Marilia Tsoukia

Vladimir Malakhov

81 posts in this topic

Hello!!!! My favorite dancer is Vladimir Malakhov. He is so great, he has a great body, he is kind of handsome and the most important is that he is a principal with American Ballet Theatre and a guest principal with Vienna State Opera Ballet. I have heard many balletonames saying that he is the Nureyev of our years!!!! Does this really stand? What is your opinion on that?:)

Share this post


Link to post

Unfortunately, I haven't seen him often enough to judge. Only Romeo (MacMillan's, with ABT, which I much admired) and a few videos. I think he's a very different type of dancer than Nureyev, but I think he was a very fine one and someone I wish I could see more often. He has danced with so many companies, and so many different roles (but only a few times each role) that I don't really have an idea of what kind of dancer he is.

Thank you for the question. I hope others who've seen Malakhov dance more often will be able to give a better picture.

Share this post


Link to post

I also have only seen Malakhov a few times, but those few times made a huge impression. However, I think the comparison with Nureyev is inappropriate. Nureyev had an impact and influence that spread far beyond the dance world to say nothing of his enormous impact and influence inside the dance world. I don't think Malakhov as a "phenomenon" is remotely comparable. Nureyev danced during a very different time with very different standards. Today at ABT, for example, the other male dancers include several (at least four or five) genuinely sensational virtuousi who are gifted and imaginative artists as well. Malakhov is my favorite (of which more, below), but in this context he does not stand out quite the way Nureyev did when he first defected to the west and started dancing with the Royal.

Having said that -- Malakhov is my favorite for a reason, and I think a case can be made that he is, taken altogether, the finest male ballet dancer of our time. People who refer to him as the "Nuryevev of our years" probably mean no more than that. The qualities I appreciate about Malakhov include his remarkable line -- the wonderfully full, sustained, 'stretched' quality of his movements -- and his striking stage presence. He is (in my opinion) one of the few male dancers today who know how to run across a stage or, indeed, how to walk or even stand in such a way as to command the stage entirely. His performances in the nineteenth-century repertory also show great attention to dramatic as well as dance detail. Even in an absurd, secondary role -- the expanded "Rothbart" of Mckenzie's Swan Lake -- he manages to create an entire world. His best performances are always 'complete;' I don't really know how else to put it. There is a quality of imagination that expresses itself directly in a very pure, elegant-yet-intense balletic style. (He actually reminds me more of Anthony Dowell than Nureyev -- but all great dancers are sui generis.)

I have not found him to be %100 consistent, and I suspect that his virtuoso technique is not as strong as it once was. Still, in trying to think of someone else I admire as much, who is still dancing today, I can really only come up with one name, Peter Boal, and Boal's repertory is entirely different. However, there are top European male dancers I have seen little or not at all...

Share this post


Link to post

I agree in the fact that he cannot be compared with Nureyev because we are talking about two different dancers in different times. I strongly believe though, that he is- if not the best- one of the best male dancers in the world. He is so passionate and possesses and uses the technique such as no one else does. I went to mariinsky.com and saw some pictures from the 2nd Mariinsky Festival. Among many performances, Malakhov danced 'Manon' with Zhanna Ayupova. When I saw the photos of that performance I stood in awe by the expression on his face. I maybe very melodramatic or exaggerating but I suggest you go and see these photos and you'll remember me. He also danced one of Fokine's ballet with Ayupova again. Thank you for all your replies. I hope I get more.

Share this post


Link to post

I've only seen Malakhov live ONCE, but I'll never forget it -- he was dancing young Adam in "The Creation of the World," with he Moscow Classical BAllet, they came through San Francisco in , oh, 1990 or so--

I had never seen a male dancer who looked so beautiful.... Nureyev was androgynous, and, in a way, Malakhov resembles him -- the same coloring, high cheekbones, large eyes, beautiful ribs, clear center, beautiful hip-bones -- but Malakhov has much longer and more beautiful legs, and the most beautiful feet I've ever seen on a guy.... he is really more refined, more elegant, both in hte body GOd gave him and in the way he uses it -- though he's still young, Nureyev, GOd grant him rest, trashed his instrument and kept on stumbling around out there.... well, let's not go there....

