A Sociology Paper on Ballet
Posted 23 July 2002 - 04:11 PM
It's quite long, but for those who read it, I think presents many topics of conversation. Most importantly, it looks at ballet from a very negative point of view that I think needs to be addressed, simply because it's out there and persists.
What do others think?
Posted 23 July 2002 - 05:10 PM
My first impressions are that it is extremely negative and that the majority of footnoted claims are from tracts that are from about 30 years ago. We all know that there have been many unseemly things that have gone on in the ballet world but some of these supposed facts just don't seem plausible to me... the weigh ins at ABT?
That being said, I have to believe that there have been some great strides made towards improving the health and welfare of dancers in the ballet world...otherwise it is time to fold up the tents and go home.
Maybe we should take specific "facts" the author of the paper expounds upon and do a little dissection? Much of her information seems quite dated to me. Let us hope so.
Posted 25 July 2002 - 05:18 AM
Hurrah for 'collective bargaining'.
Posted 25 July 2002 - 05:35 AM
This line made me think the girl has never been to a ballet
"However, all of ballet looks the same with cookie-cut out dancers expressing themselves in the same ways to the same music. "
Which in my eyes immediately discredits her
I don't know what's worse though, the fact that she took all of this as "fact" or that she got an A on the paper.
Posted 25 July 2002 - 06:38 AM
Posted 25 July 2002 - 06:45 AM
and let's never underestimate the pervasiveness of grade inflation. an A nowadays is an average grade.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the article, but rg's comment about an A being an average grade reminds me of a story from my college days that's too good to waste.
Lenice, a young woman with all Bs and As (this was way before grade inflation), dared to take Dudley Sherwood's third year classical Greek class. She was the only student. She was a legend; she was only a junior, but had taken a Greek seminar the preceding summer at Georgetown, with their seniors, and gotten a B-plus.
Mr. Sherwood gave her a C.
She was a bit stunned, since her test papers had reflected no detected errors and went to Mr. Sherwood, expecting to be told it was an error. "But Lenice," he said. "You were the only student in the class. Ergo, you must get a C, as a C means average."
Back to Leigh's article, which I've only skimmed, I think it's horrendous that something like that would be accepted . much less given an A, but the only ballet story that the American "intelligentsia" (and I lose the term loosely to refer to many in academia, where modern dance, oldstyle, still dominates) wants to hear is that ballet is bad, it kills people, it's too selective, it won't let in short little fat people with bow legs and is, as Mr. Sherwood would say, ergo bad.
Posted 25 July 2002 - 10:20 AM
Posted 25 July 2002 - 11:12 AM
professional dancers are not attending college and in some cases are even dropping out of high school (Gordon, 1983).
I don't think this is the case anymore, I think now, far more than before has actually been reversed.
It is not uncommon for a dancer to walk into what she thinks will be her daily ballet class and find a scale set up in the center of the dance studio instead (Gordon 1983
again, maybe it happened in 83....
The whole section on anorexia and diagnosis.
Yes below 15% below body weight is considered to be a factor in determining anorexia (and amenorrhea is associated with both low weight, stress and/or over exercising) but that does not constitute every dancer as being anorexic simply because they have low body weight. Some people's metabolism is different. And yes, it is a problem in ballet, but this paper implies all dancers are anorexic.
Management wants all of its dancers to look alike onstage, and it believes that audiences might find it distracting or hard to believe if a black dancer were to play a white snowflake in a sea of other white snowflakes danced by white dancers
I think that's an absurd statement with no "fact" to back it up.
I think if she had stuck to the subculture theme of the paper, from a sociological perspective, she might have come away a bit better.
The whole Rational Choice Theory, doesn't really apply, at least how she describes "the behavior is influenced by the rewards and costs that people anticipate for a given action". I think it's called work ethic.
And now, I'm too tired to continue. anyone else?
Posted 25 July 2002 - 11:21 AM
On the dancers attending college, to take just one point, there are now several universities offering majors in ballet -- not the case until recently. And colleges around major dance companies (Fordham in New York is one of the best examples) offer accommodations to dancers. Companies are also more aware of retraining responsibilities now than in the past.
One could write a really zippy attack on ballet -- no overtime! no health insurance!! no job security!!! -- based on memoires from the Ballets Russes dancers of the 1930s and 1940s.
In my skim, what I saw were a lot of suppositions and examples of "conventional wisdom" (the scales in the dance class, for example) that keep being perpetuated in the media, as well, apparently, in high schools.
Posted 25 July 2002 - 11:33 AM
I wonder if she knows that ABT broke out of AGMA recently?
And don't get me started about the campaign to fix underweight ballet dancers. And to use the film "Center Stage" as any kind of a reference on ballet, ugh.
Sorry, it makes me want to not send my kids to school at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Posted 25 July 2002 - 11:34 AM
Posted 25 July 2002 - 11:42 AM
Posted 25 July 2002 - 02:01 PM
says that “it’s not easy to partner very thin dancers…they scream out all of a sudden because you pick them up…it makes you very tentative about how you touch them” (Gordon, 1983, p. 151)."
It's also really hard to partner when you're high on cocaine...
I have always despised "arguments" where the author states what they want to state and then tags on a footnote or reference. You can't go look at each reference for every sentence and so the argument reads as though it is logical and based solidly on fact, when it is not.
Definitely not an A paper.
Posted 26 July 2002 - 07:13 AM
For all I know, she may have simply made a precis of Gordon (1983) with adversion to a few additional sources so that this was not so nakedly obvious.
Posted 26 July 2002 - 07:25 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users
Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases: