dignified about her... Because if Nykia is just another vamp (which is the way Vishneva did it, “modulating” a Kitriesque interpretation with a “sad face” now and again), then the “Shades” act, which can and should be danced on a fairly high spiritual plateau, doesn’t really work as well.
Cannot agree with you more about the qualities desired for the role of Nikiya! Yes, indeed if a ballerina were rather down-to-earth and failed to bring a deep spirituality to the role (ideally take us to the other world) this ballet would fail altogether. I can well imagine Pavlenko succeeded in this - but then among the current Kirov troop who could bring these qualities best - who could be just rightly described as "Chosen One"; "Spiritual and Dignified"? In my mind it's no doubt Lopatkina. (Perhaps I'm not the only one who was disappointedly put off by her absence for this run - no single London critic dared to cross the chunnel to see the production? I may have overlooked it but have not noticed any review at all here...)
So as far as Kirov's New/Old Bayadere is concerned can I declare (in a whisper) that Paris audience, for that matter New York or even St. P, yet to see the best of them?
Posted 03 November 2002 - 08:23 PM
Posted 04 November 2002 - 01:39 PM
Perhaps I should start campaigning to ask for her early return! Honestly without her the future of classical ballet looks grimmer than ever...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):