Jump to content


Vienna: Lusthaus (revisited)


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 glebb

glebb

    Gold Circle

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 807 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 04:21 AM

In addition to the thrill of sitting next to and chatting with Peter Martins, I enjoyed a performance of Martha Clarke's VIENNA: LUSTHAUS (revisited), last night at New York Theatre Workshop on 4th street between 2nd and 3rd Avenue.

The program notes say: VIENNA; LUSTHAUSE (revisited), like a dream, explores the unconscious world of Vienna at the beginning of the twentieth century -- in music and movement and texts -- fragments of a lost, shattered world, taken from the paintings of Egon Schiele and Gustav Klimt, from casebooks of Sigmund Freud, frm the dreams of his patients, from letters and journals and diaries: the unconscious world from which our tormented, waking world springs eternally.

I found this one hour and ten minute performance visually stunning. Not always light and pretty, it was still like a beautiful dream

The programs lists:
Concept and Direction Martha Clarke
Music Richard Peaslee
Text Charles L. Mee
Scenic and Costume Design Robert Israel
Lighting Design Paul Gallo
Music Direction Jill Jaffe
Production Stage Management Jennifer Rae Moore
Assistant Stage Management Greg Tito

Cast:
Vivienne Benesch, Erica Berg, Elzbieta Czyzewska, George De La Pena, Philip Gardner, Richmond Hoxie, Mark Nelson, Jimena Paz, Andrew Robinson, Paola Styron, Julia Wilkins

Musicians:
Jill Jaffe - violin, Daniel Barrett - cello, Steven Silverstein - woodwinds, Stewart Schuele - french horn, Nina Kellman - harp

The program notes that VIENNA: LUSTHAUS was first performed in 1986. Have any Ballet Alert posters seen the original or recent production of this piece?

#2 Alexandra

Alexandra

    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,248 posts

Posted 29 June 2002 - 07:37 AM

I saw this when it was new, Glebb. It was billed as theater rather than dance (and reviewed by theater critics) and was considered, by theater people, as something revolutionary. I remember dance people seeing and saying, "Well, we've been doing this for about 20 years!"

That said, I do remember some stunning images (especially the nude ones :D ) I think your comparison to a dream is a good one -- and like a dream, I only retain impressions.

Martha Clark was going to be our Pina Bausch and that didn't quite happen. I wonder what she's doing now?


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases (adblockers may block display):