Kirov's Sleeping Beauty/opening night
Posted 13 February 2002 - 12:53 AM
I'll just say I was very glad to see the production and fell in love with Petipa all over again. I loved the sets and costumes, and I loved the mime (oodles and oodles of mime) as well as the processions. I'm happy to see every single thing that's been cut over the years.
We've posted this link before, but for those who are interested in how this production differs from other Kirov productions, there's a superb article by Doug Fullington on Marc Haegeman's site (check the site for info and photos of Kirov dancers, too smile.gif ):
I hope some of you will get to go -- it is sold out now. Please post if you do.
Posted 13 February 2002 - 09:04 AM
Gorgeous company; gorgeous ballet!
Diana Vishneva's Aurora is the glory of the Russian ballet! As Aurora, Vishneva radiates warmth & love from her very first entrance down the palace steps to the courtyard. She was perfect last night in the Rose Adagio (excellent balances performed calmly, serenely), without the straining hyperextensions of some of her colleagues. She even overcame shoddy partnering from one of the four princes (the youngest - Firsov?), who almost let go of her in a pirouette. Her three big solos -- one each in Acts I, II & III -- were crystal-pure; the audience 'oohed-and-ahhhed' at the developees in her Act II (Dream Scene) variation. I felt totally at-ease watching Diana Vishneva throughout the ballet & could delight in her artistry. An Aurora for the ages.
A note on Vishneva's physical changes during the past year or so: Her physical beauty remains incomparable...but I wish that she had not changed her alluring raven haircolor to coppery-red! [Even if it was a wig, never before have I seen her dance this role with anything BUT her naturally-black haircolor! Her look was Fonteyn-extraordinary before. Go back to the black hair, Diana!] I was especially pleased to see that she has regained the sleek & ultra-slim (yet athletic-healthy-looking) physique that I remember from her 1995 graduation performances through about 1997, before she became more hourglass-shaped. The hourglass is now gone; Vishneva is sleek perfection now, in my book. Can't wait to see the 'new Diana' in Rubies tomorrow night.
Igor Kolb's Prince Desire, while nicely danced, was less-than-princely. As much as I admire Kolb's technique, delectably-arched feet, and gracious personality, I simply cannot appreciate him as a 'danseur noble.' I even failed to realize the prince's arrival on the stage during the Act II Hunt Scene until he began to shoot the arrows! Uh...let's see, that LOOKS like Desire's red jacket & curly wig but..no...is it the Prince? To his credit, Kolb delivered a light and airy Act III solo that garnered robust applause from the audience.
Veronika Part's Lilac Fairy was danced and mimed with majesty. Her upper body has - ahum - blossomed considerably since I last saw her in London. The altered physique works here; she looks very Maria Petipa-esque in those costumes now, so more power to her. I'm not sure if the 'new look' will work in the ethereal second-ballerina role of 'Emeralds,' which I have adored in the past. We'll see tonight, when 'Jewels' opens & she dances her waltz solo.
My long-time-favorite mime in the world, Vladimir Ponomariev, was his wonderful hammy self as King Florestan, this time making googly-eyes at a younger queen, the glamorous Elena Bazhenova. I must admit that he was even hammier &, thus, funnier (for me) when his consort was Nina Borchenko, who did not make this tour. [About 89 Kirov dancers are here for the ballet season, out of 150-plus dancers in the company. Many famous soloists - Lopatkina, Makhalina, Ivanchenko, Thomas, etc. -- are dancing in Don Quixote, Giselle or Romeo & Juliet back home.]
But even Ponomariev was not the 'top mime' on stage last night. I reserve that honor for Andrei Yakovlev as Catalabutte, the master of ceremonies who loses his red locks early-on. What an artist, this Yakovlev! I delighted in his carefully crafted characterization, replete with subtle comic details. Some 100 people on stage but my eyes honed in on his funny shenanigans & exchanges with the herald. I was so grateful for my close-up seat last night, as I'll be sitting up in 2nd tier the rest of the run & won't be able to admire Yakovlev-Catalabutte so up-close-and-personal. Bravo, Yakovlev!!!!
The absolute-highlight among the soloist men -- waking up the sleepy audience to huge applause -- was Vitaly Scherbakov as Bluebird. This very-young-looking lad SOARED! His Princess Florine was Natalia Sologub.
