Jump to content
This Site Uses Cookies. If You Want to Disable Cookies, Please See Your Browser Documentation. ×

2017 Spring Season


Recommended Posts

Edited because the post above was insanely long  :)

 

...I do know that others should at least have a chance to prove themselves, and the HereNow programming seems very narrow to me. I'm not saying it was the worst idea at NYCB since those terrible Valentino costumes, I'm just saying, it was a trifle misguided.

 

Balanchine's foray into Broadway is a favorite topic for some and used to justify all kinds of career side-trajectories, but I'm not sure many understand what he was actually doing and learning there.

Peck is American, born in America, trained in America, he doesn't need to venture into Broadway to get a sense of American dance or culture or sensibility--in any case, I hardly think the freshest ideas and new strains of thought in dance are to be found on Broadway, at this point in time. It was different in the 50s and 60s.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, jkr3855 said:

 

a few points

1)I'm around Justin Peck's age, so I think it's a bit silly to cast this as a generational divide problem

2) It's not an either-or question: either NYCB is a museum or the HereNow festival is the way to present new choreography. This is the way the question is always presented in NYCB marketing materials, and in the press as well. Don't buy into that. Does anyone actually believe ballet is dead? What does that mean anyway, it's just words.

3) I don't want to see only Balanchine--in fact, I don't need to see Balanchine performed exactly the way he was performed five decades ago. I've seen some archived tapes of, say, concerto barocco in which the female dancers looked a bit like Vogue models of the same era--their stance, their expression, some other indefinable quality of the time. That's not necessary, we don't need to keep that. All that--conventions of the time period, anything excess--that should go. And obviously, any conventions of our own time period should go as well--this is what makes work shallow and dated, IMO. I don't know if Peck is able to transcend his era. I don't know if he's the kind of choreographer who can see what is excess and what is necessary to the work, sometimes I think he is, sometimes I think he isn't...

I am ancient compared to you jkr3855 but I don't want to see only Balanchine or Balanchine preformed exactly the way it was done decades ago (I doubt he'd want that either). However, I hate the separation at NYCB of Balanchine and new works. Why do we have to choose between All Balanchine and Here & Now? I'd much prefer a mixed program. That way Balanchine fans like me could get to see new works, and folks interested in the newest choreographers could get a taste of Balanchine. 

Link to comment

Should a spectator who views a ballet for the first time be concerned whether it was created in 1994, 1998, 2006 or 2017? Or if it was choreographed by Lynne Taylor-Corbett, Peter Martins, Jorma Elo or Justin Peck? 

 

Like other contemporary ballets Chiaroscuro contains sequences which seem strange or peculiar. Set to attractive Baroque music, it is nonetheless an appealing, riveting work. Seeing Ashley Laracey and Brittany Pollack (both looking positively gorgeous) in this piece alone was worth the price of admission to program No. 8 of the Festival. These two were well-complemented by Lauren King and the three men in the cast, particularly Andrew Veyette, who had an effective part. This is the sort of ballet with a vague narrative that intrigues you.  

 

Conversely, the Baroque music chosen for Slice to Sharp is less engaging, despite being mostly by Vivaldi. Elo’s reaction on first listening to the latter’s composition, as described in the program note, is worth noting: “he felt ‘It was extreme playing on the edge of madness’ “. This explains somewhat what transpires onstage; but I find neither the baroque melodies nor the accompanying “modern movement” in this ballet especially beautiful. Watching the four(!) principal women—Ashley Bouder, Maria Kowroski, Rebecca Krohn and Teresa Reichlen—cast here dancing, however, has its own rewards. 

 

Artists should never consider any subject—no matter how difficult or controversial—as off-limits for treatment in their work. Things are not so simple in practice, however—particularly one would suppose for choreographers. That Martins’ Stabat Mater served as a tribute to a much-loved ballet teacher who had recently passed away is certainly laudable. Yet is it proper or easy to create a ballet in any way connected to the crucifixion of Christ and Mary’s suffering? A convincing, powerful effort would manage to be at the same time undeniably beautiful (the main function of ballet) and absolutely shattering. Stabat Mater is only the former. Would it be palatable fare to NYCB audiences if it were somehow also the latter? Inevitably, one wonders how the words being sung are reflected in the movement displayed onstage while watching this.

 

Pergolesi’s justly famous opus may not be the most solemn musical treatment of the Catholic hymn, but it is wonderful and moving. (A couple or so sections are mildly jaunty enough to afford the dancers an opportunity to smile.) While it is a score best heard outside the confines of Koch Theater, the fact remains that it is the best music of the program and one of the chief reasons—along with the lighting, the background setting, the colorful costumes and (yes!) the choreography—why the ballet is so beautiful. Lauren Lovette, Ashly Isaacs and naturally Sterling Hyltin (who soared upwards toward the sky when lifted by Jared Angle) appeared and danced like angels. (To have seen Isaacs, incidentally, in both The Times Are Racing and Stabat Mater during the same week was fascinating.) Chase Finlay and Joseph Gordon completed what turned out to be a winsome cast.

 

It is highly improbable to put Sara Mearns and Rebecca Krohn on the stage, have them execute various common balletic steps and motions and not come up with anything beautiful. So, of course, there is beauty to be found in The Decalogue! But what makes this particular work so original, so different from numerous others? Presumably, it is linked to the Ten Commandments; but how so other than the number of dancers it utilizes? More importantly, after hearing the score a second time on Sunday afternoon I find it merely acceptable; and for a ballet to be truly inspiring and touching its music must be arresting! Everywhere We Go and its composition have been much criticized in this forum, but as of now, I find nothing as compelling, as alluring in the new work as the segments assigned to Maria Kowroski (exquisitely also danced by Krohn) in the earlier one. 

Link to comment

I beg forgiveness from Kristen Segin and Rebecca Krohn even if during the premiere of The Decalogue they fell down unintentionally.

 

Segin has generally a tendency to smile too much when dancing. Otherwise, she is one of the loveliest members of the female corps: her presence in The Decalogue is a boon. 

 

Last evening, in the pas de deux with Gonzalo Garcia from Slice to Sharp and throughout The Decalogue, Rebecca Krohn was magnificent! Original or not, Justin Peck’s new work is indeed quite beautiful; and its music is becoming attractive to my ears. Not only does it use ten dancers, but it is divided into ten sections. In the 8th—a pas de deux with Jared Angle—Krohn was especially wondrous.

 

Geminiani’s adaptation of Corelli’s famous Concerto Grosso is not just attractive: it is splendid—which is in part what made these performances of Chiaroscuro so marvelous. 

 

No matter what Stravinsky thought, Vivaldi did compose excellent music; so, of course, a portion of the music used in Slice to Sharp is pleasing. But the best here is probably that used in the pas de deux mentioned above.

 

Notwithstanding the strikingly tepid response from the crowd, the cast in Stabat Mater gave another excellent performance of this work. Something notable in this run was how ethereal, how spiritual Lauren Lovette and Ashly Isaacs seemed when their respective countenance was serious. For reasons not worth relating, from a musical standpoint last night’s performance was superior. A greater portion of the score than I realized is in a livelier mode, which paradoxically makes it easier to use in a work of dance.

Link to comment

Thoroughly enjoyed Here/Now #8 last night, particularly THE DECALOGUE. So happy to see Justin Peck's return to his pure neoclassical base. All 10 dancers were amazing but Rebecca Krohn was especially fluid, musical, and luscious! Those who stuck around the first three ballets - particularly the plodding STABAT MATER, despite fine dancing - were greatly rewarded in the end.  

Link to comment

Saw the last performance of the Here/Now festival.

 

While the dancing was fantastic, I could barely stay awake during the first two pieces (though I did enjoy seeing Tess Reichlen in Red Angels).  Normally I love Hyltin and Stanley, but I just couldn't get into Varied Trios.  These 2 pieces were just blah... to me.

 

Barber Violin Concerto was a bit better (in fact it's the first Martins work I enjoyed) thanks to the amazing dancing of Mearns and especially Alexa Maxwell (who filled in for Fairchild).

 

The second half was much better, as I enjoyed all 3 pieces.  Maria K and Ask Lacour were even better today in After the Rain then they were a few weeks ago.  Kowroski's body is insane.  This PDD really highlights her absolutely stunning long legs, and the positions and lines that she makes are just breathtaking.  I hope she keeps dancing for awhile so I can see more of her because it really is a privilege to watch her dance.

 

Tiler Peck and Chase Findlay were the leads in Polaris.  I enjoyed this much more than I expected to.  I loved the way Thatcher moved the ensemble around... he has a talent at choreographing groups of dancers across the stage. And Tiler was her usual evervescent self.

