Jump to content

This site uses cookies. By using this site, you agree to accept cookies, unless you've opted out. (US government web page with instructions to opt out: http://www.usa.gov/optout-instructions.shtml)

Info: Things to read

  • Please log in to reply
No replies to this topic

#1 Alexandra


    Board Founder

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,301 posts

Posted 06 November 2001 - 12:20 PM

For most of the 20th century, in the West, at least, we believed that "Sleeping Beauty" was the one great 19th century classical ballet that hadn't changed very much. It's so tightly constructed (and so matches the score) that it hadn't been tampered with.

Well, like many things we all "know," this has turned out not to be quite true. For those interested in history, I'd suggest reading Doug Fullington's article about the recent reconstruction of "Sleeping Beauty" that's posted on Marc Haegeman's web site: http://users.skynet....rs/Beauty1.html

There's also a lot of material on the ballet by Mel Johnson on this site:


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Help support Ballet Alert! and Ballet Talk for Dancers year round by using this search box for your amazon.com purchases. (If it doesn't appear below, your computer's or browser's adblockers may have blocked display):