The playbill listed 'Irina Golub' as the Diamond Fairy & I was so looking forward to seeing her in a big solo, as I have grown to admire this very young soloist since I saw her in NYC in Jan 1998 with a group of Vaganova students. So you can imagine my surprise when -- unannounced during the breaks or in the programme -- out comes veteran Elvira Tarassova as Diamond! Tarassova did a commendable job, a fine classicist as always...but my eyes were riveted to the beauty & magnificence (positions, technique, drop-dead-gorgeous face & flashing eyes] of the girl dancing Gold Fairy in the background. Who is she, this miracle? Wow! I looked in my programme after the show - it is an 'unknown' named Viktoria Tereshkina. Remember the name. She is slated to dance Diamond Fairy in the Sunday matinee. [Does anybody know when she graduated? Must have been in the last year or two.]
Among the five Prologue fairies (beside Lilac), I most admired Xenia Ostreikovskaya's languidly-danced Fairy Candide (the first solo; silvery-grey tutu). Ostreikovskaya is a magnificent artist who may very well become an Aurora some day! The other fairies were:
Fleur de Farine - Maya Dumchenko, always beautiful
Breadcrumb - Elena Yukhovskaya (a petite newcomer who had nice moments but seemed to be essaying the solo for the first time
Violante - Irina Zhelonkina - a true classisist...seemed tired...or troubled..or both, last night. Not into it at all. Too bad.
Canari - adorable Yana Selina, in a role that she has made her own through the years. [Selina was also a stand-out among the fairy-tale characters in the final act, as the White Cat, with Kirill Simonov a total 'hoot' as Puss-in-Boots. Audience loved them!]
The corps de ballet was its usual impeccable self, especially those beautiful nymphs in Act II. I delighted in all of them & was especially admiring of Tatyana Nekipelova, one of Inna Zubkovskaya's protegees from the Vaganova class of '96. I hope that Nekipelova gets to reprise her demisolo role in the female quartet in 'Diamonds'...nobody dances that section with such gusto & Russian-Imperial spirit!
The children were very well rehearsed & great fun to watch. Students from the Washington School of Ballet, they are, by far, the best group of 'guest kids' (non-Vaganova Academy) that I've seen in these ensembles (I compare with NYC 1999 & London in August 2000; Vaganova Academy was in the June segment of the 2000 London run). I bet that, after the show, the Kirov coaches gave the Washington children notes regarding the "Look-Ma! I'm dancing!"-type grins at their families in the audience, when they should have sported Mariinsky-aristocratic-aloofness instead. Those little cherubs in Lilac Fairy's boat are cute...but they should have remained completely still. Oh, well - they did a superb job overall. Bravo, children!
I was disappointed in the 'flatness' of the sleepy audience (at least in center-orchestra section, where I was) & the lack-of-raport with what-was-going-on up on the stage, during much of the show. Perhaps they were waiting for more dancing in the Prologue? They warmed up by Act III & delivered a standing ovation at the end, with multiple 'bravos' for Vishneva & Kolb. [This appeared to be a 'more senior,' well-heeled audience in pearls & Channel suits....I do miss the gusto of NYB-Met audiences or the adoring Russians in the Mariinsky audiences. smile.gif ]
Welcome to Washington, Kirov Ballet! Ochien rada vudiet vas! Make yourselves at home, now & for the following nine Februaries (at least). And - most importantly - Gracias/Spasibo/Thank You to Alberto Vilar for making it all possible!
[ February 13, 2002: Message edited by: Jeannie ]
Posted 13 February 2002 - 01:08 PM
Posted 13 February 2002 - 01:11 PM
Posted 13 February 2002 - 02:05 PM
I agree with much of what Jeannie wrote and was also very disappointed with the rather reserved audience. But I was very happy to see several dancers there, as well as some of our modern dance choreographers! This was an event!!! If there were any government people there, though, I missed them.
A colleague who'd seen the production in New York said that the dancing and miming was generally more in period style and that the lighting was better, or at least brighter, here than it had been in New York. I loved seeing the detail in the fairies variations -- although the stage is smaller than the dancers are used to, it's an intimate house, and I think we're very lucky to see the production here.