 

The best was saved for last, which was Concerto DSCH.  Garcia and De Luz were the stars of the show.  I also loved Mearns and Angle (and wow is the second movement pas just lovely choreography).  The background corps dancers were full of energy and danced with great electricity.  I was a little let down with  Bouder.  I hate saying that as she is one of my favorite dancers but I thought she kind of went in and out with her energy levels and she was out danced by her two partners.  In fact, I thought several of the corps dancers had more energy as well.  I know the dancers have been through the ringer with this Here/Now festival, (and Concerto DSCH looks like a very hard ballet to dance) so I'm sure that likely played a role.  But in my opinion, she has seemed a little off to me in the 3 or so performances I've seen her in this spring.  I still love her though, and can't wait to see her in the fall.

 

I wont be seeing Midsummer's this year, so that's a wrap on the NYCB spring season for me.  I didn't hate the Here/Now festival.  In fact it exposed me to some works I wouldn't have necessarily sought out myself.  But I am looking forward to NYCB reverting back to a nice mix of Balanchine and the newer stuff next year.

Edited by Kaysta
Link to comment

I was at the Sun. matinee show and had a great time except for the Martin's Barber Violin Concerto. I've seen it several times and for me, it's at its most entertaining the first time it's seen and upon each repeat viewing it loses more and more.

 

I enjoyed all the other ballets. Red Angels gave the dancers a chance to show a variety of musical qualities. Teresa Reichlin and Preston Chamblee showed a wonderful precision in their movement, combined with a plastique.

 

Sterling Hyltin & Taylor Stanley were quite wonderful in Varied Trio. I found the section with a variety of lifts particularly fun. I really liked the Lou Harrison score.
 

Polaris was also quite enjoyable. Tiler Peck riveting in movement and stillness. Choreographically I love the way Miles Thatcher moved groups around - the unison dancing was well choreographed and well danced.

 

After the Rain is a touching pas de duex. It is inventive and has very human movements that just touch the heart. 

 

Concerto DSCH is pure fun. Ashley Bouder always makes me smile and she really delivered with her speed and musicality. I found Sarah Mearns performance a bit muted in both this ballet and in the Barber piece but it was still enjoyable.

 

I attended with a broadway choreographer. She had as much fun as I did!

 

What a great company!

Link to comment

A new casting sheet is up for Midsummer Night's Dream. It looks like Savannah Lowery is out, resulting in reshuffling of the casting for Hippolyta. Ashley Hod gets a debut in the role, and Emily Kikta picks up a second performance, in addition to her debut. 

Link to comment

On paper it might seem a tad dull. Program No. 9 of the Festival, however, which was made up of Red Angels, Varied Trio (in four), Barber Violin Concerto, followed after intermission by Polaris, After the Rain pas de deux, and Concerto DSCH was a genuine feast for the eyes and ears. 

 

Color dazzles me; so, the use of red in the first ballet—particularly in the final tableau, with its obvious resemblance to Agon—was entrancing. Dove’s choreography may not be extraordinary, but with Angels such as Rebecca Krohn and Teresa Reichlen in the cast this was highly enjoyable.

 

With its use of light blue contrasting sharply with the previous production, Varied Trio—notwithstanding its nondescript title; and echoes of at least two Balanchine ballets—was radiant and thoroughly delightful. Not being familiar with the music of this composer, I was surprised by how lovely the Lou Harrison score (partly utilizing peculiar percussive instrumentation) for this work is—particularly the third movement. Sterling Hyltin’s use of the arms and hands in this ballet was striking; and the ending was adorable.

 

Assuming at least a decent performance, it is no longer possible for this listener to hear Barber’s Violin Concerto without being stirred: it is one of the finest of all concertos. Its first two movements are breathtaking, the second being especially poignant. Martins’ decision to choreograph Barber Violin Concerto for just two couples, one from the world of classical dance and one from the world of modern dance, which effectively change partners in the latter two movements is intrinsically intriguing. Howsoever one regards the humor and friskiness of the short last segment of this ballet, its two first parts—always taking account of the haunting music—are impressive. Sara Mearns was superb in the role of the female classical dancer; and seemingly danced with every fiber of her being, as she typically does. With his body type, Jared Angle is uniquely suited for the role of the male modern dancer and partnered her with great finesse in the evocative second section. Color again plays a significant role here, with the white of the costumes blending beautifully with the dark blue of the backdrop.