Creation of the world is a character ballet, and Adam is as much acting -- Malakhov was wonderfully naif, like a boyish Bambi -- as it is dancing, and he was a wonderfully imaginative actor. SO I can't compare him with someone I've seen do Swan Lake or Giselle or Dances at a Gathering -- though I'd sure like to see him DO Dances at a Gathering, and Apollo.... I do know he made me want to see him in anything

When he did grand jete, the grand battement was so long , so light, and it involved lifting and OFFERING the foot so sensitively -- but with plenty of power, it was not languid dancing, not a t all -, his front leg flew up so lightly, his torso rode the wave, and his back leg stretched out behind and followed hte curve of hte jump -- I'd never seen such a clear "up and over" leap before....

Share this post


Link to post

I've only seen Malakhov a few times, and always in acting roles (Romeo, Albrecht, etc.) I can't begin to better Paul's wonderful description of him. He's a dancer who intrigues me and whom I wish I could see more often.

Last week he danced the first movement in Symphony in C (with Paloma Herrera) and I thought he was marvelous. He *is* like a long legged Nureyev -- they have the same way of pouncing into a step -- but he can remain a part of the ensemble. He was one of eight principals, but not a STAR here, and I liked him very much for that.

The dancing itself was very clean, very elegant and very sophisticated -- and joyous. He's not well-matched with Herrera (though this is one of her best roles). He's too small for her and they just don't seem a match made in Ballet Heaven. But he partnered her beautifully.

A surprise performance, but one I'm glad I saw. Wish he was doing Oberon in Dream!

Share this post


Link to post

A few years ago Malakhov seemed to be paired consistently with Amanda McKerrow. I was struck at the time with how well-matched they seemed to be on many levels. McKerrow is a beautiful and refined classical stylist herself, although her performances have often seemed a bit on the wan side, physically. Their acting together in Giselle or Coppelia was among the best-realized I've seen. When Malakhov's Albrecht kissed Bathilde's hand, McKerrow was standing center stage, upstage of the pair, and as Malakhov slowly, slowly, lowered his lips to Bathilde's hand, he turned his head to watch McKerrow's Giselle as he did so. This wasn't just a key moment in the narrative; it became a key Moment of the entire ballet. It was clear this Albrecht knew he was about to destroy this Giselle, and felt helpless to prevent it (McKerrow, needless to say, fell to pieces quite satisfactorily).

I don't remember if he's dancing with McKerrow at all this season, but they're well worth catching together.

A dance teacher of mine likes to remember the happy surprise she had one day discovering Malakhov in her class, and described him to me as a cross between Nureyev and Anthony Dowell. Although this sounded like hyperbole at the time (and lots of it!), she really wasn't so far over the top. He has Dowell's refinement and singing line in arabesque, as well as more then a dash of Nureyev's brilliance and power. It makes me sad that he seems lately to be cast more in second or third banana roles (I mean, Lankehndam?). It does also seem that his technique is not what it once was, but he's still as refined and graceful as ever.

While he's certainly not the only classy man at ABT (Marcelo Gomes exudes class, for instance), he's certainly the classiest, for reasons Alexandra has already mentioned.

And thanks for the beautiful description, Paul. That really does catch him to a T.

Share this post


Link to post

I recently obtained a copy of ABT's 'Le Corsaire' on videotape and was surprised at how ABT could cast such a brilliant, exquisitely refined dancer as Malakhov in the role of the slave trander Lankendem.

