SFB at City Center, 10/10/02
Posted 11 October 2002 - 07:25 AM
Most of the girls looked dutiful and in a bit over their heads. Not inspiring at all. Kristin Long had a few nice moments in a ferocious jumping solo, but I still don't see what the fuss is over Yuan Yuan Tan (she didn't do much for me in Etudes last time they were here, either). She's pretty, has a beautiful line, and is dull as watching paint dry. I got the feeling that the upcoming fouettes were weighing on her mind -- she seemed much freer once past them (and she did a creditable job with them), but then again, by that point the ballet's just about over. I did like Katitia Waldo in the pas de trois -- she's got a bit more spunk than most of these bland girls. The two men -- Vadim Solomakha with Tan, and Guennadi Nedviguine in the pas de trois (with Waldo and Vanessa Zahorian, who was tolerable), were beautiful. I loved Nedviguine's beats (we got to see a lot of them as he did a killer solo with a lot of sisonne battus a la seconde in a circle around the stage) and Solomakha's big, easy and soft jumps. The men in this company are sensational, and seem to share a lot of the qualities I loved so much in Helgi's dancing -- grace, calm, clarity -- but the women look, well, flat. It's like a company of Helgis with no Patties.
Julia Adam's Night had some cute and clever moments, but ended up dragging badly by the end. Lots of clever floor work, and work with dancers streched about inside fabric. Rather ikky costumes by Benjamin Pierce (who also, it seems, danced the lead), too reminiscent of the infamous feather pants from Matthew Bourne's Swan Lake. The piece seemed to be a dream of sorts imagined, quite often with wit, by Vanessa Zahorian. I wouldn't run to see it again, but I wouldn't run away from it. Hans van Manen's Solo, to fiesty Bach violin solos has three wonderful and different men skittering about the stage in cascades of witty variations. I've always liked Van Manen's work, and it was nice to see some again, after too many years. There was an intersting contrast between the weighty and sculptural Peter Brandenhoff, the lanky Stephen Legate (with the best surfer haircut the company), and the diminutive Nedviguine, who proved to be a stunningly natural turner, and seemed to be tremendously enjoying himself. As did all the guys, and the audience as well.
Would the same could be said about Rubies, which proved to be even a bigger disappointment than Paquita. Flat, flat, flat. It seemed that many of the choreography's details and fine bits were missing, from both the leads and the corps. The dancers looked to be masking uncertainty under a kind of overly flashy stage brio which their often fuzzy dancing didn't support. I also wondered if the City Center stage was simply too small for Rubies, or that it had been under-rehearsed. It didn't look high-voltage, just busy and cluttered. The leads followed SFB's familiar pattern: Gonzalo Garcia, short and fiesty in a Villella-ish mode, soared through his solos with winning bouyancy and irony, while Kristin Long looked game, but outmatched, and unable to imbue the role with anything more than a bit of soubrettish spunk. Which is not what it's all about. The pallid Muriel Maffre had the line for the Patricia Neary role, but not the strength or authority. I imagine at one time she'd have killed in this role, but not last night.
It was a sad evening -- after Tuesday and Wednesday I thought SFB was clearly in the same league with NYCB and ABT, but after such letdowns with the two "biggies" they brought, it's clear they have a ways yet to go. I do think Helgi can clearly has put together a more-interesting repertory than either Martins or McKenzie (not counting the many Balanchine and Robbins ballets which Martins inherited).
Speaking of which, le toute NYCB was in attendence, and someone should tell Peter Martins that it's rude to take one's seat after the ballet's already started, especially when one is sitting in the very front of the balcony.
Posted 11 October 2002 - 09:55 AM
Very sorry to hear this about the Paquita. Hope it improves by next season. Also sorry to hear that Maffre was off form. It's true she's not as strong as in days gone by, but she can still make everyone sit and stay on command on a good night.
Posted 11 October 2002 - 11:24 AM
I actually decided not to read your post Manhattnik - once I hit the cupcakes part and scanned down to read that you'd seen "Rubies" too. :eek: Here's hoping for better performances to come!
Sunday night I'll come back and read your whole review. ;)
Posted 11 October 2002 - 11:39 AM
Posted 11 October 2002 - 11:57 AM
Posted 11 October 2002 - 02:52 PM
I am, more than ever, sorry to have missed this......
Posted 12 October 2002 - 06:45 AM
thought of Manhattnik's motto: 'Every dance is too long . . .",
not realizing he was also in the audience. However, I loved that
ballet -- such a relief after the heavy, ponderous 'Paquita'.
Unlike M, I would run to see 'Night' again. And I would run even
faster to see any SFB performance with Vanessa Zahorian and
Guennadi Nedviguine. They had wit (GN outstandingly in"Solo")
verve, and an aeronautical lightness that seemed terribly
scarce in "Paquita".
Posted 12 October 2002 - 07:06 PM
also a wonderful clean technique. She is obviously a young dancer with great natural ability and probably in time will grow to be a dancer we all will want to see.