 

A mixture of black and white and gray characterizes the palette of Polaris, which appropriately (since this ballet is about the stars in the heavens) makes it plausible for the empathetic viewer to feel they are looking into space. Listening several times beforehand to William Walton’s Allegramente from Piano Quartet in d minor made it easier to concentrate on and enjoy Myles Thatcher’s choreography. In addition to all the balletic motions she performs so beautifully, what struck me here were Tiler Peck’s contemplative gazes. When facing the audience, she seemed to be peering at—the cosmos.

 

For several years, Maria Kowroski has been the de facto senior ballerina of NYCB. (All three women who could have laid claim to the appellation were plagued with injuries during their final years with the company.) This contributed greater poignancy to all the recent performances of the pas de deux from After the Rain, performances which were among the highlights of the season. Arvo Pärt’s Spiegel im Spiegel is a repetitious, but powerful and spiritual composition to which Wheeldon created apt and irresistible choreography. The beauty of Kowroski’s long limbs and extensions, as well as her noble demeanor were evident throughout this run. Ask la Cour partnered her superbly.

 

A dazzling array of color suffuses Concerto DSCH—its production, its music, its choreography. Shostakovich’s Piano Concerto No.2 in F major is as haunting a composition as is Barber’s Violin Concerto: in its mere 22 minutes or so it combines brilliantly an infectious vigor and liveliness with a profound, gentle yet aching melancholy. Ratmansky matches his compatriot’s brilliance with some of his own and provides every conceivable ballet lover with something to relish in this work. In the outer movements, in addition to all the sparkling activity for the corps there is bravura galore not just for the main couple, but for three other soloists, two males and a female. Gonzalo Garcia and the amazing Joaquin De Luz shone in this season’s performances of the ballet. Although she has been experiencing a slight problem with her turns during the spring, on Sunday afternoon, Ashley Bouder—in a part which takes advantage of all her dynamic qualities—was fantastic!

 

What is probably the most thrilling moment of the ballet, however, is the lift involving the main couple—in this run, Sara Mearns and Tyler Angle—that occurs during the musical climax of the first movement. Mearns’ poise and Tyler Angle’s strength in this sequence took the breath away. And yet, the heart and soul of both the music and the ballet lie in the sublime, pensive few minutes inserted between the livelier segments. Three other couples, in addition to the main one, share the stage and immeasurably enhance the beauty of this section—the section for which this work by Ratmansky will likely be long remembered.

 

Link to comment

But what if when Titania opened her eyes the first being she laid eyes on was a prince who had lost himself in this humongous universe? Just kidding, of course!

 

Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night's Dream, as well as Balanchine’s ballet based on the play, are both truly great. This week’s NYCB performances at Koch Theater, therefore, invite plenteous comment. For now I will simply say that with a cast that includes Ashley Laracey as Hermia, Brittany Pollack as Helena and Ashly Isaacs as Hippolyta, I would happily have attended tonight’s performance if I had the appropriate ticket. 

 

Although I did have a ticket for the matinee, after the utterly sublime, ennobling performance of the Divertissement last evening by Tiler Peck and Tyler Angle (the wonderful Sleeping Beauty pair from this past winter) there was no way—much as I respect all of NYCB’s artists—I could bring myself to go to the theater.

Link to comment

I saw two performances so far (Wednesday with Mearns and Veyette, and Friday with Miller and Ulbricht). I enjoy it as the final week of the spring season, kind of a pendant to Nutcracker - season-appropriate, featuring lots of irresistible children, and vehicles for many fine dancers. I will miss it next year! Coppelia (which will occupy much of that last week) is one of my least favorite pieces. The two performances I saw were both excellent. Mearns is beauty personified as Titania. She is warm, lush, humorous, glamorous, and goes at everything with both confidence and abandon. Miller looked better than when I've seen her before, she's gaining some poise and maturity, but to me she lacks depth and is not especially interesting. Veyette got through the choreography just fine, not as tired looking as he often has been recently. Ulbricht really dazzled, of course, and didn't overact. I was really sorry Anthony Huxley was out, especially since they are not doing this next year; I loved his Oberon, especially the scherzo. Megan Fairchild and Jared Angle did a wonderful divertissement; Fairchild has become a dancer I enjoy far more than I used to. And of course Tiler Peck and Tyler Angle were sublime. Emily Kikta was secure and very grand as Hippolyta. Look forward to the final performance tomorrow!