As my mother and I watched the ballet, we agreed that while Corella and Stiefel may jump higher and turn more than Malakhov, one can see the amount of strength that they put forth into each of their virtuostic movements. With Malakhov's dancing, there is a floating, stretched quality that masks all of the physical exertion (or lack thereof) that he goes through.

I know that the different roles that these men have in 'Le Corsaire' will affect how strenuous it can be, but I'm still convinced that for Malakhov, dancing is a piece of cake.

So to prove my point, I also took a look at a video made in Soviet-era Russia called '30 Variations'. It was thirty variations danced by various principals/soloists, and a very young Malakhov was among them. Even at such an early age, he had the most beautiful suspended lines out of all those in the static-laced video. One could not find an ounce of a tense, strained look in his face or in his dancing. It completely knocked me away when he proceeded, in one of the variations, to do some entrechat-sixes, and I looked around the screen desperately for wires carrying him over the ground. I couldn't, and to this day I am still wondering how he dances like he does. :)

--Luka

Share this post


Link to post

Unfortunately, Malakhov and McKerrow are not dancing Giselle together this season. I agree with Manhatnick--the moment when Malakhov bent down to kiss Bathilde's hand was one of the most vivid theatrical moments I can remember. Their Giselles to me will be my model of how individual and moving that story can be. And in the second act, he just seemed to be so tightly wound, just begging for one last chance to see her and explain. I get choked up just thinking about him. I do like him as the slave owner, though. He is the only one I have seen who can dance it expressivley, who can make is solo say something and not just look difficult. Watching him go down into those deep plies and then spring up again just seemed to sum up his character so perfectly.

Share this post


Link to post

Watching him go down into those deep plies and then spring up again just seemed to sum up his character so perfectly.

My knee-joints would always pop in sympathy. They're aching now just thinking about it.

Part of the thrill is that Malakhov makes it all look so easy, springing up into that soutenu like it was nothing at all!

Sometimes when I'm in a flippant mood I wonder if Bournonville (or was it Beck) was so fond of tossing in similar steps to keep the young whippersnappers at bay -- "Heh. You think you're hot stuff? You get the solo with the grande plies. Let's see how cocky you you are after your knees blow out!"

Share this post


Link to post

Manhattnik, I think that was one of the steps that 19th century dancers tossed off all the time! There was one of Bournonville's men -- I can't remember who, but it was in the 1850s or '60s, Middle Bournonville -- who had something terrible happen to his kneecap . It's in Theatre Life -- Mr. B I had never heard of that injury. I have no idea if it's related, but....

Malakhov also puts those deep plies into La Sylphide, I've been told -- I've never seen it. So did Peter Schaufuss, but so did Poul Gnatt, the James of the late 1940s and early 1950s. I can't date them before that, but the second solo in Napoli II (Beck, as you pointed out) uses them and about 100 years ago now.

Share this post


Link to post

Hello!!! I read at malakhov.com that Vladimir was appointed artistic director of Staatsopern Ballet (I don't know if I have spelt it correctly). That is very good but does it mean that he will leave ABT or he will retire from dancing in general? Does he want to ensure his future by asssuming this position because he is going to retire? In his letter at this ballet's website, he was mentioning that he will also dance in certain pieces. I don't know. If he 's going to retire I will just die... What, he is only 34!!!!! If you have any news please do tell me. Bye!!!!

Share this post


Link to post

I can't be of much help, I'm afraid -- I hope someone else will know more. Malakov's appointment was announced several months ago -- very quietly. It doesn't necessarily mean he will stop dancing :)

Share this post


Link to post

On the website of Berlin State Opera it says that Malakhov is appointed as Artistic Director and Principal Dancer. Also, in the interview he gave during last Mariinsky festival, he said that he will continue dancing, mainly in Berlin, with ABT, and at the Vienna State Opera, but not with Stuttgart Ballet. He also mentioned Tokyo Ballet where, I guess, he is a Principal Guest. I am sure he will and I hope he will continue dancing. He is 34, but I can be wrong here, but were not Nureyev and Baryshnikov about the same age when they started directing? And kept on dancing.