My only disappointment was in the leads. For me, Vishneva isn't ideally cast as Aurora; she's more a Princess Florine. She reminds me of Makarova --in the sense that she's in the Makarova, rather than Kolpakova/Lezhnina, "line" or employ--although I don't think she's nearly as strong technically, nor as musical. I found Vishneva very contemporary, and thus a bit out of style with the production -- I'm looking forward to seeing her in "Rubies," which, by rights, should have been Makarova's role! But I've seen stronger Auroras, in this company and others. I didn't see a "build" from act to act, and so I didn't think she crowned the ballet. That said, Vishneva's third act pas de deux was quite good, I thought. I'm getting the sense more and more, from companies all over the world, that solos and pas de deux are coached and coached and rehearsed (in those companies that still rehearse, of course) -- but in separate little rooms, miles from where the other rehearsals take place, and so the variations seem separate from the ballet, as though the dancers are bussed in as guest stars for the occasion, rather than emerging, triumphant, from a ballet's very fabric.
I heard several conflicting comments about Vishneva during the intermission -- which is a good sign, I think. (Remembering our own little discussion of La Lacarra here, if a ballerina can draw strong opinions, something interesting is going on.) My favorite was from, first, a man obviously smitten, "I *love* Vishneva, don't you just love her???" Man 2, not smitten, replied: "Love her? I don't even like her!"
I found Kolb underpowered in every way. Like Jeannie, I missed his entrance. I missed him in the pas de deux, too smile.gif I kept waiting for the real Prince to come on. The Countess was rather underplayed as well.
The ballet itself is so strong, it hardly mattered. The King was glorious, a great mime -- watch his hands. The other mimes were fine, too, from Catalabutte down to the Herald. I was mildly disasppointed in Carabosse. (It's hard to get over Monica Mason in this role; I want, if not evil, at least the sense of a dangerous presence.) But it was interesting to see Carabosse danced so clearly -- it's a mime, not a dancing role, but there is a particular stance and walk of Carabosse and that was done beautifully, I thought. I also like the way the Prince modestly stands off to the side during the Awakening scene. It makes the ballet about dynasty, not puppy love. Everyone in this ballet has a role to play in the grand, cosmic scheme of things; it's not personal, but far beyond that.
I thought the corps did a fine job. It's refreshing to see Act II danced in tutus (green, floppy, bouncy ones) and not nymph-nighties, and the dancing was appropriately crisp. (I kept thinkiing it was the salad course between the white meat and the red.) I loved the small footwork in the character and court dances. The production is a reminder of how much has been airbrushed out of classicism over the past 100 years. Put it back!
This was the perfect start to our new ten-year relationship, a wonderful introduction to the company. "Sleeping Beauty" is not only one of the greatest ballets in history but is, arguably, the most influential ballet. It is the well from which 20th classicism sprung, and to which it must return periodically to be refreshed. The Diaghilev production was the first great revival, the old Royal Ballet production, that dominated the Western world for the next 20 years, the second. I think this is the third great revival and I hope it will have the same influence as its two predecessors.
Posted 13 February 2002 - 03:22 PM
One, I have never seen the reverence performed so beautifully. I've never noticed it in Sleeping Beauty before (this may well be me) but it was there last night over and over and I never grew tired of it.
Two, epaulement, especially in the fairies, and especially in the jewels pas de quatre.
Well, hell, three. The character divertissements were very well done and I was delighted to finally see the Cinderella and Hop o My Thumb divertissements.
Posted 13 February 2002 - 04:19 PM
Posted 13 February 2002 - 04:23 PM
This leaves the Kirov and Paris Opera as the only two companies who still maintain a closed house. Long may THAT continue. (I know that the Kirov imports people trained in Perm, as POB has taken in dancers from the Conservatoire, but they're close enough to the native training system that there's no stylstic jarring.)
Posted 13 February 2002 - 08:13 PM
Posted 13 February 2002 - 10:34 PM
[ February 14, 2002: Message edited by: Kevin Ng ]
Posted 14 February 2002 - 02:22 AM
Kevin, I understand how you feel. Me too.
Posted 14 February 2002 - 07:10 AM
They don't have their orchestra. They have the Kennedy Center orchestra. It's not a real orchestra, but a group of musicians brought together to play for ballets (operas? musicals?) and that's just what it sounds like.
I don't have my program and so can't give you the conducotr's name -- I'm sure Jeannie will know it smile.gif
Posted 14 February 2002 - 09:34 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users