Edited by cobweb
Link to comment

Yes, I surmised as much when Carmena got flowers and the dancers all applauded him. Just wish he had gotten a solo curtain call! I have enjoyed him in many, many performances over the past years. I will miss him! 

I was astounded by how fresh and wonderful Maria Kowroski looked. Honestly, when she went on maternity leave and then took so long to come back, I doubted I'd ever see her again. And I certainly never thought to see her like this! I couldn't detect any diminishment of anything. Those legs! And so charming and funny with Bottom. Top-notch Maria Kowroski. Thanks!!

Her maidens include so many promising dancers. Newcomer Christina Clark is lovely and graceful. And I really, really wish to see more of Isabella LaFreniere. She has a presence and a beaming smile that could fill up the whole stage.  

I saw Sean Suozzi do Puck twice this season. Two very heroic and committed performances. I know that, like Carmena, he is a long-time soloist (not quite as long-term, I guess) and hasn't been getting new roles, but IMHO he deserves them. I was wondering how he'd be as Oberon. 

Harrison Coll brought a wonderful pathos to Bottom. When the rustics reunited, I was brought to joyful tears, and the audience also applauded - not a moment that usually gets applause. 

Emily Kikta (Hippolyta) dances on a grand scale. She's another one I'd like to see more of. 

It was a strange season, starting with a blast of brilliant Balanchine, then I dipped a little into Ratmansky, followed by a solid month of no performances at all. Then MSND. Bring back the Balanchine!

Link to comment

I remember what an exciting impression Carmens made on me when he first joined the company, and I continued to enjoy his performances over the years though seeing him much less once I departed New York. Hope he has a great future--whether as a chef or anything else....

Link to comment

 

Over the summer I listened to the music used in two ballets shown during the Here/Now Festival, and which will also be performed during the 2017-18 season.

 

As a non-musician, I perceive two thematic strands in the first of the four pieces from Dan Deacon’s America to be utilized in The Times Are Racing. Let’s call them A and B. The pattern in this section is ABA. However, the same music is used in the fourth and final section of the album (and ballet); but the pattern there is BA. This A strand is, in my opinion, powerful and even majestic. As I listened further to the music, I came to appreciate the B strand also, especially since the cumulative effect of both the buildup and the transition from B to A in both sections is thrilling. Similarly, I became more appreciative of the admittedly rhythmical, pulsating music of the second and third pieces, being particularly taken by the vocalized portions of the former. This type of composition is not, of course, what is typically heard during NYCB performances; but Dan Deacon’s work is loud and thematically unappealing only for those who simply don’t like this type of music.

 

Incongruous and peculiar as it may be, especially given the aggressively pedestrian clothing the dancers on stage wear, there is actually a majestic quality to the opening choreography of The Times Are Racing also. This quality is perfectly captured in the photograph from the ballet displayed in the brochure for the upcoming season. The greater portion of the dancing in this work, however, is likewise atypical of what patrons are used to at NYCB. Justin Peck’s “sneaker ballet” is a work of contemporary dance instead of a ballet. Divergent opinions about its quality and value are, therefore, naturally unsurprising. Even though I am as unfamiliar with this kind of dancing as anyone could possibly be, I happen to find The Times Are Racing rousing and life-affirming.

 

Nevertheless, the versatility shown by NYCB’s dancers should elicit general admiration! In an earlier post, I suggested how delighted I was to have watched Ashly Isaacs during the spring perform so capably in two such vastly dissimilar works as The Times Are Racing and Stabat Mater within the space of a few days. Likewise, within a week or so after doing all those handstands and twisting motions last winter, Tiler Peck gave impeccable performances as—of all things—Princess Aurora in The Sleeping Beauty!

 

Fortunately, Ms. Peck is wearing a traditional, attractive ballet costume in The Times Are Racing. Thanks to a leisurely, fortuitous stroll one warm summer weekend day in the vicinity of 14th Street, however, I came to realize that the outfits the other dancers wear in this “sneaker ballet” are not that far off the mark after all.

 

Excepting Teresa Reichlen’s presence in it, Year of the Rabbit—which I had seen two or three times previously—was one of the most disappointing ballets at the Festival, partly as a result of the music by Sufjan Stevens seeming insipid. How pleasantly surprised I was after listening to the complete album—titled Enjoy Your Rabbit—to discover that (alongside a few strange sounds) it contained gorgeous music! Initially thinking that too many performances of it had been scheduled for the upcoming season, I look forward to watching Year of the Rabbit again and determine whether the orchestration devitalized to any extent Stevens’ music. Be this as it may, a pattern is discernible here: it is easy to underestimate this composer’s music, and sundry musical compositions in general.