Share this post


Link to post

Katja, I think you can count on any dancer of Malakhov's calibre dancing as long as he is able :) Baryshnikov did dance while he was director of ABT, and, as I'm sure you know, Nureyev never stopped :) I think he was considerably older than 34 when he took on Paris Opera, but he'd been staging ballets from the time he was in his mid-twenties.

Share this post


Link to post

As far as I know Vladimir is not going to quit dancing. In September he'll be performing Albrecht in Berlin Staatsoper "Giselle" partnering Diana Vishneva as a guest-star. In December he is planning to mount his version of "La Bayadere" and dance Solor.

I'd also like to contribute to the admirers of this uniquely gifted dancer with some traces of his career in Russia. It is common knowledge all over the world that Malakhov is a " True Prince" (there exist a well-made documentary of this title). But Vladimir has also a talent of a comic actor which he manifested in Russia more than once before leaving for the West. For the first time he revealed these qualities in a composition based on Mayakovsky's play "The Bug". It was choreographed for ballet competition in Moscow and was a big success. Then especially for him the role of Gamash in Don Quichote was newly choreographed. Alas my English is rather poor to describe how mockingly touching he was as an unlucky fiancee' - with ribbons in his long curly hair (at that time) and shoes, moving on the stage like a grasshopper and jumping like a balloon. This ballet was shot for TV, but unfortunately never released as a commercial video. He was a wonderful playful Adam in "Creation of the World" (this role was first made for Baryshnikov) and … a cheeky Carmen in a special New Year TV-program. He did not loose his sense of humor since then, and can even appear on special occasions on points (wonderful technique!) as he did for example in Japan in a parody on Sylvie Guillem (female variation from Auber's Grand Pas Classique). Ms. Guillem kissed him after that and said he was "naughty boy" (with strong French accent which Vladimir perfectly imitates). I must stress that his grotesque roles are never vulgar, but refined, like Toulouse-Lautrec's posters.

Share this post


Link to post

Thank you for that, Ina -- and welcome. I note that this is your first post! Your Engliish is splendid, and I hope we'll be reading more from you in the future!

I've been surprised there haven't been more comments on Malakhov. I think it's because he simply doesn't dance here enough. He's always in ABT's spring season at the Met, but doesn't go on the company's tours, and he doesn't seem to get as much attention as the wunderkinds. I agree that he is a fine artist. I wish I could see more of him.

Share this post


Link to post

I deleted a post on this thread and notified the poster by email. So, dear poster, please check your email :)

A reminder: when writing about a dancer, don't get too personal. It's a good idea to remember that anything you write may be read by the dancer, or his mother. Be honest, but pretend you're in a living room :)

Share this post


Link to post

Vladimir Malakhov and Dianan Vishneva are touring Israel at the end of August and beginning of September (and hopefully won't cancel.:eek: ). The Hebrew ad. placed in the newspapers terms these performances 'International Festival of Classical Ballet' and the names mentioned are Malakhov, Vishneva (who is described as Prima Ballerina of Covent Garden:confused: ), Farukh Ruzimatov, Julia Makhalina, Irina Surneva and Gedminas Taranda. There are 2 programs: one is a full length Giselle and the other is a mixed bill with Sheherzade, Paquita, Bolero and 2 other ballets that I don't know how to transliterate (Hebrew has dots and accent-like characters for vowels and not letters, and the vowels are usually left out in newpapers, adult books, etc.). The ad. states that Valdimir Malakhov's company will be performing together with the 'stars'. Does anyone have any info on these performances ? Do you know what company this is? It sounds very promising:)

Share this post


Link to post

Hi,

I've danced last seison with Malakhov in Stuttgart. I did Kameliendame and Romeo and Julia with him on tour.