I found the comment "... (she) is as dull as watching paint dry"
to be particularly unkind. I thought we had agreed here to comment as if the performer's mother was within earshot. As a mother I hope I never hear that about my young dancers no matter how untalented they may end up.
When we get to the point that neophytes don't want to read our reviews for fear we will spoil their Sunday afternoon then perhaps we have gone too far.
There comes a time when honest opinion and personal taste flips its pointe shoe over the line in the sand.
We are among friends here so to speak but we still have to be careful what escapes the gates of our teeth.
Posted 12 October 2002 - 07:34 PM
Posted 12 October 2002 - 07:35 PM
I thought she did a beautiful Giselle in 1999? 2000? when she was in Washington. I liked her less in Bugaku the next time around, but still she brought a beautiful delicacy and line to the role.... the Paquita ballerina role is neither of these. Very different.
In any case, this was not written for a published review, it as one person's informal impression *once.* Liking a particular dancer in a particular role on a particular night varies tremendously-----that is the beauty of the artistic experience: it is infinitely variable.
Posted 13 October 2002 - 06:59 AM
And of course, it's perfectly ok to disagree with anyone -- "Dull! That little spitfire?", for example
Posted 13 October 2002 - 10:12 AM
Perhaps M would reveal, here and now, if
he is a little spitfire, a medium-size spitfire,
or a greeeaaat big spitfire -- so that I have
a better chance of overhearing him the next
time we are in the same audience. (His comments
might be more bland if he assumes his remarks
were being overheard by the _father_ of a dancer!
But I dearly hope not.)
Several years ago, M and I were both in the audience
watching Ananashvilli take curtain calls at the Met
when a hefty gentleman, shouting loud 'Bravoi's heaved
large bouguets at her. In the old Ballet newsgroup,
the experienced M enlightened us about ABT bouquet-
I now put a similar query to him: at last Thursday's
SFB performance that is the subject of this thread,
who were those men shouting loud 'Bravos' from
the rear of the Grand Tier at every oipportunity,
deserved or undeserved? Were they local relatives
of the dancers or semi-pros like the man who threw
the bouquets at Ananashvilli? Or, perhaps, minority
Posted 13 October 2002 - 07:58 PM
I remember seeing Yuan Yuan Tan dance the lead in Etudes during SFB's last visit here a few years ago, and my reaction was much the same. She's got a strong technique, beautiful line, and no pizzaz at all. There's a reason why they call this stuff bravura; it's as much about the ballerina's attitude as her technique. You can't be larger than life if you never push your limits, and occasionally throw caution to the winds (or at least look that way). Compare the Kirov video of Olga Chenchikova in Paquita to a performance like Tan's. Chenchikova was sloppy as hell compared to Tan, but you knew she got to wear the fanciest tutu because she was the toughest and most fearless kid on the block. Tan gets to wear hers because she looks pretty.
I also saw the program with Chi-Lin, and I never quite know what to make of such modern-day ethnic pastiches. I always cringe at the beginning of Bugaku, but get swept away in the genius of cold and erotic duet. (I'll bet Tan would be great in Bugaku -- she has the sang froid for it.) Chi-Lin was just an embarassingly kitschy bit of Chinoiserie, particularly disappointing after Tomasson's beautiful and clever Chaconne for Piano and Two Dancers, for the sensationaly sprightly Kristin Long and the godlike Yuri Possokhov (has he ever danced Apollo, I wonder?). But I'm digressing. Watching Chi-Lin (and knowing I'd be seeing Turandot at the Met the next night [Andrea Gruber isn't quite the fat lady Jane Eaglen is, but you certainly know when she's singing!]), I wondered about the rights and wrongs of an artist attempting to play with the styles and fragrance of another culture's art forms. Think what you will of Robbins' Watermill (which I love) or Bugaku (which I also love), they're at least attempts get a bit beyond the surface of another culture's art forms (although it's interesting that each uses a veneer of Orientalia as a smokescreen for some rather fierce erotica). Chi-Lin just seemed vapid, with a few hand gestures and the like grafted onto ferociously ordinary, thouch certainly pretty, choreography, and I kept on imagining I was hearing echos from that more forthright bit of kitsch playing a few blocks away -- "you travel there IN a TROLLEY, IN a TROLLEY all the way...."
Ed, I was sitting upstairs in the cheap seats, so I don't recall any mad bravoers. Honestly, by the middle of Rubies I was just thinking about the exits. And a gentleman doesn't spit, he expectorates.
Posted 14 October 2002 - 07:45 AM
Chenchikova is not "sloppy as hell compared to" ANYBODY.
Much as I hate to disappoint you all, the reference to "spitfires" was not originally directed at Manhattnik. I know, I know, it's a disappointment......in M's case it is more like a long, controlled rumble of thunder on the horizon and then, KABOOM!!!!
Well, I guess I will have to wait til SFB gets down to KenCen later this year to see what we see and I am not going to be too discouraged any longer about missing "Paquita."
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):