Link to comment

One curious aspect of Program No. 7 of the Here/Now Festival is that it seemingly took this motif of “the play of light and shadow” referenced by Chiaroscuro and extended it throughout the evening. Two ballets representative of “shadow”--Funérailles and Oltremare--were interspersed between the three (Ash, Common Ground, and Rodeo: Four Dance Episodes) in which “light” was predominant.

 

Ash, Funérailles, and Common Ground were separated by pauses, while the other two followed intermissions.

 

Hardly anyone would consider Ash a distinguished ballet; but it is pleasant to watch Ashly Isaacs in this role, and each one of the various members of the corps in the cast (there was a soloist actually among them in the spring) is notably afforded the opportunity to momentarily gain the spotlight.

 

Darkness--literal and metaphorical--pervades Liam Scarlett’s Funérailles. This work appears to be about a nineteenth century aristocratic woman’s yearning for—love and death! Franz Liszt’s brooding, eerie yet potent and haunting piano piece (with a singularly gorgeous interlude); Tiler Peck’s stunning look wearing that ornamented dress and hairdo, and the extraordinarily expressive way she used her arms and head; Jared Angle’s mysterious allure and deft partnering--all combined together to generate out of the choreography a mesmerizing pas de deux.

 

Dispersal of the gloominess came after the pause by way of Common Ground, which featured the cavorting of seven free-spirited, lively creatures dressed like flower children. Whether it is composed of peculiar movement or not, a ballet which showcases the lovely, strikingly graceful Ashley Laracey commands attention. And how imposing a presence Teresa Reichlen always remains on the stage, even when dressed in such garb! A difficult, three-jump sequence which occurs towards the end of Troy Schumacher’s work is especially memorable. Even though I had seen Common Ground before my enjoyment of it in May exceeded all expectations, in part because its contemporary score was attractive throughout and even gained force in its closing moments.

 

To be sure, Oltremare is not conventionally beautiful; but that should not be surprising given its subject matter—immigrants around 1900 leaving their homeland in search of a better life. What a remarkable contrast there naturally is, in terms of music, costumes, and style of dancing, between Mauro Bigonzetti’s work and Vienna Waltzes! Maria Kowroski, Ashly Isaacs, and Tyler Angle in particular made vivid impressions here. Tiler Peck’s suitably plain dress seemed too large and consequently made her look shorter; but that—putting aside how her mien befitted the role of a fin de siècle immigrant—only enhanced her glamorous appearance earlier in the evening, and her dancing was (as always) superb. To have seen Ms. Peck portray two women in such differing socioeconomic circumstances on the same program was  a treat! Recollecting Maria Kowroski’s and Tyler Angle’s aristocratic portrayals in Balanchine’s famous ballet is, of course, also interesting.

 

In the program note, Bigonzetti mentions--while discussing Oltremare--“the excitement and joy of a new world.” And that is opportunely what Aaron Copland’s acclaimed Rodeo embodies, as does Justin Peck’s ballet. Undeniably, the vibrancy and effervescence found in the score and choreography of the 1st and 4th Episodes of Rodeo are catchy; and the men of NYCB--principals as well as members of the corps--served both well during the Festival’s performances. What haunts the imagination, however, is Copland’s “Corral Nocturne” or 2nd Episode. Mr. Peck’s choreography for five men in this section is appositely beautiful and illustrates how graceful men too can be in ballet. Devin Alberda, Daniel Applebaum, Preston Chamblee and Andrew Scordato were all marvelous, while Taylor Stanley’s part in this Episode is simply unforgettable.

 

Familiarity has softened the initial impact of this ballet’s peculiarity. Being the sole female in the cast merely heightens the importance of whichever ballerina is assigned the role; and her dancing in a colorful leotard amply compensates for the rugby apparel several of the men are clothed in. Brittany Pollack was delightful in Rodeo, especially in the 3rd Dance Episode—a pas de deux, in which she was partnered by the choreographer himself, set to Copland’s captivating “Saturday Night Waltz”.