I think he is first of all a very nice person and second off all a great dancer. I think you can not compare him with Nureyev. I see Nureyev in a differnet catogary. Nureyev really changed the status off the male dancer.

Malakhov did of course do al lot to for the ballet, but that kind of an impact he had not. Maybe he will have that now as a director.

His technik is soft an fragile. He had a very good scholing, also Mr. Pestov. If you look to the video when he was in the Bolschoi school, you see that he LEARNED everything. It's not that he found out some thing, he really studied and learned it. If you take that, and his talent of giving and his fysical talent you have a world dancer.

I have great respect of him!

I hope this was ok for you!!

see you!

Share this post


Link to post

Welcome, Stuttgart, and thank you for posting that!

GWTW, I haven't heard of that company, and apparently no one else has either, since there have been no posts. It may be a group put together for summer tours -- but it does sound interesting, and I hope you'll report on it for us.

Share this post


Link to post

Hi!!!Sorry for not having posted for a long time but my computer suffered from a major virus(I didn't have any Windows-imagine...) I am so grateful that you respond to this thread. I am the happiest person on earth. Vladimir Malakhov is going to come here in Greece to dance Giselle with Diana Vishneva.That is going to happen in December and Leonidas De Pien will choreograph. They will dance in the Megaron of Music. In January he will dance some modern pieces by Neumeier, Duato, Petit, McMillan, Parsons and others. When I heard that, I screamed from my happiness. I can die after seeing him.... Anyway, I just wanted to share my happiness with you!!!! Bye...:)

Share this post


Link to post

Thank you, Marilia -- enjoy it! And please write about it -- I think there are a lot of people here who would be interested in reading about Malakhov's European performances.

Share this post


Link to post

Well, I saw Malakhov almost two weeks ago and thw main reason I didn't write about it that it was a rather disappointing show. As I wrote in a post above, Malakhov came to Israel with 2 programs. After much deliberation I decided to go to the mixed bill program and not to Giselle. That turned out to be a mistake. During a 3 hour long performance, Malakhov himself danced for about 7 minutes !!! in 2 short neo-classical/modern solos. I think these were solos choreograohed especially for him as they were very much like the pieces he dances in 'Prince of the Ballet'. This is certainly not what I expected to see from a prince of the ballet. Definitely not when ticket prices ranged from 45$ to 75$. Absolutely not when all the advertising is centered on Malakhov's name.

:)

A few highlights of the program (which was much too long - everyone would have been better served if a ballet or two had been cut), were an outstanding Farukh Ruzimatov in Sherezade and a polished performance of Paquita. It was also interesting to see Walpurgisnacht, as it was the first time I've seen 'Soviet' choreography on stage and it was very exciting. The lead dancer, who I assume was Diana Vishneva, was excellent and also her partner, a very tall man with chin length straight hair, was good

:confused:

The lowlight - a very strange Bolero (All the programs were in Russian, so I don't know who choreographed it and who danced in the various ballets!!). Oh, and in between there was a lackluster Sleeping Beauty p/d.

Of course, the major disappointment was Malakhov's disappearing act.

So if this troupe comes your way, be warned.

Share this post


Link to post

Thank you for that, GWTW. It happens a lot, I'm afraid. I don't think the intention is to deceive. In the summer, dancers get together in little touring groups, and they're often centered around a star, because that helps get bookings. But if Ruzimatov and Vishneva were there, they're certainly deserving of star billing, too.

Nureyev used to do these kinds of groups a lot -- they were called Nureyev and Friends, and he danced in every ballet (usually) and definitely at every performance, no matter what condition he was in. So the ticket buyers would get what they'd come to see, but he was heavily criticized for "hogging" the spot light, and often what one saw wasn't top drawer.

I'm sorry you were disappointed, but very interested to read your review. I've never seen Walpurgisnacht live, and was very interested to see that it was still in repertory. It's an "old-fashioned" Soviet ballet -- but very exciting, at least on video.

Share this post


Link to post