European dancers Vs American Dancers
Posted 09 September 2002 - 07:31 AM
Posted 09 September 2002 - 07:38 AM
Posted 09 September 2002 - 07:41 AM
Posted 09 September 2002 - 08:03 AM
Posted 09 September 2002 - 08:08 AM
(Xena, I can't resist mentioning that the Kronstam biography deals with his career as a dancer, of course, but also a lot with teaching, coaching and staging of ballets )
Posted 09 September 2002 - 09:29 AM
I didn't mean it specifically in regard to these teachers - although I did meet Madame Darvash and she certainly had her strong opinions! I do realize that the general feelings today are that there is a terrible dearth of the 99,999 other things a ballet dancer needs to learn, besides "the correct" technique, and I look forward to reading the book in order to learn how these particular 10 have dealt with this.
I also think that it will be quite interesting to take a look back in about 15 years and see what people are saying about today's ballet dancers then - will they be held up as icons, or will we have a resurgence in great training form the earliest days of a young dancer? All of which, puts me in mind of another thread in which the training of young dancers at CPYB is being discussed. Many extol the virtues of both the quantity and the quality of the training available at CPYB and yet, I have also read that some consider their dancer's to be "all about technique". I guess this just brings us back full circle to Giannina's observations!
Posted 09 September 2002 - 09:36 AM
Fifteen years ago, 25 years ago, there was a complaint about the young stars of the day being all technique and no nuance, too, and I think those judgments have held up pretty well. They either still stand -- a Fernando Bujones, say; exemplary technique, but that's it -- or the dancer is seldom mentioned. Danilo Radojevic comes to mind
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users