 

In my opinion, Jerome Robbins’ Dances at a Gathering is one of the most moving and profound works in the NYCB repertory. Sara Mearns, Tiler Peck, and Brittany Pollack have been the women cast so far as the ballerina in Rodeo. All three together participated in outstanding performances of Dances during the Spring of 2016.

Edited by Royal Blue
Link to comment

Apropos Brittany Pollack: not only is she an admirable ballerina, but she also stands out on account of her conspicuous womanliness. It is no wonder, therefore, that Justin Peck casts her so often in his ballets. She appeared in no less than three of the four works featured in the program of the Festival (No. 3) dedicated to Mr. Peck's choreography.

 

In Creases has not had the benefit of an extended run during any season since its premiere five years ago. Regardless, it is a lovely ballet. An ensemble work for eight dancers who during its course create luxuriant patterns, all in the cast during the spring charmed, especially Pollack.

 

On the other hand, I have already seen The Dreamers (2016)—a pas de deux for Sara Mearns and Amar Ramasar set to the music of a movement from a Bohuslav Martinu Piano Quintet--several times. A stream of directional changes (left to right and vice versa) in the ballerina’s pirouettes—signifying perhaps capricious, volatile thoughts and feelings?— characterizes this work. Mearns’ and Ramasar’s proficient performances combined with Martinu’s arresting music ensured this ballet’s enjoyableness.

 

More problematic was New Blood, whose unprepossessing music by Steve Reich I should have listened to beforehand. Maybe having done so would have made watching it a more rewarding experience. Undoubtedly, however, the experience would have been even less gratifying if Pollack was not in the ballet--both due to her dancing and the fact that she always looks nifty, even when attired in as outlandish an outfit as the one on display here.

 

After the program’s only intermission came the main piece of the evening--Everywhere We Go. While there are similarities between this and other ballets, it is, nevertheless, a captivating work which contains moments—from both a musical and choreographic standpoint—of considerable delicacy, as well as power. All the men impressed; but the women signally dazzled in Janie Taylor’s bright costumes for them. Pollack and several members of the female corps were fabulous. Yet, although it is an effective, endearing ballet in any case, what made watching Everywhere We Go so richly satisfying was the incandescent dancing of the four female principals in the cast: Sterling Hyltin, Maria Kowroski, Teresa Reichlen, and Tiler Peck!

Edited by Royal Blue
Link to comment

Jeu de Cartes is a ballet I can watch with pleasure only if one ballerina is cast in the leading role; and wouldn’t it be far more desirable to observe her weave her magic instead in masterpieces like Serenade and Symphony in C, in which she belongs? Notwithstanding the solid effort and élan of the dancers, and two or three satisfactory moments, ten in seven appeared likewise unsubstantial and weak. As I pointed out previously, on the other hand, the pas de deux from Christopher Wheeldon’s After the Rain was eloquent and touching. While not as affecting, Lauren Lovette’s For Clara is an amiable work in traditional style which offered three promising female soloists—Emilie Gerrity, Unity Phelan and Indiana Woodward—a chance to shine. So it is justifiable to claim that for 2/3s of its span, Program No. 5 of the Festival was rather mediocre: the strengths of two ballets were counterbalanced by the weaknesses of two others.

 

Alexei Ratmansky’s new work for NYCB, which followed after the second intermission, changed the entire tenor of the evening. Odessa came across as a serious and important, rich and exciting work of art. Unfortunately, I missed the first cast; but the second one, which included Ashley Bouder, Megan Fairchild, and Unity Phelan in the female leads was wonderful. Particularly impressive was Ms. Fairchild’s mature, adult rendition of her role. Leonid Desyatnikov’s score—“Sketches to Sunset"--was compelling throughout, but reached its emotional peak during the first 2 ½ minutes of VIII, “Evening”. Frankly, it would have been preferable if more than four performances of Odessa had been scheduled during the 2017-18 season.

 

Incidentally, one of the finest particulars about the Here/Now Festival was the opportunity it offered to have seen Unity Phelan perform major parts in six ballets: For Clara, The Blue of Distance, American Rhapsody, Fearful Symmetries, Polyphonia, and --most importantly--Odessa. I have every expectation that as she grows (as a human being, as a woman, as an artist), as she gains greater confidence in her abilities and powers, and as she sheds all vestiges of self-consciousness during performance Phelan will blossom into a first-rate ballerina, especially with respect to adagio dancing.

Edited by Royal Blue
Link to comment
On 9/2/2017 at 9:10 PM, Royal Blue said:

In my opinion, Jerome Robbins’ Dances at a Gathering is one of the most moving and profound works in the NYCB repertory. Sara Mearns, Tiler Peck, and Brittany Pollack have been the women cast so far as the ballerina in Rodeo. All three together participated in outstanding performances of Dances during the Spring of 2016.

 

Dances at a Gathering holds a special place in many hearts -- I'm hoping that the Robbins centennial next year includes performances of DAG all over the place.

Link to comment

How I wish I could have seen the recent NYCB performances of Dances at a Gathering at Saratoga, particularly in light of Rebecca Krohn’s impending retirement …

 

By all means, contemporary choreographers should be held to a high standard, and their works accordingly criticized. However, even though I recognize that the recent works created for NYCB are not groundbreaking and do not compare favorably with the best that the company has to offer, it would be untruthful to maintain that (generally speaking) I find absolutely nothing to savor in them. 

 

Many people—I would imagine—disliked the ballets that made up Program No. 4 of the Festival: Neverwhere, Mothership, Spectral Evidence, and The Times Are Racing. Regarding the last, what I would add to my comments above is that Robert Fairchild and Ashly Isaacs, through the exceptional quality of their respective performances, have amply demonstrated the efficacy of the unisex role in Justin Peck’s “sneaker ballet.” There was something of interest in all three other works also, especially Spectral Evidence.

 

Quite possibly, the dancers find the attire they have to wear in Neverwhere cumbersome. Nevertheless, notably the women—Emilie  Gerrity, Sterling Hyltin, and Lauren Lovette—looked grand in them, resembling personages from a Wagnerian opera. Some difficulties Lovette experienced with her steps, I suspect, were not attributable to the unwieldy apparel. Benjamin Millepied’s choreography is serviceable; the piece is not long; combined with the unusual but magnetic costumes Neverwhere is pleasant to watch.

 

So too is Mothership, mainly for a different reason. Again, Nicolas Blanc’s choreography is acceptable, and the ballet brief. Its cast, however, is made up of eight members of the corps; and it is absorbing to occasionally witness featured somewhat prominently in a work dancers perforce usually relegated to the background. Jacqueline Bologna is endearing; Baily Jones has an auspicious stage presence. Perhaps others in the audience were struck by an encouraging trait in one of the other young dancers.

 

Like the John Cage music it uses, Angelin Preljocaj’s Spectral Evidence is bizarre, hallucinatory, ominous; and in its entirety—in a similar manner as its apparent subject: witchcraft—fascinating. In the leading male role, Robert Fairchild (in a highly commendable impromptu appearance necessitated by Amar Ramasar’s injury) evinced plenty of aplomb; but much credit is due to the seven other dancers on stage, too. The way light and dark contrast in this piece is, naturally, prominent. Its foremost, distinguishing characteristic, however, is the usage of four cabinets. Although the female lead in Spectral Evidence monopolized (as is her wont) my attention, the synchronicity all four women observed peripherally in my vision displayed as they moved or slid on top of the cabinets, beat their hands on them as if they were drums, twisted magically inside them, and, finally, jumped off them at the ballet’s conclusion was astounding.

Edited by Royal Blue
Link to comment
48 minutes ago, Royal Blue said:

 

Like the John Cage music it uses, Angelin Preljocaj’s Spectral Evidence is bizarre, hallucinatory, ominous; and in its entirety—in a similar manner as its apparent subject: witchcraft—fascinating. In the leading male role, Robert Fairchild (in a highly commendable impromptu appearance necessitated by Amar Ramasar’s injury) evinced plenty of aplomb; but much credit is due to the seven other dancers on stage, too. The way light and dark contrast in this piece is, naturally, prominent. Its foremost, distinguishing characteristic, however, is the usage of four cabinets. Although the female lead in Spectral Evidence monopolized (as is her wont) my attention, the synchronicity all four women observed peripherally in my vision displayed as they moved or slid on top of the cabinets, beat their hands on them as if they were drums, twisted magically inside them, and, finally, jumped off them at the ballet’s conclusion was astounding.

I remember finding Spectral Evidence very compelling and I found Fairchild and Peck (in the cast I saw) just amazing -- I don't applaud difference for difference's sake, and I love NYCB's regular repertory, but given how interesting I found the ballet and the performances it elicited I also appreciated how different it was from much (if not all) of the company's other repertory.

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...